yakers
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Sounds like what we need is a Hispanic scantilly clad lady choir and it might get me back to church.
My two bits: I believe immigration makes this country great, but something went wrong when we decided that a melting pot was a bad idea, and that immigrants should be encouraged to not think of themselves as Americans first. We risk fragmentation and rising strife in the name of "preserving social identity" or whatever. I mean, I feel no need to speak Celtic (Gaelic?) or fly the Irish or Lithuanian flag over my house.
Si, Senor. Necessito hablar Espanol. No comprendemos Ingles!Cute n' Fuzzy Bunny said:So hypothetical question...at the point in time where hispanics become the majority in the US, does that mean all the indigent, uneducated white people have to learn spanish?
I am considering the possibility. Maybe the 2.5rd world.If I wanted to live in the third world I would move there.
I suppose I am a horde myself. I do strive to fit in as much as possible, and not bring attention to my foreignness or let it become an issue. In return, at least where I work, most people treat me like anybody else. When the rare d***weed insists on treating me like a foreigner, I try to extricate myself from the exchange non-confrontationally, rather than throttling them as any red-blooded American would. I guess that in itself is a form of assimilation...
Bpp
Canada's lax refugee policy is in urgent need of an overhaul
The Province
Published: Thursday, March 02, 2006
While Canadians have long congratulated themselves on their country's openness and generosity to people fleeing persecution in foreign lands, the view from abroad is somewhat less benign.
In fact, the ease with which refugee claimants can take up residence here, drawing generous welfare benefits and taking advantage of a sympathetic judicial system, risks turning us into an international laughing stock.
Such, at least, is the broad conclusion drawn by former diplomat Martin Collacott in a report for the right-wing Fraser Institute: Canada's Inadequate Response to Terrorism: The Need for Policy Reform.
And there is a great deal in this report that makes perfect sense and demands immediate political action.
But we should make it clear from the start that we are not talking here about bona fide refugees who come here after being duly processed by the proper authorities.
No, the problems Collacott identifies relate almost entirely to "refugee claimants," or self-serving economic migrants who show up unannounced, often without documents.
Disturbingly, Collacott estimates that as many as 45,000 "claimants" have simply disappeared in Canada over the past half dozen years, after failing to show up for scheduled hearings into their refugee claims.
Among them (although admittedly the proportion is low) are convicted terrorists, murderous gang leaders, drug dealers and other dangerous thugs.
That so many of them should remain at liberty for so long is a national disgrace. And yet Collacott describes a scandalous, politically motivated policy that works in their favour -- to the huge disadvantage of Canadian taxpayers, who foot an annual bill as high as $4 billion to sustain it.
He cites a glaring flaw in our much-vaunted Charter of Rights which, astonishingly, gives claimants rights identical to those of Canadian citizens the moment they set foot on Canadian soil.
It is abundantly clear from Collacott's report that Canada's well-meaning efforts to make the country a sanctuary for genuine refugees have drifted into a mismanaged, bureaucratic chaos that cries out for a comprehensive overhaul.
The previous Liberal government, largely for electoral reasons, shamefully shirked its responsibilities in this regard.
Prime Minister Stephen Harper's Conservative government should not make the same mistake.