Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
New housing data from the Census Bureau
Old 06-03-2014, 10:04 AM   #1
Moderator
MichaelB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Rocky Inlets
Posts: 24,492
New housing data from the Census Bureau

The Census Bureau published some housing data yesterday and a new milestone was reached. The median size of a new house is 2384 square feet. The previous high was 2277 sf, back in 2007, and way back in 1973 when my folks were home buyers the median size was 1525 sf. Housing is a good an indicator of standard of living, and this shows that despite all the naysayers the standard is still improving in the US.

Here's a neat infographic from the Census Bureau New Single-Family Homes in 2013 this is their main page for housing data Characteristics of New Housing and here is a good summary from WonkBlog The housing crash did nothing to tamp our appetite for enormous houses
__________________

__________________
MichaelB is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 06-03-2014, 10:07 AM   #2
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
REWahoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 42,142
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB View Post
The median size of a new house is 2384 square feet.
I knew if I lived long enough I'd evenutally be average median.
__________________

__________________
Numbers is hard

When I hit 70, it hit back

Retired in 2005 at age 58, no pension
REWahoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2014, 10:32 AM   #3
Moderator Emeritus
Bestwifeever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB View Post
The Census Bureau published some housing data yesterday and a new milestone was reached. The median size of a new house is 2384 square feet. The previous high was 2277 sf, back in 2007, and way back in 1973 when my folks were home buyers the median size was 1525 sf....
I don't know if this is on the Freakonomics guys' radar, but this nicely supports my theory that we increase in size to match our environment: big houses, big cars (minivans, SUVs, pickup trucks), big people. Coincidence? Hmmmm.

Not to mention the Big Gulp, born in 1980.
__________________
“Would you like an adventure now, or would you like to have your tea first?” J.M. Barrie, Peter Pan
Bestwifeever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2014, 11:17 AM   #4
Administrator
W2R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 38,937
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB View Post
The Census Bureau published some housing data yesterday and a new milestone was reached. The median size of a new house is 2384 square feet. The previous high was 2277 sf, back in 2007, and way back in 1973 when my folks were home buyers the median size was 1525 sf. Housing is a good an indicator of standard of living, and this shows that despite all the naysayers the standard is still improving in the US.

Here's a neat infographic from the Census Bureau New Single-Family Homes in 2013 this is their main page for housing data Characteristics of New Housing and here is a good summary from WonkBlog The housing crash did nothing to tamp our appetite for enormous houses
Fascinating!

I still remember that back in the 1950's, most houses seemed to have just one bathroom. Now, new houses mostly seem to have at least two, or even more. That is a HUGE improvement for most families.

Edited to add: My hypothesis is that it is harder to get mortgages than it once was, but that the (few) mortgages granted are larger than they once were. But then, that is just a guess. I have no idea.
__________________
Already we are boldly launched upon the deep; but soon we shall be lost in its unshored, harbourless immensities.

- - H. Melville, 1851
W2R is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2014, 11:32 AM   #5
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Midpack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 11,982
That surprises me, disappointed to be truthful. I remember hearing average home size was dropping after the '08 recession, and that the 'McMansion era was over,' good riddance IMO. But that's clearly not the case after all. It appears the collective "we" may not have fully learned to appreciate living within our means. Which led me to search for the chart below, another strike against common sense LBYM evidently. Doesn't bode well for any of us.

Guess the income inequality debate may be exaggerated as well?

