Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-26-2008, 09:07 AM   #21
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Dawg52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Central MS/Orange Beach, AL
Posts: 9,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gumby View Post
It is quite possible that one can dislike both of them.
Yup.
__________________
Retired 3/31/2007@52
Investing style: Full time wuss.
Dawg52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 01-26-2008, 09:24 AM   #22
Moderator Emeritus
Martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: minnesota
Posts: 13,228
OK, I stay away from politics, but this Chris Rock video is funny:

glumbert - Chris Rock's 2008 Election Analysis
__________________
.


No more lawyer stuff, no more political stuff, so no more CYA

Martha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 11:07 AM   #23
Moderator Emeritus
Nords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Oahu
Posts: 26,856
Quote:
Less than a year away...
Brewer, dude, I thought this thread was going to be your announcement that bulk shippers have greatly accelerated your ER plans.

Or that your employer had finally realized the value of your contributions and was recognizing them in a fiscally-appropriate manner.

But I can see that work doesn't appear to be improving your disposition.
__________________
*

Co-author (with my daughter) of “Raising Your Money-Savvy Family For Next Generation Financial Independence.”
Author of the book written on E-R.org: "The Military Guide to Financial Independence and Retirement."

I don't spend much time here— please send a PM.
Nords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 12:26 PM   #24
Recycles dryer sheets
Arc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 372
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gumby View Post
When will you people ever learn that even if Clinton was the Devil incarnate, that does not excuse GWB's actions over the last seven years? If you want to defend the Shrub's actions and character, go ahead, but comparing them to Clinton is no way to go about it. Just as it would be wrong to say Clinton must have been a good president just because he is not Bush. It is quite possible that one can dislike both of them.
Obviously you don't like Bush's actions - I respect that. I know you won't agree but every day that goes by that we are not attacked - I give Bush credit. There are people out there that very much want to see you and me dead only because we are Americans - and they felt that way before GW entered politics. I expect my president to address that - in fact protecting the homeland is one of the few things government does these days that is actually in the Constitution. Additionally, his actions have the potential to change the world - I hope and pray that it is for the positive.

And I didn't like Clinton's actions. The president is the top leadership position in this country - hands down. Uncontested fundamentals of leadership include integrity and honesty - Clinton failed miserably here a(and not only with Lewinsky) and therefore since he cannot be trusted I cannot follow him. How so many people give him a pass on this basic flaw is beyond me.

You and others will say that Bush is not honest either and I will disagree. Time may prove him wrong - and I don't agree with everything he does - but I do believe he acts based on strong convictions and believes he is acting in the best interest of the country.

I don't claim to have it right all of the time - I just try to keep things simple. I guess politics just aren't that simple.
Arc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 12:34 PM   #25
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
maddythebeagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by brewer12345 View Post
Great, now I know better than to post this stuff. The first reply is from a nutball on my ignore list...
which one...
__________________
- Hurry! to the cliffs of insanity!
maddythebeagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 04:01 PM   #26
Administrator
Gumby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 22,972
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arc View Post
Obviously you don't like Bush's actions - I respect that. I know you won't agree but every day that goes by that we are not attacked - I give Bush credit. There are people out there that very much want to see you and me dead only because we are Americans - and they felt that way before GW entered politics. I expect my president to address that - in fact protecting the homeland is one of the few things government does these days that is actually in the Constitution. Additionally, his actions have the potential to change the world - I hope and pray that it is for the positive.

And I didn't like Clinton's actions. The president is the top leadership position in this country - hands down. Uncontested fundamentals of leadership include integrity and honesty - Clinton failed miserably here a(and not only with Lewinsky) and therefore since he cannot be trusted I cannot follow him. How so many people give him a pass on this basic flaw is beyond me.

You and others will say that Bush is not honest either and I will disagree. Time may prove him wrong - and I don't agree with everything he does - but I do believe he acts based on strong convictions and believes he is acting in the best interest of the country.

