calmloki
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Was working at an outdoor art fair yesterday and a cop working the show brought me $2 that someone had given him to put in lost & found. This show was packed - over 6000 through the gate. The $2 was naked - no envelope, no wallet, just 2 $1 bills. I was surprised that someone would turn it in, but it made me start thinking:
If I find a quarter on the ground I pick it up and pocket it. If I find $100 I would be looking for someone else to be responsible for it: lost and found. $5? probably going in my pocket after calling out to anyone nearby to ask if it was theirs. This all assumes there is no one nearby who might obviously have been recently using money - not seeing it near the line for fresh squeezed orange juice. This suggests to me that my morality is not fixed, but; shall we say, pragmatic. Makes me wonder if someone who makes $1,000,000/year has a similar but different threshold and a $100 find is de minimus and goes in their pocket.
So what are your moral dollar limits? Where, between "Finders keepers, losers weepers" and "If it's not mine it is someone else's and goes to lost and found" do you fall?
If I find a quarter on the ground I pick it up and pocket it. If I find $100 I would be looking for someone else to be responsible for it: lost and found. $5? probably going in my pocket after calling out to anyone nearby to ask if it was theirs. This all assumes there is no one nearby who might obviously have been recently using money - not seeing it near the line for fresh squeezed orange juice. This suggests to me that my morality is not fixed, but; shall we say, pragmatic. Makes me wonder if someone who makes $1,000,000/year has a similar but different threshold and a $100 find is de minimus and goes in their pocket.
So what are your moral dollar limits? Where, between "Finders keepers, losers weepers" and "If it's not mine it is someone else's and goes to lost and found" do you fall?