|
Any experts in moving violations - 22526(a) ?
08-02-2017, 03:36 PM
|
#1
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 717
|
Any experts in moving violations - 22526(a) ?
I am looking for ways to confirm or otherwise that CA CVC 22526(a) is in fact not a moving violation nor a point on your driving record violation.
I got it on my driving record and trying to understand if it was listed there incorrectly and also is it's not moving violation that it won't increase my insurance.
Thx
__________________
“The problem with the world is that the intelligent people are full of doubt, while the stupid people are full of confidence.”
(—Charles Bukowski)
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
08-02-2017, 03:37 PM
|
#2
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,838
|
However, this violation is not a violation point, according to section 12810.4:
"12810.4. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no violation point shall be given for a conviction of a violation of Section 22526. " Call your broker make sure you not getting charged. Give him the above info.
__________________
Withdrawal Rate currently zero, Pension 137 % of our spending, Wasted 5 years of my prime working extra for a safe withdrawal rate. I can live like a King for a year, or a Prince for the rest of my life. I will stay on topic, I will stay on topic, I will stay on topic
|
|
|
08-02-2017, 03:52 PM
|
#3
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 717
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Collar Guy
However, this violation is not a violation point, according to section 12810.4:
"12810.4. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no violation point shall be given for a conviction of a violation of Section 22526. " Call your broker make sure you not getting charged. Give him the above info.
|
My insurance Ameriprise states that it's "moving" violation. How do I prove otherwise ?
__________________
“The problem with the world is that the intelligent people are full of doubt, while the stupid people are full of confidence.”
(—Charles Bukowski)
|
|
|
08-02-2017, 04:33 PM
|
#4
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Flyover country
Posts: 25,359
|
Maybe get a lawyer involved?
Googling that offense yields a ton of references.
https://www.google.com/search?client...UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
__________________
I thought growing old would take longer.
|
|
|
08-02-2017, 04:52 PM
|
#5
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Cottage Grove
Posts: 212
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wanaberetiree
I am looking for ways to confirm or otherwise that CA CVC 22526(a) is in fact not a moving violation nor a point on your driving record violation.
I got it on my driving record and trying to understand if it was listed there incorrectly and also is it's not moving violation that it won't increase my insurance.
Thx
|
I've had speeding tickets in 6 states and 2 countries but I have no idea about that.
|
|
|
08-02-2017, 06:16 PM
|
#6
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,838
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wanaberetiree
My insurance Ameriprise states that it's "moving" violation. How do I prove otherwise ?
|
That part of the negotiation I am unable to help with, sorry.
__________________
Withdrawal Rate currently zero, Pension 137 % of our spending, Wasted 5 years of my prime working extra for a safe withdrawal rate. I can live like a King for a year, or a Prince for the rest of my life. I will stay on topic, I will stay on topic, I will stay on topic
|
|
|
08-02-2017, 07:40 PM
|
#7
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Leeward Oahu
Posts: 17,930
|
Sounds like it's time to look for new insurance and find a co. that doesn't count this against you. YMMV
__________________
Ko'olau's Law -
Anything which can be used can be misused. Anything which can be misused will be.
|
|
|
08-02-2017, 08:23 PM
|
#8
|
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 9,182
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Collar Guy
However, this violation is not a violation point, according to section 12810.4:
"12810.4. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no violation point shall be given for a conviction of a violation of Section 22526. " Call your broker make sure you not getting charged. Give him the above info.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wanaberetiree
My insurance Ameriprise states that it's "moving" violation. How do I prove otherwise ?
|
If your insurance company says it's a moving violation, then it probably is - as a matter of their policy. The place to find your answer is in their documentation. If it's specifically stated in their policies that that particular violation is a moving violation, then it is. If, on the other hand, their policies state that they follow state/local/municipal . . . rules for defining what is and what is not a moving violation, then you need to put the law citation in from of them and ask for a correction.
|
|
|
08-02-2017, 09:55 PM
|
#9
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,838
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry1
If your insurance company says it's a moving violation, then it probably is - as a matter of their policy. The place to find your answer is in their documentation. If it's specifically stated in their policies that that particular violation is a moving violation, then it is. If, on the other hand, their policies state that they follow state/local/municipal . . . rules for defining what is and what is not a moving violation, then you need to put the law citation in from of them and ask for a correction.
|
+1 OK what he said.
__________________
Withdrawal Rate currently zero, Pension 137 % of our spending, Wasted 5 years of my prime working extra for a safe withdrawal rate. I can live like a King for a year, or a Prince for the rest of my life. I will stay on topic, I will stay on topic, I will stay on topic
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|