Can we FIRE in one year at age 39 & 57?

Dreaming of Freedom

Recycles dryer sheets
Joined
Jan 14, 2015
Messages
206
Hi all! I have been following this forum for a couple years now, as well as MMM & Jacob’s ERE site, but this is my first post to any site. I am currently 38 years old and started becoming interested in retirement planning in my late 20’s when I discovered that normal retirement planning calculators and methods could not give me any useful results for planning an early retirement for myself and my now 56 year old boyfriend. I must say that all 3 websites have been very helpful to me in attempting to devise my own plan. Like most people, I worry that my FIRE number is too low, or I am missing something in the plan. I am hoping that this is my OMY!!!

Stats:
  • Retirement savings goal: $1,250,000 (doable unless the market takes a big, long term crash)
  • Current savings: $1,155,000 (75% his, 25% mine incl. 457b|70% stocks, 30% low risk|63% deferred tax accts, 37% Roth or taxable acct)
  • Retirement date: 2/1/2016
  • Social Security: $20,000 in mid-2025 (reduced 20% from $25,000 given by SSA, just in case).
  • Estimated expenses less healthcare & taxes: $30,000 (based on 2014 expenses + inflation, not bare-bones)
  • Estimated healthcare/insurance/dental: $10,000 with ACA plan
  • Estimated income taxes: $4,500
  • Total estimated expenses: $44,500 not including large purchases (van, car, RV, garage addition)
  • Large purchases in retirement: $190,000 (Replace car (3x), large van (2x), travel trailer (2x), & garage addition, over a 40 year time period)
  • Primary Home value: $80,000 to $120,000 paid off & fully remodeled from the studs up the past 10 years.
  • Soon to be rental property: value=$120,000, mortgage=$58,000 @ 4.125%, about $20,000 in repairs needed before it can be rented. Hopefully we can rent it before the end of this year.
  • Rental property income: $7,500/year starting in 2022 when it is paid off. The gross income would be $12,600/year before vacancy, taxes, insurance, repairs, & other admin expenses. I plan on managing it myself. Hopefully the rent will cover all the property expenses until it is paid off.
  • I plan to work part time, at least until the rental house is paid off, but it is hard to put a dollar figure to my income. My boyfriend may also work part time, but there is no plan at this point. So, I don’t include this income into the equation.
  • No pensions or annuities (rolling over the “risky” non-cola’d state pension I can’t take for 22+ years into an IRA)
  • We don’t have any kids. Hopefully my parents & step-parents can take care of themselves as they get older. They are slightly older than my boyfriend, but not nearly as responsible.

Action items that have to be completed before we retire:
1) Rehab future rental property & get it rented. We will be doing most of the work ourselves as we did with our primary home. Hopefully materials plus limited labor won’t exceed $20,000. The house needs to be rented at least 10 months a year or else it will add to our living expenses.
2) Finish paying off my student loan by the end of this year.
3) Take over control of boyfriend’s retirement accounts from financial planner & save $6,000/year with DIY. The accounts are currently with Schwab. We might manage them there, or we might move everything to Vanguard. I already DIY my own accounts and a Vanguard Roth for him.
4) We may get married this year or next year to simplify things. I would like his SS someday as mine will be small since I only have 15 full time income years, and 7 part time income years. Being married will also reduce his RMD since I am almost 18 years younger (as will small Roth conversions until he is 70).

