|
|
Opinions/advice regarding HOA conflict
07-19-2016, 04:00 PM
|
#1
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2008
Location: No fixed abode
Posts: 8,765
|
Opinions/advice regarding HOA conflict
We're having an issue with the HOA in our townhouse development. We own the townhouse, but rent it to DD and family. So we're in town for a month or two helping out with the new baby while SiL is deployed, and DW, who is an avid gardener (and retired certified landscape designer) decides to rip out the old nasty looking plants out front and put in some that might actually thrive and look nice. The old ones were typical townhouse plants - Golden Euonymus right under the windows, with white azaleas in front of them.
The euonymous were healthy enough, but they had 5 of them planted in a 15' area, and they had overgrown the space. Plus, they're just not very attractive, as evidenced by this article from Southern Living - Five Awful Plants for the Front of Your House | Southern Living Blog. We actually like azaleas, but the location was just not right for them. Dry clay soil in full sunlight. They had lacebugs and were mostly dead.
We are replacing them with a few Soft Touch Hollies in the back and drift roses up front, and adding a few day lilies. Nice, simple to maintain, and appropriate for the microclimate.
Anyway, the HOA has decided that we can only replace dead plants with the exact same plant. It does say so in the covenants. They also say we needed to get approval before doing anything.
However, it also says earlier in the covenants that
Quote:
There are a number of exceptions to this otherwise inclusive review requirement."... "Minor landscape improvements will also not require an application. This includes foundation plantings, or single specimen plantings. In general landscape improvements of a small scale which do not materially alter the appearance of the Lot, involve a change in topography or ground and which are not of sufficient scale to constitute a natural structure will be exempt from the design review process.
|
Reading that part of the covenants makes it very clear that the review/approval process is for making changes to the lay of the land, the actual building, or things like building a patio, or putting in a tree or low voltage lighting. The exceptions to the review process above makes it clear to me that landscape plants are not part of it.
So basically there are conflicting rules within the covenants, and when reading them you come to the part giving permission first. To me that means we can do it, and they can't stop us. DW is fighting with them trying to get permission. She put in a professionally drawn and designed (by her) plan, for review, and they denied it saying things like "removing healthy and successful plantings" and "replacing them with unattractive and unaesthetic plants". How dwarf hollies and drift roses (which stay fairly small and produce lots of flowers) can be unattractive and unaesthetic they don't explain. Anyway, my thought is to put the plants in and let them try to fine us. If they do we can turn it over to a lawyer and they can explain why they can choose which part of the covenants to enforce and why we should be able to read their mind about it.
I'm curious what y'all think about this. By the way, here are some pictures of the "healthy and successful" plants we replaced.
__________________
"Good judgment comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgement." - Anonymous (not Will Rogers or Sam Clemens)
DW and I - FIREd at 50 (7/06), living off assets
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
07-19-2016, 04:05 PM
|
#2
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Spending the Kids Inheritance and living in Chicago
Posts: 17,087
|
Hey if you want to throw away money go ahead and put in the plants and fight it with a lawyer.
The HOA will fight you with your own money, raising the fees and special assessments as the costs mount to cover their legal bills, and no expense need be spared on their part.
You should instead run for the board, change the rules , and see what its like being a board member with dozens of folks wanting to do their own thing all the time.
|
|
|
07-19-2016, 04:08 PM
|
#3
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Les Bois
Posts: 5,761
|
I wouldn't go there. If they rejected the request, the best option is to capitulate, IMO.
__________________
You can't be a retirement plan actuary without a retirement plan, otherwise you lose all credibility...
|
|
|
07-19-2016, 04:11 PM
|
#4
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,021
|
Sign above the door of the HOA office in our old neighborhood: "Abandon all hope ye who enter here. "
__________________
Numbers is hard
|
|
|
07-19-2016, 04:20 PM
|
#5
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2008
Location: No fixed abode
Posts: 8,765
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big_Hitter
I wouldn't go there. If they rejected the request, the best option is to capitulate, IMO.
|
The problem with that is that the old plants have been removed and disposed of. The new ones are sitting in place (still in their pots) waiting to go in. So we'd end up disposing of a bunch of not cheap plants and buying new ones to match the old ones.
Also, there shouldn't have even been a request based on the covenants. DW just put it in after the fact to be politically correct. IMO that was a mistake.
