We are down about 25% compared to our cost basis, and this is being optimistic. This does not include any transaction related expenses (commissions, fees, etc). If we sell now, we will be down even more. Our house is probably around average or a bit smaller than a typical house in our town. The big houses with big land are down more, and in many cases just linger on market for years.
One of my friends retired at 40, he and his wife worked in finance in NYC. They moved to Wellesley, MA where their children go to school. He says the schools there is as good as any private schools, so they chose that town over others. The homes are not inexpensive, but values are increasing. I have no idea what my friend and his wife's resources are, but they live there and in my former town in NH where their kids ski race in winter. You certainly have the financial resources to live well in MA, plus there are many good schools your wife could attend to pursue her degree.A year ago firecalc was showing 96% spending $22k a month living in one of the more expensive areas of the country outside NYC.
Today firecalc has us firmly at 100%, and the job is adding a lot of unnecessary stress. I am 48, wife is 38 w/ three kids 10, 8 and 6. Have a $1.3mm house w/ $500k mortgage, $7.85mm in investments for retirement mostly non qualified, $1.4mm for education and total net worth just over $10mm.
We can't sell our house as our real estate market is frozen due to high property and local taxes, we paid $1.7mm and have updated kitchen etc.
My wife is currently pursuing her masters degree to become a 3rd grade teacher which she hopes to complete in two years. She is a pre-school teacher now and runs the book fair, library auction etc in our town so she is well connected. This has been a lifelong dream and now that the kids are a little older, it is doable.
If she teaches in the public schools, it would provide platinum health care and her income would pad our passive income of $250k- we spend $260k roughly with tax. We also are quitting our country club with a huge new assessment to go to a smaller club with just racquets / pool.
This could be the third leg of the stool w/ healthcare, extra income, a potential pension and ample time off to travel.
I am wondering if I should wait until she gets hired or if I should just call it quits? The club thing sort of just happened and so did the teacher pursuit. I think the stress is effecting my health - luckily I exercise a lot to manage it and I eat relatively well, but I am sacred to retire at 48. The other concern is what if my kids need to go to private school, so much time until they are out of the nest!
Wondering what others would do in my situation..
One of my friends retired at 40, he and his wife worked in finance in NYC. They moved to Wellesley, MA where their children go to school. He says the schools there is as good as any private schools, so they chose that town over others. The homes are not inexpensive, but values are increasing. I have no idea what my friend and his wife's resources are, but they live there and in my former town in NH where their kids ski race in winter. You certainly have the financial resources to live well in MA, plus there are many good schools your wife could attend to pursue her degree.
Massachusetts state income tax is flat 5.1%. Connecticut is graduated up to 6.99% at $1 million (MFJ). If you make less than $211,000 per year, Connecticut's income tax will be lower.Wow. So even Massachusetts is a tax refuge compared to The Nutmeg State?
Again, wow.
The difference in assessments (1.3M vs 202k) is pretty steep and overwhelms the difference in millage rates. Are these comparable properties, i.e., is one a 6500 sqft 6BR with 3 car garage on 2 acres, while the other is 1800 sqft 4 BR split level on 1/3 acre?
I don't live there so the only data available is what I read on these pages.
My experience over the past 30 years is that when a reassessment comes every 5 years, the mill rate drops but the assessed value goes up and the actual tax paid remains roughly the same, because that's the amount it costs to run the town and schools (about a 50/50 split). The amount of actual tax almost always increases at about the rate of inflation. If there were a widespread and long lasting plunge in the market, I would expect assessed values to drop, but the mill rates to go up to compensate, because, again, it costs a certain amount to run the town. However, that has never happened in my town.
As between CT towns, the ones with more expensive houses generally have lower mill rates and towns with less expensive houses have higher mill rates. Yes, if I had better data it would enable a better head to head comparison. But the average tax bill is the average tax bill. If I move from the average house in Milford CT to the average house in Wellesley MA, my property tax bill will go up (and so would my mortage payments if I had a mortgage).
I think that some school regionalization would be good for CT. There are many smaller towns that have one small elementary school, one small middle school and one small high school, but they have the complete administrative apparatus of a larger school system, with a superintendent of schools, assistant superintendent, curriculum coordinators, etc. Everyone would save money if they combined forces with the small town next door. However, I don't think that will ever happen, because the 169 towns and cities in CT have very strong local powers and jealously guard them.
In any event, it has become sadly popular for certain Connecticut residents to portray our state as some dystopian tax-hell. The actual numbers say it is not. As I noted earlier, for a $211k income MFJ, the state tax in CT and MA is the same. At that income level, NY is about 20% higher. We are very competitive with neighboring states in terms of income and property tax. Sales tax in CT is 6.35%, in MA is 6.25%, in NY is 8.48% (state + local).
CT Demographics
Population 2018 = 3,572,665
Population 2010 = 3,577,845
= decline of 5,180 = -0.14% total over 8 years.
fewer people, yes, but hardly a "mass exodus".
https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/Depar...pulation/Town-Pop/pop_towns2018pdf.pdf?la=en\
The last change to CT income tax rates was in 2015, when they added two brackets above the then maximum 6.5% rate. To wit: 6.9% for income $500k - 1 million and 6.99% for over $1 million. So if you made exactly $1 million, your state income taxes increased by $2000. (If you made $2 million, your taxes increased by $6900). If I were pulling in a million bucks a year, $2k in additional income tax is unlikely to prompt me to migrate, let alone spark a mass exodus of my fellow Nutmeggers.
https://www.cga.ct.gov/2018/rpt/pdf/2018-R-0058.pdf
I don't know exactly where you live. But the inland Fairfield County towns, such as Easton and Weston, have indeed been suffering a down real estate market. Among other factors, they have no business or industry, so residential properties carry the full load of the local property taxes. Another factor is that they generally have really large and expensive houses on substantial lots, and people seem to be turning away from that in general. I've always heard that real estate is very local. Your experience can't be expanded to the entire state of Connecticut.
Zillow shows, for the whole state, increasing median value and decreasing time on the market - two characteristics of a healthy real estate market.
https://www.zillow.com/ct/home-values/
“Tax exodus” seems to be a conclusion in search of supporting data. US Census data (here) shows no such change. The change in CT population is too small to be of any significance. My own view is boomer retirements are the leading cause of change in state populations, and this will continue.CT Demographics
Population 2018 = 3,572,665
Population 2010 = 3,577,845
= decline of 5,180 = -0.14% total over 8 years.
fewer people, yes, but hardly a "mass exodus".
https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/Depar...pulation/Town-Pop/pop_towns2018pdf.pdf?la=en\
“Tax exodus” seems to be a conclusion in search of supporting data. US Census data (here) shows no such change. The change in CT population is too small to be of any significance. My own view is boomer retirements are the leading cause of change in state populations, and this will continue.