Dex, I think my assumption is (and where we differ) not that people accept these ideas consciously - but because these conversations have not been had enough in a public way - that all of this results in all of us having some sort of ideas that are skewed by the negative ideas - or perpetuated because we're all talking amongst ourselves...
I truly do not understand you principle or philosophical point.
If you could state it as an sociological hypothosis it might be helpful.
For example, take your premise that we are all inundated with stereotypes or prejudices and how does that affect the individual; groups of individuals and the society in which they live.
Ok, I'll give it a try
What I'm saying is that all of us - you - me - everyone - are inundated. So even if we consciously reject these notions - because we "see" them subconsciously as well - that we can't help but perhaps feel uncomfortable in certain situations. This has been proven time and again and even black folks and other minorities harbor these feelings against their own community or others.
So what i'm saying is that if we believe that none of us is immune - it's not about whether one person is biased or not - we are all to an extent - but uncovering them so that we can untangle what we know (both consciously and unconsciously). I think someone linked that stereotype image test here before and most people whatever color show some bias. But it seems that many of the white commentators and white liberals who were previously supporting Obama - are now appalled and ready to point out his every flaw - partly because they feel accused of being biased.
As a group - because many people do not mix with folks outside of their community - let's say race here - often also includes class - that then these ideas or assumptions (which often feel harmless) are often reaffirmed and then perpetuated.
For example, my sister's husband is a white guy, family from midwest, blond, blue eyed. Goes toy shopping with my sister for my daughter - realized that 95% of the baby dolls were blond and blue eyed - he realized he had never ever thought of that before.
So - as most folks acknowledge - there are then stark differences in the ways that one community views the same experience - for example - the 4th of July, which Federick Douglas points out in this famous speech:
Frederick Douglass speech which if he gave now may be considered unpatriotic etc.
Dex, at one point you said Obama's pov of history is distorted - Obama and others may view your pov of history as distorted - who is correct here?
Also - there is obviously considerably more sympathy among many black folks for Wright's sentiments - however wrong - because they know that at least some of what he said was true - even if exaggerated. While some whites and others may find it appalling - it is harder for those in the black community to condem him.
For example - while the AIDS as a tool of the govmt to get rid of blacks idea seems ridiculous - things like the Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male
(which only stopped in 1972 by the way) Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
make people a bit skeptical of government and susceptible to consider other conspiracy theories.
So - back to my original point - If/when people decide to open their hearts and minds to listen to a point of view different from their own - one that seems totally out of whack with what you know and believe - but LISTEN - with the intent of UNDERSTANDING - that there is a ton to be gained for all sides. Some of the extreme views from each side will at least be tempered. You can't judge or discount someone else's experience by comparing it to your own experiences because they are often so different.
There is an Old Testament prophecy of the "sins of the Fathers being visited upon the third and fourth generations" so it's not a new idea - and Obama is saying - let's move forward. But you can't move forward if one group is saying "get over it" and the other is saying "but you don't understand!" -and just like in a relationship - it's not really about who's right or wrong - but about each side feeling "heard"
This is not unlike some of the groups in the middle east or south africa and other contentious places where people from opposing communities decide to get together to learn and listen to each other.
____________