__________________
"Good judgment comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgement." - Anonymous (not Will Rogers or Sam Clemens)
DW and I - FIREd at 50 (7/06), living off assets
|
|
|
07-19-2016, 04:21 PM
|
#6
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Les Bois
Posts: 5,761
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by harley
The problem with that is that the old plants have been removed and disposed of. The new ones are sitting in place (still in their pots) waiting to go in. So we'd end up disposing of a bunch of not cheap plants and buying new ones to match the old ones.
Also, there shouldn't have even been a request based on the covenants. DW just put it in after the fact to be politically correct. IMO that was a mistake.
|
my bad, I misread the covenant - GO FOR IT and make sure you plant them in good dirt!
those poor azaleas look terrible, definitely not happy
__________________
You can't be a retirement plan actuary without a retirement plan, otherwise you lose all credibility...
|
|
|
07-19-2016, 04:26 PM
|
#7
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,706
|
My experience with HOA boards is they delight in the petty exercise of power over their neighbors and love to engage in battle.
My suggestion would be to grovel a little raise the white flag. Write a nice letter, apologize profusely for acting without their explicit authorization, say you thought you were within the rules based on this " "Minor landscape improvements will also not require an application". Acknowledge their supreme authority and cosmic greatness, and then humbly ask if you can plant some "whatevers", affirming that you shouldn't replace with the previous "whatevers' because there isn't enough space. Look around the neighborhood, see who else has some landscaping similar to what you want. If you see some, point out that your proposal is compatible with the other landscapes, especially xxx and yyy. If no one else has anything different, prepare to throw in the towel.
|
|
|
07-19-2016, 04:31 PM
|
#8
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Spending the Kids Inheritance and living in Chicago
Posts: 17,087
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by harley
The problem with that is that the old plants have been removed and disposed of. The new ones are sitting in place (still in their pots) waiting to go in. So we'd end up disposing of a bunch of not cheap plants and buying new ones to match the old ones.
Also, there shouldn't have even been a request based on the covenants. DW just put it in after the fact to be politically correct. IMO that was a mistake.
|
The plants are cheaper than 3 hours of a lawyer, and that would just be the starting point.
Even though the covenants do seem to be somewhat on your side, that still does not mean the board won't fight you.
Example, the covenant talks of foundation plantings, but the ones you are doing are far from the foundation, what is the distance until its not a foundation planting ? , if planted at the middle of the lawn is that still foundation planting ? , how about at the street curb ?
Too bad the rule didn't say plantings within 5 feet of the foundation cement wall.
|
|
|
07-19-2016, 04:34 PM
|
#9
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,401
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB
My suggestion would be to grovel a little raise the white flag. Write a nice letter, apologize profusely for acting without their explicit authorization, say you thought you were within the rules based on this " "Minor landscape improvements will also not require an application". Acknowledge their supreme authority and cosmic greatness, and then humbly ask if you can plant some "whatevers", affirming that you shouldn't replace with the previous "whatevers' because there isn't enough space. Look around the neighborhood, see who else has some landscaping similar to what you want. If you see some, point out that your proposal is compatible with the other landscapes, especially xxx and yyy. If no one else has anything different, prepare to throw in the towel.
|
This.
Imagine if everyone wanted to do their own thing. Not everyone has your DW's talents. Pretty soon there could be old rusty wheelbarrows and plaster statues. The HOA bylaws are there for a reason.
|
|
|
07-19-2016, 04:36 PM
|
#10
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Flyover country
Posts: 25,346
|
MichaelB's response is spot on IMHO. We moved into a condo last year. It was the third time for me so I knew what to expect. Since DW loves her plants and had lots of ideas for improvement, I allowed them to put me on the HOA board when the first vacancy arose. It worked like a charm. Board members can pretty much do what they like!
|
|
|
07-19-2016, 04:47 PM
|
#11
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2008
Location: No fixed abode
Posts: 8,765
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB
My experience with HOA boards is they delight in the petty exercise of power over their neighbors and love to engage in battle.
My suggestion would be to grovel a little raise the white flag. Write a nice letter, apologize profusely for acting without their explicit authorization, say you thought you were within the rules based on this " "Minor landscape improvements will also not require an application". Acknowledge their supreme authority and cosmic greatness, and then humbly ask if you can plant some "whatevers", affirming that you shouldn't replace with the previous "whatevers' because there isn't enough space. Look around the neighborhood, see who else has some landscaping similar to what you want. If you see some, point out that your proposal is compatible with the other landscapes, especially xxx and yyy. If no one else has anything different, prepare to throw in the towel.
|
We already tried that, with the approval process, which they denied. So no luck there. And yes, we did make sure to pick plants that are used in other parts of the development. No joy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meadbh
This.