We're now happily below average home size, and plan to downsize further with our next move.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image.jpg (68.3 KB, 27 views)
__________________
No one agrees with other people's opinions; they merely agree with their own opinions -- expressed by somebody else. Sydney Tremayne
Retired Jun 2011 at age 57

Target AA: 60% equity funds / 35% bond funds / 5% cash
Target WR: Approx 2.5% Approx 20% SI (secure income, SS only)
Midpack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2014, 11:38 AM   #6
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
NW-Bound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 19,444
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB View Post
... this shows that despite all the naysayers the standard is still improving in the US...
... even if we will have to eat cat food larvae in order to free up cash to pay for the McMansion.
__________________
"Old age is the most unexpected of all things that can happen to a man" -- Leon Trotsky
NW-Bound is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2014, 12:29 PM   #7
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
zinger1457's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,455
I'm sure the one thing that is way above the average/median with new home construction is the income of those building and buying them.
__________________
zinger1457 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2014, 01:23 PM   #8
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,495
Quote:
Originally Posted by Midpack View Post
That surprises me, disappointed to be truthful. I remember hearing average home size was dropping after the '08 recession, and that the 'McMansion era was over,' good riddance IMO. But that's clearly not the case after all. It appears the collective "we" may not have fully learned to appreciate living within our means. Which led me to search for the chart below, another strike against common sense LBYM evidently. Doesn't bode well for any of us.

Guess the income inequality debate may be exaggerated as well?

We're now happily below average home size, and plan to downsize further with our next move.
+1
Very surprising, considering 1 in 8 males between the ages of 25-54 isn't working, the median income in this country is $25K, average household income is $50K, average retirement account is less than $100K, among other statistics too numerous to mention. It appears the middle class has learned nothing from the recent economic meltdown and I agree that this doesn't bode well for the rest of us.

I, too, am happily below the "average" home and plan to downsize further for the next move.
__________________
Options is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2014, 02:16 PM   #9
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
REWahoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 42,142
Meanwhile, half of Americans can’t afford their house:

Quote:
Over half of Americans (52%) have had to make at least one major sacrifice in order to cover their rent or mortgage over the last three years, according to the “How Housing Matters Survey,” which was commissioned by the nonprofit John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and carried out by Hart Research Associates. These sacrifices include getting a second job, deferring saving for retirement, cutting back on health care, running up credit card debt, or even moving to a less safe neighborhood or one with worse schools.
__________________
Numbers is hard

When I hit 70, it hit back

Retired in 2005 at age 58, no pension
REWahoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2014, 02:36 PM   #10
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Midpack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 11,982
So "we" are building a house of cards again...wonderful.
__________________
No one agrees with other people's opinions; they merely agree with their own opinions -- expressed by somebody else. Sydney Tremayne
Retired Jun 2011 at age 57

Target AA: 60% equity funds / 35% bond funds / 5% cash
Target WR: Approx 2.5% Approx 20% SI (secure income, SS only)
Midpack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2014, 02:42 PM   #11
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
NW-Bound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 19,444
People's collective memory is getting shorter. Society is suffering more from ADHD. All we can do is to protect ourselves, and if you are gutsy, even to profit.

In the period of 2003-2007, I had good gains on housing related stocks such as steel and cement producers. These are still not doing that well, so we are nowhere in a bubble.

__________________
"Old age is the most unexpected of all things that can happen to a man" -- Leon Trotsky
NW-Bound is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2014, 02:45 PM   #12
Moderator
Walt34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Eastern WV Panhandle
Posts: 16,579
Quote:
Originally Posted by Midpack View Post
Which led me to search for the chart below, another strike against common sense LBYM evidently. Doesn't bode well for any of us.
Well, it depends on which "us" you're referring to - the U.S. population, or the er.org members. It bodes pretty well for the latter since all those working people will keep SS solvent.

We're well below average house size too.
__________________
I heard the call to do nothing. So I answered it.
Walt34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2014, 02:49 PM   #13
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,264
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bestwifeever View Post
I don't know if this is on the Freakonomics guys' radar, but this nicely supports my theory that we increase in size to match our environment: big houses, big cars (minivans, SUVs, pickup trucks), big people. Coincidence? Hmmmm.

Not to mention the Big Gulp, born in 1980.
The bigger, the better, didn't you know?
__________________
tmm99 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2014, 02:51 PM   #14
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,264
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bestwifeever View Post
I don't know if this is on the Freakonomics guys' radar, but this nicely supports my theory that we increase in size to match our environment: big houses, big cars (minivans, SUVs, pickup trucks), big people. Coincidence? Hmmmm.