I don't claim to have it right all of the time - I just try to keep things simple. I guess politics just aren't that simple.
My point was not so much whether we agree or disagree on GWB. To give you some perspective, I did not like Clinton; I voted for Perot both times. Rather, my complaint is about those who will defend Bush by attacking Clinton, or vice versa. They both may be good, both bad, or one good and one bad, but that is irrelevant. Each should be judged against the ideal we set for our presidents. An example would be defending Stalin by pointing out all the bad things that Hit....(his neighbor to the West) did. Both of them were astonishingly evil, regardless of what his neighbor did.

And while we are on logical fallacies -- one cannot prove a negative. Thus, the fact that a terrorist attack has not happened in this country since 9/11 may be due to the great work of the current Administration, but then again, maybe the terrorists got sick, hit by a bus or just haven't gotten around to it yet. You can't prove it either way.

Finally, strong convictions and a belief that you are doing the Lord's work are of no help when one is a complete idiot. David Koresh had both and look where he ended up.
__________________
Living an analog life in the Digital Age.
Gumby is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 04:47 PM   #27
Recycles dryer sheets
Arc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 372
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gumby View Post
And while we are on logical fallacies -- one cannot prove a negative. Thus, the fact that a terrorist attack has not happened in this country since 9/11 may be due to the great work of the current Administration, but then again, maybe the terrorists got sick, hit by a bus or just haven't gotten around to it yet. You can't prove it either way.
While your point of logic stands to reason in a textbook - I beg to differ from a real world perspective. Again there are people staying up nights figuring out how to kill you and me - there have been several attempts thwarted. Give the administration a little credit here - you can't really think that no successful attacks since 9/11 is a coincidence? (pardon the double negative)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gumby View Post
Finally, strong convictions and a belief that you are doing the Lord's work are of no help when one is a complete idiot. David Koresh had both and look where he ended up.
With all due respect, I don't remember David Koresh being on the ballot for any political office. Although you may not like him, Bush did rise to be the man elected for the highest office of the most revered country on the planet. If idiot is an appropriate word then God help us all.

And at the risk of another comparison with Clinton - WJC is far from dumb - in fact he may be one of the shrewdest politicians of modern times - where he falls short is in integrity and honesty. You just don't know if his actions are conducted for our best interest or his.

Putting him in terms that we can all understand - Imagine if WJC was your boss at work and you were talented and a threat to displace him. Think about it.
Arc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 05:22 PM   #28
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Lawn chair in Texas
Posts: 14,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arc View Post
If idiot is an appropriate word then God help us all.
Amen!
__________________
Have Funds, Will Retire

...not doing anything of true substance...
HFWR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 07:07 PM   #29
Administrator
Gumby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 22,972
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arc View Post
While your point of logic stands to reason in a textbook - I beg to differ from a real world perspective. Again there are people staying up nights figuring out how to kill you and me - there have been several attempts thwarted. Give the administration a little credit here - you can't really think that no successful attacks since 9/11 is a coincidence? (pardon the double negative)



With all due respect, I don't remember David Koresh being on the ballot for any political office. Although you may not like him, Bush did rise to be the man elected for the highest office of the most revered country on the planet. If idiot is an appropriate word then God help us all.

And at the risk of another comparison with Clinton - WJC is far from dumb - in fact he may be one of the shrewdest politicians of modern times - where he falls short is in integrity and honesty. You just don't know if his actions are conducted for our best interest or his.

Putting him in terms that we can all understand - Imagine if WJC was your boss at work and you were talented and a threat to displace him. Think about it.
Once again -- I do not care about Clinton. If Bush is your man, defend him without reference to Clinton's faults. I say GWB is: a) evil and b) stupid. Convince me he is not.

P.S. -- How do you know people are "staying up nights figuring out how to kill you and me"? I don't flatter myself enough to think that anyone is trying to kill me. And what specific attempts have been thwarted? How do you know?

