|
|
Goodness, What A Surprise! Looks Like Strauss Kahn May Have Been Unjustly Accused
06-30-2011, 10:31 PM
|
#1
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hooverville
Posts: 22,983
|
Goodness, What A Surprise! Looks Like Strauss Kahn May Have Been Unjustly Accused
The New York Times - Breaking News, World News & Multimedia
According to NYT, case near collapse. Accuser has ties to drug smuggling, money laundering and lied frequently in police interviews.
__________________
"As a general rule, the more dangerous or inappropriate a conversation, the more interesting it is."-Scott Adams
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
06-30-2011, 10:56 PM
|
#2
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,733
|
My if this true, I wonder where Strauss Kahn goes to get his job and reputation back.
|
|
|
07-01-2011, 02:04 AM
|
#3
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: midwestern city
Posts: 4,061
|
IMO he cannot get his reputation back. The damage has been too great.
Quote:
Originally Posted by clifp
My if this true, I wonder where Strauss Kahn goes to get his job and reputation back.
|
__________________
Very conservative with investments. Not ER'd yet, 48 years old. Please do not take anything I write or imply as legal, financial or medical advice directed to you. Contact your own financial advisor, healthcare provider, or attorney for financial, medical and legal advice.
|
|
|
07-01-2011, 04:44 AM
|
#4
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Palma de Mallorca
Posts: 1,419
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by obgyn65
IMO he cannot get his reputation back. The damage has been too great.
|
It will be ironic if he loses everything over something that he didn't do - or rather, which it can't be proved that he did - but there will be a sense of justice on behalf of all the women he has hurt over the years by abusing his power.
There are still a lot of unanswered questions in the case. The fact that an immigrant hotel maid knows people who are in jail does not entirely surprise me; nor does the idea that someone fleeing persecution in Africa might be a little untruthful on an official form. She had been working at that hotel for some time, so she didn't just get herself hired so she could sting this guy. We've not heard any suggestion that she got her shifts changed so that she could be cleaning DSK's room to give herself an opportunity to get to him. Nobody is disputing that sex took place, which generally requires, at the very least, a man to make a positive decision.
And even if it was consensual, and even if she walked into the room and said "How about it, big guy?": does anyone here think that it's remotely normal for the head of a major international organisation and potential candidate for President of a state with strategic nuclear weapons, to have a casual sexual encounter with a hotel employee ? What does that - on its own, without any need to dig into his past - tell us about him ?
|
|
|
07-01-2011, 04:54 AM
|
#5
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,733
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigNick
And even if it was consensual, and even if she walked into the room and said "How about it, big guy?": does anyone here think that it's remotely normal for the head of a major international organisation and potential candidate for President of a state with strategic nuclear weapons, to have a casual sexual encounter with a hotel employee ? What does that - on its own, without any need to dig into his past - tell us about him ?
|
All good points. But dare I say it puts him in pretty "good" company with both JFK, and Bill Clinton, who by all accounts where open to sex with any woman under 40 at pretty much any time. Correct me if I wrong but aren't mistresses, a stable of French political leaders?
Now I happen to agree with you and while I thought Ross Perot was a nut case. I did find myself shaking my head in agreement when explained why he fired workers who had affairs "if your wife can't trust you why the heck should I". I think that view is an increasingly uncommon one.
|
|
|
07-01-2011, 05:04 AM
|
#6
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 360
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by clifp
My if this true, I wonder where Strauss Kahn goes to get his job and reputation back.
|
He has lots of choices. Work at CNN, FOX, or as a U.S. Congressman.
|
|
|
07-01-2011, 05:28 AM
|
#7
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,072
|
He will get neither back.
It is turning into a he said/she said case.
He may get his freedom (reasonable doubt). If that happens and he is really good at what he does, someone in the industry will overlook his indiscretions and hire him.... but perhaps in a capacity that is in the background (out of public view).
If the criminal case goes away or the charges reduced (possibly plead away), she could still file suit. But if her credibility is shot... she may not prevail. A team of competent attorneys would likely rip her credibility to shreds. My guess, there would be a settlement!
|
|
|
07-01-2011, 06:39 AM
|
#8
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,499
|
As is usual, what is said by the media may not have a lot of facts. I'd sure like to read the court transcripts.