Notes:
1) I am only counting on one SS check at a time due to age difference. If we are both still alive when I can take full SS, it is icing on the cake. When he dies, I will hopefully get his amount of SS, though they could change the rules by then.
2) We will most likely self-insure for long term care. I will still be pretty young when he gets old, and can hopefully take care of him unless/until he gets really bad and has to go into a nursing home or memory care unit. It is hard to plan for myself as that may be 40 to 50 years away.
3) We are both pretty healthy & active, and he does not need to take any medications. I have a couple generic prescriptions and expect to pay for them out of pocket.
4) It looks like we can withdraw $50,000/year + fund large purchases according to FireCalc, if our starting egg is $1,250,000. I worry if I am filling out the Off Chart Income/Spending section properly: +$7,500 starting in 2022 for rental income, and -37,500 starting 2042 to estimate added long term care costs ($30K extra from 2042-2062) & the loss of rental income due to sale of property(-7,500). I have run FC from 30-57 years, looking for the worst case scenario. $50,000/year is $5,500 above our normal expenses and could be used for extra medical, extra travel, kept in savings, etc.
5) I worry because I see people on here with $2 million to $10 million saved, sometimes with pensions too, and they still don’t think they can retire. We do live in a low cost area in the Midwest, but I feel we have the ability to move to other somewhat higher cost areas of the US if we really wanted to (except NYC, SF, LA, or DC). Am I kidding myself?
6) I really don’t want to work full time any longer than I have to, am not happy anymore at my current job, and would feel bad if I switched jobs and then “retired” 1 to 2 years later. I would like to try doing other things outside my career to make money, own my own small business, and possibly collaborate with my boyfriend on something. I am also completely open to working as a part time or short term, full time employee/contractor in my career field (Information Systems related field).
7) Our dividends, interest, and capital gains have been more than our living expenses for at least the past 2 years, but these have been pretty good years for the market.
8) Sorry for all the information! I am trying not to forget anything. Please tell me we can FIRE next year, and I am not dreaming :)
 
You can't retire without his money. If you break up then you have no claim to his money. If I were in your situation, I would not quit my job until I got married.
 
You have to have a fallback plan for what happens to you if you split up before getting married or even get married and then get a divorce. You would not be eligible for your spouse's SS if you got divorced before being married 10 years. I am not sure what assets of his you would be entitled to if you got married and then divorced after 5 years or so, but that is something to think about. The reality is half of all marriages end in divorce, and you don't want to end up divorced and broke five years down the line.
 
Welcome Dreaming...
I agree with aaron and daylate - you need to look at your retirement plan individually during the time before you get married. Your numbers don't work without his savings... so don't quit your job till you're married. This isn't a moral judgement -it's a legal/financial judgement.

In the meantime, save save save... and sock away a few more SS years.

Sounds like you guys are doing a great job at living below your means and saving...
 
Welcome!

I agree with others that you will be dependent on your BF. If your career field is one that is hard to reenter after a multi year unemployment, that could be a problem if you have to go back to supporting yourself.

But if you can easily reenter your profession, then it may be fine.

Sent from my SM-T237P using Early Retirement Forum mobile app
 
Thanks for the feedback. I have reviewed the thread "Some Important Questions to Answer Before Asking - Can I Retire?". It is a great resource!!!

As for marriage, I told my boyfriend that we have to get married before I quit my job to protect me in case he dies. He is OK with this as we have been together for almost 12 years and are best friends. Do most married couples calculate if they will both be FI if they get divorced before they retire? It is a smart thing to do, but I wonder how many people actually do it?

I would have to work another 4 years to be truly independent without a roommate, though I will cover 35-40% of our regular expenses in retirement through investment income, part-time income, and eventually rental income (the rental property is my house, the primary residence is his). We each need less money for retirement if we are together than if we are separate.
 
Last edited:
Do most married couples calculate if they will both be FI if they get divorced before they retire? It is a smart thing to do, but I wonder how many people actually do it?

The issue here is that you have not been married for 12 years or even 1 year so far, so if you split up before you got married or even afterwards you probably would not get half the assets your boyfriend / future husband accumulated prior to marriage and he has the bulk of the assets. Plus you might no longer being paying into SS during what are often a workers' peak earning years, you would not be entitled to his SS if you didn't marry or divorced before 10 years and presumably you would no longer be saving for retirement during your peak earning years. Fifty percent of marriages end in divorce. It is good to have a Plan B.

I don't know what most married couples actually do, but I have a lot of divorced friends who probably wished they had thought more about what would happen to them financially if they got divorced or their husbands left them before it actually happened.
 
Last edited:
I went back to the drawing board and figured up what my income would be later in retirement once I got my own Social Security. I came up with $26,000/yr which includes about $10,500 of SS, after 20% reduction, using actual figures with zeros this year and beyond; and about $15,500 in income from 4% of investments, provided that they are the same value when I take SS as they are now. I am probably going to use a 3.5% withdraw rate per year until that point.

