Originally Posted by Cute Fuzzy Bunny
That would be the case if the primary location of the illegal immigrants wasnt california, new mexico, arizona and texas, much of which was formerly mexico...
omg, you're arguing for the rights of imperialist European invaders who took the land of Native Americans and occupied it? And now that someone else does the same thing to them (which they richly deserved! oh, the irony!@%1), you think they have a right to their property back? Imperialist stooge!!!
I have to admit, a lot of this "original land claims" stuff confuses me... people will come up with any ad hoc cutoff date, and new random rules, to determine who qualifies as having had their land stolen and who qualifies as being an evil occupier, usually with the end result that the people whom one likes are victims and the people whom one hates are occupiers. Oh well, different strokes for different folks.....