__________________
There must be moderation in everything, including moderation.
|
|
|
07-01-2011, 08:58 AM
|
#9
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,203
|
I agree with a lot of the post...
It does not mean it did not happen... Kahn's attorneys have already stated that he had sex with the woman, so he can not take that back now...
Lots of other women have come out and made similar accusations, so it seems likely that he did the deed...
Now, will he be convicted, with evidence beyond a reasonable doubt... probably not...
As far as heading a major country... I bet that almost every French president has had an affair... so not a difference there... the only thing that I would say is there can be a willing participant and a non-willing participant.... the second is the one that disturbes me...
|
|
|
07-01-2011, 09:51 AM
|
#10
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 7,108
|
I agree with Texas Proud.
__________________
Duck bjorn.
|
|
|
07-01-2011, 10:01 AM
|
#11
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigNick
And even if it was consensual, and even if she walked into the room and said "How about it, big guy?": does anyone here think that it's remotely normal for the head of a major international organisation and potential candidate for President of a state with strategic nuclear weapons, to have a casual sexual encounter with a hotel employee ? What does that - on its own, without any need to dig into his past - tell us about him ?
|
"What would it tell us about him?," you ask. Well, it would tell us the same thing about him as it would about her.
There is an episode of Seinfeld where George Costanza has sex at his office with the cleaning woman. When George doesn't want to be boyfriend-girlfriend with the cleaning woman, she goes to his boss and has George fired. Although the show doesn't go into any detail, the implication is that the cleaning woman is not fired. A man and woman have consensual sex in the office. The man is fired. The woman is not. Man bad. Woman good. An no, there was no power relationship here.
We see this throughout society ... Clinton, Spitzer, Schwarzenegger, Weiner. When a man engages in some sort of consensual but socially forbidden sexual behavior, the man is vilified, the woman is not. (And Gloria Allred always seems to turn up in these cases - she doesn't seem to recognize her own sexism.)
I can't speak about what happened with Strauss-Kahn and the hotel maid (in fact, the initial media reports made me think he was guilty). But if the hypothetical scenario you poise is true, why on earth would I vilify him? I find it ironic that it is politically incorrect to object to homosexuality but it is perfectly acceptable to condemn men for casual (consensual) sexual activities with women. More so, in the scenario you describe, it would mean that the hotel maid was using false accusations in an attempt to convict him of a felony. So if the incident really happened in this way, I wouldn't be condemning him or his behavior. Instead, I would be asking that she be sent to prison for 10 years for the false accusations meant to ruin another person's life.
|
|
|
07-01-2011, 10:05 AM
|
#12
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: No Where for Very Long
Posts: 769
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chinaco
My guess, there would be a settlement!
|
Perhaps it began as consentual, then the lady felt wronged and was advised to seek more?
__________________
|
|
|
07-01-2011, 10:07 AM
|
#13
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,645
|
I heard on a radio news show that there was also some unusual activity in the maids bank account.
|
|
|
07-01-2011, 11:30 AM
|
#14
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 12,597
|
It almost sounds like you are equating being gay, with being straight and promiscuous. Whether gay or straight, male or female, a person can be celibate, have a committed relationship, casual sex, be promiscuous, be a predator, whatever. I believe most people object to sexual predators of any type. People disagree on whether promiscuity is objectionable.
Amethyst
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawn
" I find it ironic that it is politically incorrect to object to homosexuality but it is perfectly acceptable to condemn men for casual (consensual) sexual activities with women. .
|
__________________
If you understood everything I say, you'd be me ~ Miles Davis
'There is only one success – to be able to spend your life in your own way.’ Christopher Morley.
Even a blind clock finds an acorn twice a day.
|
|
|
07-01-2011, 12:02 PM
|
#15
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Palma de Mallorca
Posts: 1,419
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawn
We see this throughout society ... Clinton, Spitzer, Schwarzenegger, Weiner. When a man engages in some sort of consensual but socially forbidden sexual behavior, the man is vilified, the woman is not.
|
I think you may be conflating "a man" with "a man who wants us to trust him with enormous amounts of power". I don't care if Jimmy from room service has a quickie with the maid. Good luck to Jimmy. I do care if Jimmy wants me to entrust him with the power to appoint governments and spend my tax dollars. That's why it's also entirely relevant what Wolfowitz got up to (consensually, apparently) with his g/f over at the World Bank.
|
|
|
07-01-2011, 12:10 PM
|
#16
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 7,108
|
In a he said - she said event the credibility of both is critical. He didn't deny the sex act but claimed it was consensual. She said it wasn't. He has a reputation for assertive sexual behavior with women. There was no reason during the hours and days right after this event not to believe her story and he was headed to France where we have no extradition treaty. I think the court acted appropriately.