The numbers are still not quite as good as I would like for myself if I were on my own. I am thinking that I might work 2-3 more years and/or try to buy another investment property if the first one works out OK this year, and I can get a good deal. Or I might decide you only live once, one of us could die early, and we should enjoy life together while we can. I would have to make part time work a big priority though. Maybe I could get a prenup that says he has to stay married to me 10 years, or else give up a certain amount of money to make up for lost SS? I am kidding...mostly, but they do it in Hollywood all the time. I am not exactly the Hollywood trophy wife type though even though I am much younger...I am more of a "I will help you work on the car/house" type :)

I don't know if I can create polls yet, but it would be interesting to see how many couples do retirement planning and make sure each person would be OK if they got divorced.
 
I went back to the drawing board and figured up what my income would be later in retirement once I got my own Social Security. I came up with $26,000/yr which includes about $10,500 of SS, after 20% reduction, using actual figures with zeros this year and beyond; and about $15,500 in income from 4% of investments, provided that they are the same value when I take SS as they are now. I am probably going to use a 3.5% withdraw rate per year until that point.

The numbers are still not quite as good as I would like for myself if I were on my own. I am thinking that I might work 2-3 more years and/or try to buy another investment property if the first one works out OK this year, and I can get a good deal. Or I might decide you only live once, one of us could die early, and we should enjoy life together while we can. I would have to make part time work a big priority though. Maybe I could get a prenup that says he has to stay married to me 10 years, or else give up a certain amount of money to make up for lost SS? I am kidding...mostly, but they do it in Hollywood all the time. I am not exactly the Hollywood trophy wife type though even though I am much younger...I am more of a "I will help you work on the car/house" type :)

I don't know if I can create polls yet, but it would be interesting to see how many couples do retirement planning and make sure each person would be OK if they got divorced.
Like you, I would guess not many

The minute I even considered this calculation I would decide to stay single. There are many possible partners, but only so much money in the world.
 
You have a good grasp on the basics. A few observations for your situation, which is a little atypical, given the age differences:

  • Social Security: $20,000 in mid-2025 (reduced 20% from $25,000 given by SSA, just in case).
  • Estimated expenses less healthcare & taxes: $30,000 (based on 2014 expenses + inflation, not bare-bones)
  • Estimated healthcare/insurance/dental: $10,000 with ACA plan
...
4) We may get married this year or next year to simplify things. I would like his SS someday as mine will be small since I only have 15 full time income years, and 7 part time income years. Being married will also reduce his RMD since I am almost 18 years younger (as will small Roth conversions until he is 70).

As you note, his SS will be larger than yours. Given that you are relying on his SS, and that you will be collecting it much later than him (and inflation will likely erode it far more), I would suggest you think of having him delay collecting it until he reaches age 70, if it would mean you would be able to collect a larger SS check when you reach full retirement age.

2) We will most likely self-insure for long term care. I will still be pretty young when he gets old, and can hopefully take care of him unless/until he gets really bad and has to go into a nursing home or memory care unit. It is hard to plan for myself as that may be 40 to 50 years away.
...
4) It looks like we can withdraw $50,000/year + fund large purchases according to FireCalc, if our starting egg is $1,250,000. I worry if I am filling out the Off Chart Income/Spending section properly: +$7,500 starting in 2022 for rental income, and -37,500 starting 2042 to estimate added long term care costs ($30K extra from 2042-2062) & the loss of rental income due to sale of property(-7,500). I have run FC from 30-57 years, looking for the worst case scenario. $50,000/year is $5,500 above our normal expenses and could be used for extra medical, extra travel, kept in savings, etc.

If you sell the rental property, what are you doing with the proceeds? Is that added to your investment portfolio, or will you use the lump-sum sale proceeds to pay for things?

You have to be careful with your projections on the LTC issue. If he needs to receive help in a care facility, that would easily run you $50,000/year MINIMUM in 2015 dollars. In addition to your annual expenses! Also, even if you think you are able to care for him at home, be realistic. Could you really pick him up and maneuver him around, bearing a majority of his weight, if need be? There may be some things you could do, but there are limits. So for you to add $30k extra for LTC costs from 2042-2062 isn't necessarily a slam-dunk safety measure. While the total $ in your budget is generous ($600k future dollars), keep in mind that he could need care in his 70s, and that taking an earlier hit to your budget with a much larger annual amount could have far different consequences than a smaller $30k line item starting much later.

