M Paquette
Moderator Emeritus
To be clear, CFLs will lower your bill (assuming like most you are on a watt-meter), and save energy compared to an incandescent, but they do use more energy than would appear. So from a conservation/environmental view, that ain't what they are cracked up to be. The energy savings is overstated.
In the past couple of years, better electronic 'ballasts' have been introduced for most CFL lamps. The newer ones have a power factor (that pesky voltage/current phase shift that hides inefficiency) very close to 1.0, just like incandescent, quartz halide, and similar resistive lights.
Oh, and don't waste your time/money on 'dimmable' CFLs. CFls and their big brother 4 foot tubes are all gas discharge lamps. These need a minimum voltage to kick on, and are really nonlinear for brightness vs voltage. The 'dimmable' ones that work best have a complex electronic ballast that senses a 'dimmed' power level and then lights one of two tubes. At higher settings it lights the second tube. Yeah, it's a three-way lamp with complex electronics produced as cheaply as possible by the lowest bidder.