Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
HR 1585
Old 05-13-2007, 10:51 AM   #1
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
mickeyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: South Texas~29N/98W
Posts: 3,437
This week the full House Armed Services Committee approved its version of the FY2008 Defense Authorization Bill (H.R. 1585) retaining all the provisions above and adding many more.

The committee's action kicks off a flurry of defense bill activity. Next week, the full House is expected to vote on the Defense bill, and the Senate Armed Services Committee is expected to approve its own version of the bill.

Here's a summary of selected initiatives the House Armed Services Committee included in its bill this week:

TRICARE Fees - Bar any increase in fees for TRICARE Prime, TRICARE Standard and pharmacy copays before Oct. 1, 2008.

Medication Limitations - Authorize DoD to remove medications from the formulary if retail drug companies don't give DoD low cost, federal pricing.

Survivor Benefit Plan - Authorize surviving spouses that are also in receipt of the VA's dependency and indemnity compensation (DIC) a monthly payment of $40 beginning on October 1, 2007.

Military Pay Raise - Authorize a 3.5% military pay raise for 2008 - vs. the 3% proposed by the Defense Department.
__________________
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. Groucho Marx
In dire need of: faster horses, younger woman, older whiskey, more money.
mickeyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Re: HR 1585
Old 05-13-2007, 10:57 AM   #2
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 718
Well at least the raise is a bit more than inflation
Mwsinron is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: HR 1585
Old 05-13-2007, 11:01 AM   #3
Moderator Emeritus
Nords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Oahu
Posts: 19,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mwsinron
Well at least the raise is a bit more than inflation
I think the goal is to link military pay raises to the ECI, not the CPI.

But that seems to be more of a minimum than a requirement.
__________________
*
*
For more info see "About Me" in my profile.
I don't read every post anymore, so if you want me to respond then please mention my name or send me a PM. Thanks.
Nords is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: HR 1585
Old 05-13-2007, 11:14 AM   #4
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 718
Why would the DoD only ask for 3% vs the Committee recommending 3.5% ?
Mwsinron is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: HR 1585
Old 05-13-2007, 03:26 PM   #5
Moderator Emeritus
Nords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Oahu
Posts: 19,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mwsinron
Why would the DoD only ask for 3% vs the Committee recommending 3.5% ?
Politics.

DoD is probably pulling a number closer to someone's estimate of the ECI while Congress is trying to look like a hero to their constituents troops. Of course that smaller pay raise is also being defended by DoD as a necessary evil in an environment of severe fiscal austerity where they're negotiating bulk purchases of gas, bombs, & bullets. DoD would rather avoid a bigger payroll in favor of one-time retention bonuses, which I believe accounted for over $1B (that's billion) last year.

Wait until DoD & Congress square off about TRICARE premiums/reimbursements and retiree healthcare expenses. At least with Rumsfeld out of the picture the atmosphere is a tiny bit less contentious.

Working for MOAA, TMC, and the other veteran's lobbying organizations is a full-time job. Maybe that's why there are so few military ERs!
__________________
*
*
For more info see "About Me" in my profile.
I don't read every post anymore, so if you want me to respond then please mention my name or send me a PM. Thanks.
Nords is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Sponsor Link
» E-R.org on facebook

Other Social Knowledge forum communities:
Cooking Forum - Sailing Forum - Early Retirement - Airstream Trailer - Aquarium Forum - Royal Forum - Book Forum - Volkswagen Touareg Forum - Jeep Wrangler Forum - Mustang Forums - Whitewater Kayaking & Rafting Forum - Fiberglass RV Forum - RV Forum - Truck Conversion - U2 Music Forum - Campground Reviews - Forest River - Sunline Trailers - Fiat Forum - Retirement Calculator
Investing Channel
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:03 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.