Also remember that FireCalc actually gives perverse results for a time horizon of 40+ years, because there are fewer 40+ year periods to test against. So if you plug in a 45 year retirement, you might end up with a higher safe withdrawal rate - even though some of the more challenging retirement periods that would likely end in failure aren't adequately represented in those 45-50 year retirement spans.


5) I worry because I see people on here with $2 million to $10 million saved, sometimes with pensions too, and they still don’t think they can retire. We do live in a low cost area in the Midwest, but I feel we have the ability to move to other somewhat higher cost areas of the US if we really wanted to (except NYC, SF, LA, or DC). Am I kidding myself?

It's a very simple question: are you able to live off of a 3%-3.5% withdrawal rate from your portfolio to meet your anticipated budget, with some fluff built in? And whether you want to live in NYC or Podunk, Alabama also completely depends on your budget. Are you ok with living in a very very low cost of living area that may not be as desirable, or do you want to live in a nicer area of a "somewhat higher cost of living area"? Only you can answer that question. "Feeling" like you have the ability to move to a higher cost area is irrelevant. Your future landlord won't give a hoot what your "feelings" are on whether you can afford it - your budget either will afford the higher cost of living or it won't. There isn't really any subjective component. Unless, that is, you are comfortable with merely assuming that you can somehow magically offset higher dwelling expenses, higher food costs, and higher everything-else-costs and will somehow make it work in a higher cost of living area.
 
March 2016 update: Not yet retired.

Savings: 1.21 million, Net Worth: 1.36 million (25% mine, 75% his)

Living expenses past 12 months: $26,000 (not incl. Income tax, health/dental insurance, “rental house” mortgage/expenses, or main house remodel over $3,000). Could shave another $2,000 off if needed.

Estimated income taxes & health/dental insurance & expenses: $16,000/year.
Total est expenses in retirement: $42,000/year not including large purchases (car, van, travel trailer, new garage).

New retirement savings “number” is $1.3 to $1.4 million.

Other updates:

We are both still working full time. He can retire anytime, but does not even think about it. I would like him to retire the end of this year. I may retire 4/1/17 or 2/1/18 depending on my “stash” and status of rental house rehab & debt.

We still have 2 houses, and are finally moving into our main home after years of remodeling. The plan is to rehab the 2nd house and rent it this fall if all goes well (it needs a ton of work and $). It will be paid off by 2023, and then will net ~$7,500/year in today's dollars.

I plan to work another 1 to 2 years until age 41 or 42 to build up my own retirement fund and pay off the rental house rehab work. I will not retire until we are married and my house is rehabbed and rented for a few months. My boyfriend does not know when he will retire, although he has enough money to retire now at age 57. He is NOT good at looking into the future, but luckily he is fiscally conservative and we are usually on the same page about almost everything.

I did take over control of my boyfriend's retirement accounts from his financial planner, so we no longer have that pesky ~$5,500/year fee. I took over the accounts on December 31st, 2015 and despite the recent market roller coaster, things are not looking too bad.

I still do not know if I will wait nearly 20 years to take my state pension, or remove my contributions instead. The politicians are making the pension problems worse than they already are, and I worry it will be defunct before I am 59.5. I am planning to take my SS at 62, my boyfriend will take his as late as possible (between age 66.6 & 70), and then I will take the survivor's benefit when he dies. NOTE: we will be married before I retire.

I made some changes in FireCalc raising our income needs to $100,000/year for 5 years to simulate assisted living/nursing home needs for him. I also upped our large one-time expenses by $50,000 to account for possibly moving to a more expensive house/area. I do not include the proceeds of the sale of our main home as I figure it can help cover any additional expenses during the later years of my life. I am shooting for an initial withdrawal rate of 3.25% for us which would be further reduced by part time income, future rental property income, and Social Security. FireCalc says we look more than 100% OK for 48 years, though I could be alive longer than that.

My own independent retirement success numbers are not quite as good. I need to either work part time until I am 50ish, work full time for another 4 years, or pick up another investment property that will net at least $3,500/year. I will pay off my student loans this summer.

Our 2015 Dividends, Interest, and realized capital gains were still higher than our needs, though about $7,000 less than 2014.

I think things are starting to come together I think....I hope.


*I got an old thread warning, so I hope this update is OK.
 
