Join Early Retirement Today
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11-29-2007, 06:34 PM   #41
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
growing_older's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,659
Actually, I had some questions about the flat tax in Fred Thompson's proposal. Which is the topic of this thread, not the "Fair Tax" so please don't derail this into other tax topics that start with F. (Thanks)

If no one knows, then I can understand there might be no response to my questions. But if everyone ends up discussing other tax topics, then I don't know if my question is unanswerable, or just lost in the noise.

Does anyone know how Fred Thompson's optional flat tax proposal treats IRA, 401k, Roth and similar tax deferred or tax exempt accounts. If the income generated inside these accounts suddenly becomes taxable, then the optional flat tax part of the proposal seems a lot less useful to folks who have invested in these kinds of accounts.

growing_older is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 11-29-2007, 07:53 PM   #42
samclem's Avatar
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 11,927
growing older,

I've been thinking about this since you asked the question earlier (before the derailment). I haven't found an answer yet, the info at Thompson's campaign web site is not much more specific than my original post. Based on the "no other deductions" wording, I would guess that if a taxpayer elected to go with the flat rate, he could not deduct contributions to a (traditional) IRA or 401k. It is a little less clear whether the interest these accounts (as well as that earned by Roth IRAs and Roth 401Ks) earn each year would be tax-free (since it's non-reportable income, not technically a deduction, right?).

Again--Fred promised "simpler," but if you have to compute your taxes two different ways (three counting the AMT), it's not "simpler' at all.

samclem is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 08:13 PM   #43
Moderator Emeritus
Martha's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: minnesota
Posts: 13,212
The WSJ said that there was a lack of details regarding Thompson's plan, so there might not be info about how retirement accounts are treated.

No more lawyer stuff, no more political stuff, so no more CYA

Martha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 08:19 PM   #44
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
growing_older's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,659
Thanks, Samclem. I suspected that may be the kind of detail that a proposal hadn't worked out yet, but appreciate you trying to run it down.
growing_older is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 08:52 PM   #45
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Lakewood90712's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,377
IMHO , makes no never mind . The real problem is control of spending. Our federal (and my state CA) gov. is in the LBYM mode. that is, living BEYOND your means.
I'm not an Attorney , But I have watched " My Cousin Vinny " Several times.
Lakewood90712 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2007, 09:06 PM   #46
samclem's Avatar
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 11,927
Warning: Info below primarily of interest to political and tax reform junkies
I've continued to search for details on Thompson's tax proposal. The main question I (as well as Growing Older) and probably other folks have is: How would assets now in tax free (e.g. Roths) and tax deferred (e.g. TIRAs and 401Ks) be affected.

I haven't found specific answers, but found some clues/indicators.

First: Recall that Thompson's plan offers all filers the option of continuing to file using the present system of deductions/exemptions/credits, etc. Filing using the flat tax computation is strictly optional. So, at least nobody would end up worse off under the proposed plan.

Regarding the flat-tax computation: As mentioned above, I have not found any specific discussion concerning treatment of Roth (IRA or 401K), 401K, or TIRA by Thompson's campaign. Here's a link to his web site with info on the plan, but there aren't many details.
Thompson Plan for Tax Relief and New Economic Growth

His site does mention that his plan is based on a House of Reps Republican Study Committee (RSC) proposal. Here's a link to "details" of that plan:
(The link also compares the tax burden by income quintile between the present tax system and the proposed plan. I'd take that chart with a big grain of salt--people do modify their behavior in unpredictable ways in response to tax code changes)

The RSC plan does not address retirement accounts, but does say that Taxable Income = gross income - standard deduction ($25K for joint filers) - individual exemption ($3500 per person). I think that means that gains from tax-favored accounts are lumped into gross income and treated just like any other taxable gains.

Thompson's plan also taxes cap gains at a rate of 15%

What I think Thompson's plan should do:
- Keep the option to file using the regular system of deductions/etc. Nobody loses, no promises are broken.
- Flat Rate Computation: You get the benefit of the larger standard deduction and personal exemption. After that, the money you deposited into a Roth IRA, Roth 401K or a non-deductible TIRA can be withdrawn without being taxed (since you've already payed tax on it and it isn't new income). Gains from these accounts should be taxed at either your income rate or the 15% cap gains rate, whichever is lower (so, filers earning less than 100K pay 10%, those in the higher 25% bracket would pay 15%). Distributions of deposited principal from a deductible TIRA or 401K would be taxed at the individual's income tax rate, and gains would be taxed at the income rate or the cap gains rate, whichever is less.

I now like Thompson's plan (at least what I can tell/guess of it). The purist in me prefers a national retail sales tax, but the press (including the conservative press) has been savaging the "fair tax," and it's evident they haven't read the details of it. It is just too hard to explain/sell, and the special interests intent of preserving their piece of the pie will not let it live. Plus, the candidate pushing it (Huckabee) comes with some negatives (from my perspective) that I just can't ignore.

Thompson's plan does significantly reduce the destructive tendency of the government to meddle with investment flows, which will enhance efficient use of these funds by the private sector.

By allowing filers to keep computing their taxes as they do now, Thompson's plan becomes politically viable. If it were enacted in a form similar to its present one, I think most folks would file under the new flat tax computation. That would be okay at first, then I think political pressure would gradually build over the years for scrapping the deduction/special credit/BS laden system as it would be seen increasingly as a tool used by those with sharp pencils to avoid paying their share.

Or, the flat system could just start piling on special bells/whistles/loopholes/gimmies like the old code did, and my faith in humanity will be lost.

samclem is online now   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nightmare Proposal! Callie FIRE and Money 15 08-04-2007 08:54 PM
New Health Care Proposal -- If it happens what does it mean? chinaco FIRE and Money 9 06-11-2007 03:04 PM
Fred is creepimg me out brewer12345 Other topics 8 06-12-2006 04:56 PM
Indecent Proposal Eagle43 Other topics 30 08-17-2005 06:51 PM
Proposal for Tax Free Savings Accounts johnblake Other topics 5 08-14-2004 07:01 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:04 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.