Join Early Retirement Today
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 07-15-2007, 08:51 PM   #41
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 18,881
Originally Posted by pj86 View Post
Transportation is already heavily taxed, which prevents people and businesses from reaching their full potential.
Yes, but some say that it is not taxed enough relative to the environmental costs.

I agree theoretically on taxing 'externalities' such as pollution, but have big questions with the scientific value of any academic area that is politically influenced. Also, if agreed gov't needs to intervene, the optimal solution is to create more market, namely a market in which the externality (e.g. CO2) trades.
I question the science vs politics too, but I'm not sure what to do about it, short of funding my own multi-million dollar study. CO2 trades are good, IMO, but I think they need to be coupled with some sort of caps , which could just be those extra taxes.

In practice, I fear that, despite all the good intentions that people like the columnist and you may have, some pigs will become more equal than others over time.
For the most part it has always been that way. I'm not sure that means one should give up the fight, though. Look at the progress that has been made with the Clean Air Act, and other policies. Far from perfect, but significant progress none-the-less.


ERD50 is online now   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 07-16-2007, 05:48 AM   #42
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
ladelfina's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,713
Yes, but some say that it is not taxed enough relative to the environmental costs.
ExACTly, ERD50! The "savings" going in to one pocket can easily come out of the other --even if you don't look at pollution alone, but include shared cost burdens like endless congestion (what's your hourly rate for sitting in traffic?), paying for new roads, and paying for wars to secure "our" oil supply.

But leaving aside these extrapolations, let's just look at the concrete trade efficiencies or lack thereof.

In a perfect "free market" ERD50's scenario of bar codes and so forth could happen. But many underlying costs are hidden or diffused. I remember trying to get it through an MIT consultant chick's head that "cost-cutting" did not make costs "go away" but was essentially just off-loading your cost on someone else. Especially in the US, it sometimes "makes more sense" to truck things rather than use railroads. Not because it is always OVERALL cheaper, but because we have low taxes on gas, and "free" highways where we don't have "free" railways. A private company might buy out an inner-city rail yard to put up a series of big-box stores you have to drive to; the local gov't. might play along thinking of an increased prop. tax base.. so, poof! no more rail access to the city. The patchwork of local/state/federal/international/public/private doesn't allow for the most efficient approach.

No one is in charge of (nor do consumers have the overview of) the entire system of tariffs, taxes and public and private costs, so no one has either enough incentive or enough information to change anything.

There was an interesting article in the New Yorker some months back about new building construction and energy. Basically a consultant had worked with a developer to engineer an office building in such a way that an initially higher construction outlay would pay itself back 10 or 20 times in energy savings. But because the extra work would cause the project to be delivered a month later than planned, the whole idea went down the tubes since the rental agent party to the contract didn't want to lose a month's profits, IIRC correctly. So someone not wanting to lose a few thousand in personal profit blocked hundreds of thousands of dollars of savings for everyone else, to say nothing of the energy impact!!

I'd agree with ERD50 if the market were 100% free and 100% transparent, but you have to look at ALL the artificial incentives and disincentives built into the chain. We tend, I think, to have a simplistic notion that whoever builds the better/cheaper mousetrap will win out, and forget all the middle steps.

Between the Australian wine, the Californian wine and the Italian wine (assuming the raw materials and finished product are of equal quality and thus equally desirable to the end consumer who is willing to spend an equal amount of cash for each):

-Are the producers taxed equally at the corporate level?
-Are their workers paid equally (PPP)?
-Are the workers' insurance/disability/health costs subsidized or non-existent?
-Are workers' pensions mandated or optional/non-existent ?
-Are there gov't. mandated quality/safety controls? What are they and how much do they cost and are they effective?
-Are their energy costs taxed more highly or are they effectively subsidized?
-Is the land use taxed more highly or effectively subsidized?
-Are there import/export tariffs?
-Do they enjoy gov't. aid in promotion and advertising?
-Do they enjoy gov't. aid in R&D for better crop yield, better disease control, etc.?
-Do they assume some of the responsibility of being relatively environmentally friendly, even if not "organic".. or do they pass their burdens on to the gov't./locals for things like pesticide run-off?

And so on, and so on... and that's all before the product even gets out the door, for the most part. The free marketeers would probably blanch at the quantity of subsidies the US offers to certain domestic agribusinesses.

Without information, consumers can't effectively choose. We can only base our choices on the price and our limited perception of product quality. There will never be labels that say "this product is made by slave labor in the Marianas"; they will say "made in USA". There will never be labels that say "this apple has been irradiated". If a product is made in Mexico, we won't/don't want to see a photo of the raw sewage or open drums of toxic chemicals out back of the factory; we like that it's CHEAP!

I don't know the answer... but it's complicated, complicated, complicated.
No more supermarket olive oil for me, though. I'll pay the extra buck or two to get it down the street, where I see the local olives being ground and expressed right in front of my eyes. (Despite the lack of irradiation and hairnets.. )

ladelfina is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Taking Care of Mom Part III chinaco Other topics 7 06-18-2007 04:31 PM
Senator Wyden's "health care plan for all Americans" REWahoo Health and Early Retirement 81 12-19-2006 08:04 AM
Flexible Spending Accounts - Child and Dependent Care justin FIRE and Money 5 10-24-2006 03:19 PM
health insurance and effect on increased health care costs Martha Other topics 9 08-08-2006 01:54 PM
Krugman on Health Care Crisis JohnP FIRE and Money 50 03-07-2006 06:14 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:26 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.