|
12-19-2010, 05:22 PM
|
#1
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lake Livingston, Tx
Posts: 4,204
|
Lazy SS question
This is another what if. I have a niece that has worked off and on at various jobs that are covered by SS for about 20 years. She is now about 40 years old, and has an opportunity to be a teacher. Now if she teaches in Tx. she is covered by a retirement system that does not qualify for SS. In fact a couple of years ago, teachers would retire, take a job for a day or so that is covered by SS, and then apply for spousal SS. I understand they closed this loophole. However, does any one know what her status would be? Would she be eligible for SS on her record? Would she be eligible for spousal SS as her SS qualifying employment was before the loophole was close?
Never mind, looks like she would not be any SS.
__________________
If it is after 5:00 when I post I reserve the right to disavow anything I posted.
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
12-19-2010, 05:57 PM
|
#2
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 939
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rustic23
This is another what if. I have a niece that has worked off and on at various jobs that are covered by SS for about 20 years. She is now about 40 years old, and has an opportunity to be a teacher. Now if she teaches in Tx. she is covered by a retirement system that does not qualify for SS. In fact a couple of years ago, teachers would retire, take a job for a day or so that is covered by SS, and then apply for spousal SS. I understand they closed this loophole. However, does any one know what her status would be? Would she be eligible for SS on her record? Would she be eligible for spousal SS as her SS qualifying employment was before the loophole was close?
Never mind, looks like she would not be any SS.
|
Unless it's offset by the Texas school retirement, if she made money for 40 quarters (10 years) and paid SS, she gets it on her record. At least that is my understanding of it. They may have changed the definition slightly. But 20 years should more than do it.
The teachers that retired and worked a day...? I don't understand that - maybe they hadn't worked in a job that paid in to SS?
Disclaimer: not an attorney, etc.!
__________________
I used to be “Thinker25” here. Retired at 62, now 73 (in 2021), no regrets & single again. I love it. I’m in RI.
|
|
|
12-19-2010, 06:34 PM
|
#3
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lake Livingston, Tx
Posts: 4,204
|
That's right, they had no SS history. I found several cases on the web that says if she qualifies for Texas Retirement, she looses her SS and her claim to spousal. Now, I wonder which is right.
__________________
If it is after 5:00 when I post I reserve the right to disavow anything I posted.
|
|
|
12-19-2010, 06:49 PM
|
#4
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bossier City
Posts: 2,183
|
Google Windfall Elimination Provision. It applies to federal employees (like me) and other public employees (state employees etc) who have pension plans that don't require that they pay into Social Security. I'm no expert on WEP, but basically, if you're coverend under such a plan, then you will be penalized unless you have 30 full years of "qualified" contributions into SS. A "qualified" year is one in which your social security covered income meets some pre-determined minimum threshold. Again..no expert, and only shooting from the hip...I believe that this year that qualified income would have to be somewhere around $30,000 or so.
In my personal situation, I worked during high school in SS covered jobs, making not much money, but still enough to earn SS "quarters". Then, while on active duty, the same situation. Once I went to work for the federal government as a civilian employee in 1981, I was no longer paying into SS. Sort of. Since I WAS a reservist, I was paying in a small amount each month, but that amount was too small to really count for anything. So....basically...I earned my rights to a future SS check when I reach the required age, because I did earn the minimum of 40 Quarters, but since I only paid in a small amount, and that contribution was mostly way back in the 70's & early 80's, and from then on I was covered under a public pension system in which no SS taxes were witheld, when I begin receiving my SS payment, it will be reduced by approximately 55%. If I start getting SS at age 62 (9 yrs from now) it will only be around $300.
I know I've left out a lot, so best bet is to google WEP/Windfall Elimination Provision. I expect you can find good info on it at the SS website as well. They recently sent me some WEP info in the mail.
__________________
“Change is the law of life. And those who look only to the past or present are certain to miss the future.”
-John F. Kennedy
“Hard work never killed anybody, but why take a chance?” - Edgar Bergen
|
|
|
12-19-2010, 06:56 PM
|
#5
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bossier City
Posts: 2,183
|
Just for clarification...all federal employees since 1984 DO contribute to Social Security through payroll taxes just like everybody else in the private sector. I began my federal career in 1981, so I fall under the "old" CSRS, which is why I'm only going to get a small SS payment when the time comes. Not complaining, I bought my ticket and took my chances. No regrets.
__________________
“Change is the law of life. And those who look only to the past or present are certain to miss the future.”
-John F. Kennedy
“Hard work never killed anybody, but why take a chance?” - Edgar Bergen
|
|
|
12-19-2010, 08:48 PM
|
#6
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 13,186
|
Go to the SS site and search WEP and GPO. WEP reduces the amount of SS your neice would receive based on her own work record. GPO reduces or eliminates the amount she would receive based on her spouse's work record.
We have also discussed this on this site as well. So you could search here too.
__________________
"I wasn't born blue blood. I was born blue-collar." John Wort Hannam
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|