Subsequent events put in question her credibility, which is critical for any prosecution of this case. She destroyed any chance for her to achieve justice assuming her initial claims were correct. Time to tell both parties have a nice day.
Given that the prosecution has learned new information about her activities I wonder if it will impact her residency status, and that of her daughter. The child may be the one most harmed.
What perplexes me is a statement made by someone in the press (aka, not reliable) that there has been interesting financial activity. It may be that there has been a pay off in return for taking actions which made the case not suitable for prosecution.
__________________
Duck bjorn.
|
|
|
07-01-2011, 12:45 PM
|
#17
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hooverville
Posts: 22,983
|
__________________
"As a general rule, the more dangerous or inappropriate a conversation, the more interesting it is."-Scott Adams
|
|
|
07-01-2011, 01:09 PM
|
#18
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,558
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigNick
I think you may be conflating "a man" with "a man who wants us to trust him with enormous amounts of power". I don't care if Jimmy from room service has a quickie with the maid. Good luck to Jimmy. I do care if Jimmy wants me to entrust him with the power to appoint governments and spend my tax dollars. That's why it's also entirely relevant what Wolfowitz got up to (consensually, apparently) with his g/f over at the World Bank.
|
+1 on statement regarding entrusting - goes to character
However, a bit of a re-direct on Wolfowitz - the Europeans can have a double-standard - affairs/etc OK for them, not for US citizens in world organizational executive positions - bit of resentment at times regarding US viewpoints and power... I deal with it a lot over here in my business. It's subtle, but there nonetheless.
__________________
Deserat aka Bridget
“We sleep soundly in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm.”
|
|
|
07-01-2011, 03:33 PM
|
#19
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigNick
I think you may be conflating "a man" with "a man who wants us to trust him with enormous amounts of power". I don't care if Jimmy from room service has a quickie with the maid. Good luck to Jimmy. I do care if Jimmy wants me to entrust him with the power to appoint governments and spend my tax dollars. That's why it's also entirely relevant what Wolfowitz got up to (consensually, apparently) with his g/f over at the World Bank.
|
I understand what you mean and I realize you are not specifically suggesting that this incident was consensual (you bring up a mere hypothetical). But what is wrong with sexual activity between two or more consenting adults? I am not clear why it matters who they are (Jimmy vs Strauss-Kahn). Is it wrong because Strauss-Kahn is married and has broken his wedding vows? Does this mean that divorced people can't be trusted because they have broken their "until death do us part" wedding vows?
Under your hypothetical scenario, all Strauss-Kahn did was have consensual relations with a maid. Is that worse than if Strauss-Khan announced that he was homosexual? Is that worse than if he and his wife said they were so called "swingers?" What does two adults in the privacy of a hotel room have to do with trust? I thought we were supposed to be tolerant of others and not care about what they do in the personal lives as long as they do not harm others.
|
|
|
07-01-2011, 03:42 PM
|
#20
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hooverville
Posts: 22,983
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawn
I understand what you mean and I realize you are not specifically suggesting that this incident was consensual (you bring up a mere hypothetical). But what is wrong with sexual activity between two or more consenting adults? I am not clear why it matters who they are (Jimmy vs Strauss-Kahn). Is it wrong because Strauss-Kahn is married and has broken his wedding vows? Does this mean that divorced people can't be trusted because they have broken their "until death do us part" wedding vows?
Under your hypothetical scenario, all Strauss-Kahn did was have consensual relations with a maid. Is that worse than if Strauss-Khan announced that he was homosexual? Is that worse than if he and his wife said they were so called "swingers?" What does two adults in the privacy of a hotel room have to do with trust? I thought we were supposed to be tolerant of others and not care about what they do in the personal lives as long as they do not harm others.
|
But you come to the world capital of judgmentalism with this scurrilous message?
Ha
__________________
"As a general rule, the more dangerous or inappropriate a conversation, the more interesting it is."-Scott Adams
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|