Thanks for the update. Sometimes the OMY is is good.
We have 6 years age difference and wanted to start ER together.
Almost 3 years ER now and life is good.
 
If you have run your FireCalc properly and you are at 100% then you are in good shape. Well done.
 
Just curious why you have not yet married,if you marry today you will have some spousal protection under SS. Right now to SS, you are just the girlfriend with no survivor or spousal SS benefits.
 
[*]Estimated healthcare/insurance/dental: $10,000 with ACA plan

Is this amount for premiums only, or does it include accounting for the max OOP as well? Are you counting on ACA subsidies?

For us (ages 48 and 52), a silver plan without subsidies the premium for two in 2016 would run $12,480/yr and the max OOP is $7200/yr.

I don't expect we'd hit the max OOP every year, but you do have to figure in hitting it some years - maybe 50% of the time? (Just a guestimate I am making, no hard data to go on there.)

Also, FIREcalc doesn't inflate healthcare expenses by more than the CPI. I discovered Fidelity's RIP tool which is more conservative and inflates healthcare expenses by 7%. (ACA actually will likely increase by more than that, but this is based upon Medicare expected inflation - and is more realistic than CPI, IMO. BTW, have you accounted for the change in healthcare costs when you each hit Medicare?)

I recommend taking a hard look at projecting healthcare expenses and consider exploring your numbers with the RIP calculator in addition to FIREcalc.
 
Hi Dreaming of Freedom.

You asked (last year) if folks had considered their plans if divorce factored in. I think many of us have looked at our plans if death takes out one of the parties... In other words - the impact if the a SS stream or pension is reduced due to the death of one party. Granted it doesn't involve splitting the assets - but it's a big enough impact it needs to be considered.

In my case - it made an impact on our plans if DH kicks the bucket sooner - he's already on SS and it's a chunk of our monthly income stream. As his legal wife - I'd get his SS (despite being under 62) until our kids are 18... then it goes away. I have 2 very small pensions that will come online... we chose joint survivorship for those to avoid a loss of the income stream. If I die first - DH would then collect *my* SS (and lose his) since mine is the larger amount.

All of these scenarios work because we're legally married. Not a moral issue - a legal issue with the way pensions and SS are handled with respect to spousal benefits.

To put it in perspective my dad never legally married my step mom because it would have had a negative impact on his and my step mom's income streams. She was collecting widow benefits from her first husband, Dad was collecting survivor benefits from my mom's pension. The income stream hit would have been $5k/month if they'd legally married. As my stepmom said - it's not like they were going to have kids (they were in their late 60's early 70's when they met). So the marriage thing can work both ways.
 
I'm 40, 2 kids, FI but not RE. Married 6 years, DW 35.

Yes. We talked about it and NO, it wouldn't be possible :). What would most likely happen is we split assets 50/50 and then weight it so that whoever has the kids (probably her because if we divorced I suspect it'd be ugly and she would fight like hell for kids and almost certainly win... I wouldn't take them from their mom... she's an amazing SAHM today). Then I'd probably go "back" to work (assuming I retired :) ).

If she wasn't my wife it's totally different. People have their own opinions on the institution of marriage... that's fine... unfortunately no one cares about the legal opinion people have. There the law matters.

If she married me today, she would not have the same claim on assets I accumulated while we weren't married. That gives me huge leverage. If she'd been living with me and helping during that time it would make things pretty unfair. There ARE laws protecting people in that situation but being legally married is pretty rock solid.

Of course my wife and I will NEVER divorce, but neither will the other half of people who eventually do :).

As the person in our relationship who was the primary earner and she the primary "time giver" it's important that she have a solid way of getting the deferred value for her time. Money can be taken back... time not so much.

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Early Retirement Forum mobile app
 
We plan on getting married prior to my retirement. We have just been really busy and have not gotten around to it because it is lower priority than say fixing the roof, car, etc. Sadly, I have not even gotten around to putting together wills, but at least I got all the beneficiary information updated last year. We should be eligible for decent ACA subsidies as long as they don't go away. We could definitely handle a couple years here and there of $18,000 health insurance/healthcare expenses, though we would really have to cut back our lifestyle if we had $18,000 of health ins + healthcare expenses every year. How much should I budget for health insurance & healthcare expenses every year? What about Medicare & related expenses. We are both pretty healthy and do not have any regular medications that we have to take.