Not to mention the Big Gulp, born in 1980.
No, all the jokes aside, It's no coincidence IMO...
__________________
tmm99 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2014, 03:11 PM   #15
Moderator
MichaelB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Rocky Inlets
Posts: 24,492
Quote:
Originally Posted by REWahoo View Post
Excellent link.

There's a big difference between the new housing being built and purchased in 2014 vs 2007, because credit today is being extended to people that can afford it. Definitely not the case 7 years ago. 10% of mortgages (from back then) are still underwater and another 20% have little or no equity. That'll take a few more years to work off.

New housing today is being built at half the rate of 10 years ago, so this is no sign of a new wave of overextending . Is it wasteful? Probably yes, but who cares how others spend their money? The median sf is probably overstated because the mix has a greater weighting of upper income people compared with past periods and will trend lower as more lower priced housing enters the mix.

New single family housing construction is slowing but milti-family is picking up. If this means that more lower income people are renting and only higher income folks are buying, that's a sign that people are showing greater financial responsibility.
__________________
MichaelB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2014, 03:55 PM   #16
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Midpack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 11,982
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB View Post
New single family housing construction is slowing but milti-family is picking up. If this means that more lower income people are renting and only higher income folks are buying, that's a sign that people are showing greater financial responsibility.
I'd be more encouraged if not for the personal savings rate trend (different x-axis than earlier attachment) which I searched for as a result of this thread.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image.jpg (59.2 KB, 11 views)
__________________
No one agrees with other people's opinions; they merely agree with their own opinions -- expressed by somebody else. Sydney Tremayne
Retired Jun 2011 at age 57

Target AA: 60% equity funds / 35% bond funds / 5% cash
Target WR: Approx 2.5% Approx 20% SI (secure income, SS only)
Midpack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2014, 04:44 PM   #17
Moderator
MichaelB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Rocky Inlets
Posts: 24,492
Quote:
Originally Posted by Midpack View Post
I'd be more encouraged if not for the personal savings rate trend (different x-axis than earlier attachment) which I searched for as a result of this thread.
I get your point. Still, a higher savings rate means less current consumption, which usually has a deflationary impact, which is generally not a good thing.

To paraphrase St Augustine, Give us thrift, but do not give it to us yet?
__________________
MichaelB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2014, 04:47 PM   #18
Dryer sheet aficionado
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Lexington
Posts: 34
I think the lower end of the housing market is increasingly rentals, which weights actual home sales to the higher end of the spectrum.
__________________
treeofpain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2014, 04:57 PM   #19
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,327
Quote:
Originally Posted by REWahoo View Post
Home sales price to income ratios in our zip code are now about 7 to 1 with multiple offers and an average of 20% down. Is that really a sustainable ratio long term? That is a pretty big percent of income for families buying in the current market to spend just on housing alone.
__________________
daylatedollarshort is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2014, 04:58 PM   #20
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,709
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB View Post
I get your point. Still, a higher savings rate means less current consumption, which usually has a deflationary impact, which is generally not a good thing.

To paraphrase St Augustine, Give us thrift, but do not give it to us yet?
St Augustine: "Better to have fewer wants than greater riches to supply increasing wants."
__________________

__________________
Living well is the best revenge!
Retired @ 52 in 2005
marko is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bureau of Census dwellr smartphone app timo2 Other topics 1 02-25-2014 04:28 PM
2010 Census Data MichaelB Other topics 19 12-22-2010 01:49 PM
Fastest growing metros per US Census Bureau Orchidflower Life after FIRE 2 07-14-2007 04:15 PM
Medical Information Bureau and Health Insurance mykidslovedogs Health and Early Retirement 5 12-20-2006 11:24 AM
U.S. Census Bureau Data On Net Worth Tommy_Dolitte Young Dreamers 48 07-25-2005 06:35 PM

 

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:40 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.