Join Early Retirement Today
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 06-18-2007, 11:14 AM   #41
Dryer sheet aficionado
Rick S's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 45
ust a few wasted dollars - nothing compared to the fiasco we are burning our treasury on currently.
I think there are lots of things we should finance publicly, but I wish we'd look at them more as either/or. Yes, cleaning up our CO2 mess would be good.... but what doesn't get done instead. And, yes, we are burning our treasury on a fiasco right now... and there are many things that we could better spend money on, but our votes don't seem to count on that one.... that problem is a GW of another kind !

This life is a test... it is only a test. Had it been a real life, we would have been given further instructions on where to go and what to do.
Rick S is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 06-18-2007, 11:33 AM   #42
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
kcowan's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pacific latitude 20/49
Posts: 4,451
Send a message via Skype™ to kcowan
Originally Posted by Zathras View Post
...Yes, CO2 makes up a very small percentage of the overall atmosphere. That small amount makes a big difference to our global average temperature. If you doubt that fact, it is a very good place to attack the idea of GW as if you can disprove it, the whole GW argument falls apart. Now, the chemistry behind the way CO2 behaves is pretty well documented and understood. But if it can be disproved, please do.
Ironically, it is exactly the impact of CO2 or lack thereof that is the ehart of the debate.
Frankly, I would love to be proven wrong about GW. If I am wrong it means we won't see a lot of misery and hardship in the future due to GW.
GW has been proven to be happening since the mid-70s. It has followed 3 decades of global cooling. So GW is not the center of the debate. No one has explained to me why we had 3 decades of cooling during our most rapid industrial expansion after WWII.

Instead there seems to be name-calling.

Why did we continue to get GW even when Mount St Helen's and Mount Pinatubo erupted, spewing protective particles into the atmosphere? Inquiring minds want to know!

For the fun of it...Keith
kcowan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2007, 04:09 PM   #43
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
2B's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,330
I just couldn't pass up posting this link.

There IS a problem with global warming... it stopped in 1998 | St Opinion | Opinion | Telegraph
2B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2007, 07:46 PM   #44
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,629
2B, you can find lots of information on Opinion pages. Seriously, if you want information, read the actual research. Or at worst, read the watered down versions in popular media and follow the references they provide. If they don't provide references to research, be very skeptical.

We did get a cooling trend over the couple of years after Mt Pinatubo went off. Mt St. Helens threw much less material into the air. Although I am not sure if it had a measurable effect over global temps.

The cooling from the 40's to the early 70's appears to have been caused by the effect of sulfate aerosals in the atmosphere. Due to the combined effect of volcanoes and industrial polutants. See Climate myths: The cooling after 1940 shows CO2 does not cause warming - climate-change - 16 May 2007 - New Scientist Environment for full detail and references. It is interesting reading.

Zathras is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Most Intelligent Statement Made on Global Warming (IMO)... gindie Other topics 58 06-16-2007 06:44 PM
Global warming and financial positioning janeeyre FIRE and Money 274 04-18-2007 03:25 PM
The Great Global Warming Swindle dex Other topics 107 03-18-2007 07:41 PM
global warming real estate investment ideas? winnie Other topics 13 03-15-2007 06:12 PM
A New Global Warming Strategy marty Other topics 3 02-13-2007 07:54 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:26 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.