It seems to me that you have been drinking the Administration kool-aid -- "There are people trying to kill you. Only we can keep you safe. You must surrender your civil liberties so we can continue to protect you. Don't look at that man behind the curtain." Try reading George Orwell's "1984". You will find many parallels to our current situation.
__________________
Living an analog life in the Digital Age.
Gumby is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 07:44 PM   #30
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 445
Quote:
Originally Posted by brewer12345 View Post
Great, now I know better than to post this stuff. The first reply is from a nutball on my ignore list...
naw, I think this a good summary, although I think the writer could have substantiated it a bit more with more precise writing. Also address GWB's enviromental impact.
P.S. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 08:45 PM   #31
Recycles dryer sheets
Arc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 372
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gumby View Post
I say GWB is: a) evil and b) stupid. Convince me he is not.
Not interested in trying to change your mind. Do like the banter back and forth though - forces me to think through things and put thoughts into words.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gumby View Post
P.S. -- I don't flatter myself enough to think that anyone is trying to kill me.
I'm sure many of the thousands who died in the Twin Towers felt the same way.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gumby View Post
It seems to me that you have been drinking the Administration kool-aid -- "There are people trying to kill you. Only we can keep you safe. You must surrender your civil liberties so we can continue to protect you. Don't look at that man behind the curtain." Try reading George Orwell's "1984". You will find many parallels to our current situation.
I don't know about that. I just like the fact that the administration isn't putting its head in the sand on this one.
Arc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 09:11 PM   #32
Gone but not forgotten
Khan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,924
Send a message via AIM to Khan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gumby
P.S. -- I don't flatter myself enough to think that anyone is trying to kill me.

I'm sure many of the thousands who died in the Twin Towers felt the same way.
==========
What did that have to do with Iraq?
__________________
"Knowin' no one nowhere's gonna miss us when we're gone..."
Khan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 09:14 PM   #33
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 126
GW is probably the most lambasted president in US history. A lot of that is due to his lack of "slickness"; he's an easy target. The media and the blue-staters, who admittedly lost a very close election, are the ones making all the noise about Iraq being a total farce. Those of us who put the man in office are patiently waiting to see the endgame, knowing that our military and intelligence agencies have information that CNN doesn't. WMDs might have nothing to do with our decision to oust Hussein. It's called propaganda and misdirection. GW is man enough to take the heat because he's trying to accomplish something that will protect the entire planet. Wait and see. I think McCain is going to be the next President, but I bet if a Dem wins, we still finish the mission. BTW, my nephew is a Marine, has been there, and is going back.
Gazingus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 11:03 PM   #34
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 445
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gazingus View Post
GW is probably the most lambasted president in US history. A lot of that is due to his lack of "slickness"; he's an easy target. The media and the blue-staters, who admittedly lost a very close election, are the ones making all the noise about Iraq being a total farce. Those of us who put the man in office are patiently waiting to see the endgame, knowing that our military and intelligence agencies have information that CNN doesn't. WMDs might have nothing to do with our decision to oust Hussein. It's called propaganda and misdirection. GW is man enough to take the heat because he's trying to accomplish something that will protect the entire planet. Wait and see. I think McCain is going to be the next President, but I bet if a Dem wins, we still finish the mission. BTW, my nephew is a Marine, has been there, and is going back.
GW is probably the most lambasted president in US history-> this is a logical outcome of unnecessarily starting a war, or at least 4 years later, still not presenting an acceptable argument for those lambasting.

A lot of that is due to his lack of "slickness"; he's an easy target-> a C student, who spent the first major part of his life drinking and losing other people's money, eventually getting himself elected... this ain't slick? And what's up with that accent acquired after most language skills are established.

Those of us who put the man in office are patiently waiting to see the endgame-> polls consistently show this "patient" mass voting dislike of GWB.

knowing that our military and intelligence agencies have information that CNN doesn't-> this I really find hard to believe, though am neither a student of history nor politics. A quick perusal of past wars I think shows no great truth unveiled after any war that wasn't intrinsically understood during armed conflict, and this before internet, CNN, satellite. Lots of books may be written, dissertations accomplished, but the general perception seems to remain the same.

GW is man enough to take the heat because he's trying to accomplish something that will protect the entire planet-> read protect oil and line the pockets of his cronies donors friends associates.

