tryan
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2005
- Messages
- 2,604
... Well - if I remember correctly - Manning had a $28 MILLION sign-on bonus with the Colts coming Friday ... they let him go Wednesday. Not coincidence ....
No one involved ever suggested money wasn't a central issue, even at the time. Neither Manning nor Irsay were considered 'villains' at the time by most people. All parties were saddened by the decision, but they also understood why it had to be.... Well - if I remember correctly - Manning had a $28 MILLION sign-on bonus with the Colts coming Friday ... they let him go Wednesday. Not coincidence ....
Although Manning's health can't be discounted, Irsay insists bottom-line economics drove his decision. Re-upping the NFL's only four-time Most Valuable Player would exacerbate the Colts' already serious salary-cap issues.
"There wouldn't have been a Robert Mathis or a Reggie Wayne," Irsay insisted. "There was no way we could have put (Manning) on the field with the type of team we would have fielded."
In the weeks leading up to The Decision, Irsay and Manning talked. They discussed Manning's health and how much arm strength he had regained. At one point, Irsay floated the possibility of Manning restructuring his contract. In lieu of the team paying the $28 million option bonus that would be part of a four-year, $63.6 million deal, Manning would accept an incentive-laden package that would reward him if he made a full recovery.
But Manning had all the leverage and wouldn't restructure his contract. The Colts would have to pay him the roster bonus or cut him and allow him to sign a big contract with another team.
How did that work out for him? The Cowboys are something like 138-138 over the past 17ish years.
Well ... I am glad we settled this debate. Only question is: who is the best QB EVER:
Montana or
Brady
Though we are diehard Pats fans, I still consider Montana the best ever so far. Both great clutch players (more important than pure stats IMO), but no one was as consistently cool under pressure than Montana IMO. To his credit, Brady hasn't had a lot of marquee players around him during his career (IOW he's been successful with an ever changing supporting cast, to his credit) and he is still playing, so we'll see...Well ... I am glad we settled this debate. Only question is: who is the best QB EVER:
Montana or
Brady
Most successful QB's on the fileld.... Let's see, in my football watching memory, there's Montana, Brady, Rodgers, Manning, Elway, Bradshaw, Farve, maybe Unitas and a few others. Hard to say, however, "one of the most successful QB's" off the field (measured in dollars) has to be Roger Staubach. He probably belongs on the best on the field too.