Is there a way to get access to the Fidelity RIP tool if you are not a Fidelity customer? I have used FireCalc, ********, & Quicken Lifetime Planner. I have also been working with a FP on a comprehensive financial plan through their "black box" software, but I am not sure how much I can trust it. Their software wants to always put us in the 25% tax bracket, and we have never been in that bracket, or plan to be in that bracket.
 
We should be eligible for decent ACA subsidies as long as they don't go away. We could definitely handle a couple years here and there of $18,000 health insurance/healthcare expenses, though we would really have to cut back our lifestyle if we had $18,000 of health ins + healthcare expenses every year. How much should I budget for health insurance & healthcare expenses every year? What about Medicare & related expenses. We are both pretty healthy and do not have any regular medications that we have to take.

Go to healthcare.gov and price out a silver plan (the only ones eligible for subsidies, since that is what you are counting on) for the two of you. I used the premium plus half the max OOP in my modeling - not sure this is the best way, but, it is my attempt at a best guess (that half the time you may have bad years where you hit the max OOP).

You may find this thread useful:

http://www.early-retirement.org/for...r-increases-in-healthcare-spending-80534.html

Also, regarding Medicare, I found the information posters shared with me on this thread I started very helpful:

http://www.early-retirement.org/forums/f38/budgeting-for-medicare-costs-80693.html

Is there a way to get access to the Fidelity RIP tool if you are not a Fidelity customer?

Not sure, hopefully someone else will answer that! I do believe I read you can open some kind of free account, but I'm not sure.

I have used FireCalc, ********, & Quicken Lifetime Planner. I have also been working with a FP on a comprehensive financial plan through their "black box" software, but I am not sure how much I can trust it. Their software wants to always put us in the 25% tax bracket, and we have never been in that bracket, or plan to be in that bracket.

I believe you can choose your tax bracket in the RIP model.
 
Go to healthcare.gov and price out a silver plan (the only ones eligible for subsidies, since that is what you are counting on) for the two of you. I used the premium plus half the max OOP in my modeling - not sure this is the best way, but, it is my attempt at a best guess (that half the time you may have bad years where you hit the max OOP).
[...]

My understanding of the first point you raised is different: I believe all ACA-compatible plans are eligible for subsidies (Bronze through Platinum). In fact, you'll find that the subsidies have more "leverage" for lower plans (i.e., Bronze) since the amount of the subsidy doesn't change. Effectively the government pays a bigger share of the lower-coverage plans than of the higher-coverage plans.

I also think your modeling of medical expenses as half of OOP is not the most accurate approach - I think it is far over-estimating the cost for healthy people. It would be better to use an understanding of your past expenses and/or family history to come up with a more individual estimate. Remember, too, that you can switch plans at open enrollment - so you can change which plan you're on based on your health status.

For healthy people, your expenses will mostly be low. Your worst-case is probably an accident (for me it was an Achilles tendon rupture) that will quickly put you into the OOP.

For this scenario, the Bronze plan is likely to be by far the best.

For people with chronic issues it will likely get more complicated. If you're in subsidy territory, there is still likely to be a significant advantage to choosing the lower-level plans, but if your spending is high, some of the higher plans may turn out to be advantageous - this is also quite dependent on what your state's offerings are for coverage.

The general thing is that there is no free lunch: The better coverage of the higher-level plans comes from the higher premiums, so you're still paying for it. And since the subsidies are a much larger percentage of the premium for the lower-level plans, the equation is skewed in favor of those plans.
 
My understanding of the first point you raised is different: I believe all ACA-compatible plans are eligible for subsidies (Bronze through Platinum). In fact, you'll find that the subsidies have more "leverage" for lower plans (i.e., Bronze) since the amount of the subsidy doesn't change. Effectively the government pays a bigger share of the lower-coverage plans than of the higher-coverage plans.

My understanding is different. Yes, you may receive subsidies for the premiums of all plans, but if you have a low enough income, you can also receive assistance ("cost sharing reductions") with the max OOP on Silver plans, only.

IMPORTANT
If you qualify for these extra savings on out-of-pocket costs, you get them only if you enroll in a plan in the Silver category. You can use a premium tax credit for a plan in any metal category, but you’ll get cost-sharing reductions only if you pick a Silver plan.


