Just to be clear, I do not use a 2% average return. I haircut the historical average return for my AA by 2% (from ~7.5% to 5.5%) in the deterministic analysis. I also look at Financial Engines.
Thanks for the clarification.
Just to be clear, I do not use a 2% average return. I haircut the historical average return for my AA by 2% (from ~7.5% to 5.5%) in the deterministic analysis. I also look at Financial Engines.
I'll give it a look in the near future.CJ, the FIRECalc link I provided above gives a description of how the program works. Give it a read and see if you still maintain it uses Monte Carlo...
Nun,
Thanks for the encouraging comments on my situation.
I thought about responding with some remarks on socialized medicine, but I don't think this is the place to have that debate. I recognize there are different views with people who are passionate on both sides and it is not an easy problem to solve.
CJ, the FIRECalc link I provided above gives a description of how the program works. Give it a read and see if you still maintain it uses Monte Carlo...
Thanks for giving me this insight. Having just looked at Firecalc briefly, I did not pick up on that nuance. I'd have to look at Firecalc a little more to make any meaningful comment. What I do know is Monte Carlo analysis is far superior for projecting retirement readiness than using an approach like Quicken, where you use a historical return of X% and project it forward.
I'll post a comment on this at a future date, although it may be a while until I have the time...vacation is over and back to work tomorrow.