BTW, my nephew is a Marine, has been there, and is going back-> I hope he stays safe.
P.S. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 11:16 PM   #35
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 581
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arc View Post
Since the true measure of a presidency is not determined until long after he is out of office - don't be surprised if GW goes down as a good one. Afterall, he was president during a very rare time in our history - being attacked on our own soil. And - if by chance - the muslim terrorist threat goes the way of the Nazi's - my guess is Bush will get his share of the credit. His poll ratings will mean nothing then.

I'm finding it interesting to compare the "legacy opportunity" for Clinton and Bush - and am thinking that the history books will much kinder to Bush. Just my gut feel.
And what legacy might that be for Bush? That he had one of, if not the lowest approval ratings in history? I actually voted for him the first time sorry to say...but eventually he just didn't point our country in the direction that I liked. A vast majority of Americans seem to agree with me on this at this point. Unfortunately we don't have the ability of a perspective of far out into the future to view him so we can only go on what we know now...that he got us into an unnecessary war at great cost to our country.
DallasGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2008, 04:50 AM   #36
Recycles dryer sheets
Arc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 372
Quote:
Originally Posted by DallasGuy View Post
Unfortunately we don't have the ability of a perspective of far out into the future to view him so we can only go on what we know now...that .
Thanks for re-making my original point. Time will tell and it is possible that those of us alive today will not be the ones writing the legacy. Those who are not as emotionally attached who have the luxury of looking at the long term impact of the decisions that we either like or dislike today - they will have the most say. And I'm not saying it will be great - though I am praying that it will be positive.

Isn't this fun?
Arc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2008, 06:29 AM   #37
gone traveling
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,146
Didn't the president say he would get Bin Laden ? While wearing the NYFD helmet dead or alive?

Not much time left for that huh?
dumpster56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2008, 08:44 AM   #38
Recycles dryer sheets
Arc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 372
Quote:
Originally Posted by newguy888 View Post
Didn't the president say he would get Bin Laden ? While wearing the NYFD helmet dead or alive?

Not much time left for that huh?
I don't get the point?? Have we given up trying?

I keep things simple and assume that we have some very smart military people who have as their sole objective - get Bin Laden. The fact that they have not captured him yet makes me think it is difficult.
Arc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2008, 10:02 AM   #39
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
ladelfina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,713
Mmmm that's why the Bush admin. whisked all the bin Ladens out of the country whilst no one else was flying on 9/11-9/12.. That's why Bush said, on multiple occasions, he's "not that concerned about him". And that "it's not our priority." I'm not really a conspiracy theorist.. but I don't see the energy coming from above. I see a lot of energy going towards tapping our phones, though.

In life, Arc, simplicity, especially willful simplicity, will only get you so far.

U.S. Concludes Bin Laden Escaped at Tora Bora Fight (washingtonpost.com)
This is and has been a non-story as far as I can tell.. Imagine if it were something they could hang around Clinton's neck, though... Just sayin'.

Of course I know SOME people are trying.. but if we didn't have this minor Iraq distraction (for which Bush had a hard-on by and before 2000) couldn't SOME of those resources of 150,000 troops and SOME of those billions and trillions (now $275 million PER DAY) could go toward teaching our folks Arabic and Urdu and Pashto and seriously bribing some warloards to smoke out bin Laden, no? Instead of us taxpayers paying to send Bush wonks to (ha!) try and eradicate their opium fields.. their only apparent source of income?
ladelfina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2008, 10:34 AM   #40
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Fireup2020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,250
IMHO, all of our presidents are dirty. Comes with the territory. Since I will never be president, there will never be a president I wholehartedly agree with
__________________
Make no mistake, my friend, it takes more than money to make men rich. - A. P. Gouthey
Fireup2020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
It's been a year My Dream Other topics 9 11-08-2007 01:45 PM
55 year old Texan will retire within the next year russingr Hi, I am... 7 05-25-2007 08:40 AM
1 Year Later babyape Life after FIRE 18 04-07-2007 02:23 AM
Your TOTAL % return so far this year and last year. modhatter FIRE and Money 49 10-19-2006 04:03 AM
44 year old woman takes advantage of 13 year old boy Dawg52 Other topics 37 05-24-2006 11:15 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:55 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.