Ed B
Recycles dryer sheets
I sent this missive to a co-worker that I discuss ER and investment stuff with. It sums up what has changed about my thinking since joining this site. Tell me if I have misinterpreted the general FIRE community orthodoxy.
Thanks for your inputs.I have been studying post retirement investing more and I am coming around to being more aggressive with my 401K balance now and after I retire. One of the reasons is that many of the articles and discussions we read and hear assumes no pension since that is the reality for the Gen-Xers and Millennials. And the articles or discussions I have seen lately suggest mentally converting any pension benefit we will get into an equivalent lump sum and figuring in that lump sum to our Asset Allocations as part of your low risk fixed income/bond funds compared to equities. So when we read articles that talk about 50/50 or 60/40 splits being appropriate for someone in retirement, that article very well may assume assets will account for all non-SocSec revenue.
So if you have a pension that will pay $50k annually, that would correlate to $1.25m ($50K/.04) in Bonds or Fixed Income investments. That frees me up to be more aggressive with my current assets. If a person retired with $500k in 401K/IRAs and a 50K pension, and then invested that entire $500K in a S&P500 indexed fund, the Asset Allocation would be a somewhat conservative 40% equities 60% FI or Bonds. And as long as we stay the course and don’t panic, our assets would survive even tech bubble/housing bubble corrections. Now if that $500K is instead placed in very conservative, low return investments then it will struggle to keep up with inflation over time. On the other hand if we are in individual equities rather than an indexed fund then those bubbles could be crushing if we picked the wrong stocks.
If we don’t look at our 401K/IRA balances differently between now and well into retirement (they are our assets whether we are working our not) then it doesn’t make as much sense to change investment strategy too much 1 or 2 years before retirement. It certainly doesn't make sense to change investment strategy 2 years before retirement to something that is far more conservative than what we will do in retirement. For example, I don’t need a 4th annuity so I won’t use my 401K assets that way. I have my pension, SocSec and even my wife’s SocSec. I will need some for health insurance before Medicare, growth for COLAs down the road, and emergency money. Of course we have to be able to sleep at night so there is not right or wrong answer, but I haven’t been looking at things this way.