*source: https://www.healthcare.gov/lower-costs/save-on-out-of-pocket-costs/


I also think your modeling of medical expenses as half of OOP is not the most accurate approach - I think it is far over-estimating the cost for healthy people.

Yes, it may be inaccurate for healthy people, but it helps me feel a bit more secure about our plans to plan for "worst case scenario". ie. you are only healthy until you are unhealthy. No one knows if they are going to be diagnosed with a chronic health condition at some point in their life, which can be quite costly.

I like to try to plan for worst case scenario and see how far off we are from being able to handle that budget. If we can't be successful with that plan, but we still decide to pull the plug, at least I know what degree of risk I am taking - eyes wide open.

Maybe the younger you are, you could feel more comfortable projecting say 25% of max OOP every year, as your chance of getting a chronic illness definitely goes up with age.

It's all a crapshoot IMO but you have to try to project/plan for out of pocket costs somehow. And IMO you can't go on past healthcare expenses because that can change in the blink of an eye with a devastating diagnosis you never expected.
 
The risk is that your boyfriend can leave you in a heartbeat if he sees a younger 20+ girls. Cement the relationship with marriage, and then you have the right to the $1 million money. Your money of $300,000 at 38 years old won't be enough for you to retire to 70 .
 
The risk is that your boyfriend can leave you in a heartbeat if he sees a younger 20+ girls. Cement the relationship with marriage, and then you have the right to the $1 million money. Your money of $300,000 at 38 years old won't be enough for you to retire to 70 .

If he had the money before they were married, maybe not. I think as Rodi mentioned, plan for the possibility of being widowed as well as split up (married or not). One of my friends just assumed she was the beneficiary of some retirement assets from her long time partner when in reality the partner's adult children were the named beneficiaries. That was half of what she had considered their retirement joint assets.

With the OP's relationship age differences and wealth disparity, it might not hurt to discuss a back up plan with a fee only financial planner. It can tough for women 50+ to be widowed or divorced, and the odds of one of those events happening are far from remote. It can sometimes be especially hard for middle aged women if they have been out of the job market for some time and lack current work skills.
 
Last edited:
My understanding is different. Yes, you may receive subsidies for the premiums of all plans, but if you have a low enough income, you can also receive assistance ("cost sharing reductions") with the max OOP on Silver plans, only.
[...]

Thanks, I wasn't aware of the out-of-pocket reductions - California's website didn't have this information broken out (though it does appear to change the benefit descriptions based on this distinction). It appears the out of pocket maximum is also adjusted.

I played with the numbers a bit, and it's still not clear that this will always make the Silver option the preferred - Bronze still comes ahead for healthy individuals and individuals who hit the out of pocket maximum.

I put in a hypothetical 55 year old couple with incomes of 58K and 38K to see how things look.

For the 58K case, the premium difference is approximately $370 a month (or $4440 a year). Out of pocket maximums (individual/family) are: 6500/13000 vs. $6250/12500.

For the 38K case, the premium difference is smaller $223 a month (or $2676 a year) - this is due to the fact that the subsidy is getting maxed out, so the net premium is only $2/month. OOP maxes are: 6500/13000 for Bronze vs. $5450/10900.

You can see that the difference in OOP amounts doesn't make up for the higher premiums in either case (though the 38K case makes it close).

So the benefit for the Silver plan is in the mid-range - if you spend less than the OOP max, but more than the difference in the cost of the premiums, there's a range where the Silver plan is ahead.

Yes, it may be inaccurate for healthy people, but it helps me feel a bit more secure about our plans to plan for "worst case scenario". ie. you are only healthy until you are unhealthy. [...]
Maybe the younger you are, you could feel more comfortable projecting say 25% of max OOP every year, as your chance of getting a chronic illness definitely goes up with age.

Fair enough - and projecting 50% of OOP a year certainly would qualify as a pretty "bad case" in my book.

Note that how that happens makes a big difference to choice of plan. If it happens the way you stated originally (hitting the OOP max 50% of the years), the Bronze plan might come out ahead, where if the spending is flat (i.e., 50% of OOP max every year) the Silver plan is likely better.
 
Back
Top Bottom