Imagine if everyone wanted to do their own thing. Not everyone has your DW's talents. Pretty soon there could be old rusty wheelbarrows and plaster statues. The HOA bylaws are there for a reason.
|
There are specific rules disallowing things like that. And there is a specific rule allowing what we are doing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunset
The plants are cheaper than 3 hours of a lawyer, and that would just be the starting point.
Even though the covenants do seem to be somewhat on your side, that still does not mean the board won't fight you.
Example, the covenant talks of foundation plantings, but the ones you are doing are far from the foundation, what is the distance until its not a foundation planting ? , if planted at the middle of the lawn is that still foundation planting ? , how about at the street curb ?
Too bad the rule didn't say plantings within 5 feet of the foundation cement wall.
|
We are planting in the same bed, right up next to the foundation. There's a very specific definition of foundation plantings
Quote:
a group of plants used in landscape design to blend a building with its setting and obscure any undesirable features of the foundation
|
(from Webster's Dictionary)
__________________
"Good judgment comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgement." - Anonymous (not Will Rogers or Sam Clemens)
DW and I - FIREd at 50 (7/06), living off assets
|
|
|
07-19-2016, 05:01 PM
|
#12
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Santa Paula
Posts: 4,076
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunset
Hey if you want to throw away money go ahead and put in the plants and fight it with a lawyer.
The HOA will fight you with your own money, raising the fees and special assessments as the costs mount to cover their legal bills, and no expense need be spared on their part.
You should instead run for the board, change the rules , and see what its like being a board member with dozens of folks wanting to do their own thing all the time.
|
You are right! I was on the board of my HOA for 25 years (and still retained my sanity). My Dad in FL tried to fight the HOA, and it cost a lot of money, and when my Mom died, it cost $35 K to have the lien removed when they sold the condo!
__________________
Retired Jan 2009 Have not looked back.
AA 60/35/5 considering SS and pensions a SP annuity
WR 2% with 2SS & 2 Pensions
|
|
|
07-19-2016, 05:01 PM
|
#13
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Huntsville, AL/Helen, GA
Posts: 6,002
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meadbh
Imagine if everyone wanted to do their own thing. Not everyone has your DW's talents. Pretty soon there could be old rusty wheelbarrows and plaster statues. The HOA bylaws are there for a reason.
|
Not all bylaws of Homeowners Associations are written in such narrow terms. Specialized attorneys write such documents, and they're not all created equal.
And don't take up for a bunch of power hungry HOA board members that cause their members trouble--even if unintentionally. HOA's will constantly remind you that they're there to keep up your property values. That's not always the outcome.
At our last HOA, any change of trim paint had to be approved, and their list of approved colors was short. Until they let the guy across the street from me paint his trim bright purple. HOA's can often be so inconsistent.
We had 400 homes in the neighborhood, and relatively few played tennis on the 4 first class lighted courts. Re-doing the tennis courts for so few people every 4 years just about bankrupted the HOA.
No thank you to any more HOA's.
|
|
|
07-19-2016, 05:30 PM
|
#14
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Desert SW
Posts: 358
|
I spent 10 years in our last neighborhood HOA. It's a thankless, ugly volunteer job and when I quit, not a single person in the community would take my place. Some owners just do there own thing, never thinking to seek approval (after they sign all of the covenant docs), then they get the dreaded letter, and come to meetings and scream. If the HOA lets them do whatever it was they did, then everybody gets to do whatever they want and the HOA board gets sued.
Best doing (undoing) whatever the docs say and be done with it. We had to lien several properties during my tenure and it's not pretty for anyone.
__________________
Retired in 2011 at 54
|
|
|
07-19-2016, 05:41 PM
|
#15
|
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 13,913
|
Since they already denied your initial appeal, I'd find a local school or women's shelter or church and donate the waiting-to-be-planted new plants, and go to home depot, pick up a few replacement azaleas and Euonymus and be done with it.
|
|
|
07-19-2016, 05:48 PM
|
#16
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 950
|
I would state, in writing, that if a violation occurred it was unintentional, and that the previous plantings have been discarded. How does the HOA want me to proceed? I would be more than willing to accept their guidance and move on. If lucky....they'll just agree to the planting of what you already purchased.
Some fights just aren't worth my time....and this would be one.
__________________
"Some people describe themselves as being able to see things as a glass half full. For some, the glass is half empty. Me? I can't even find the f***king glass."
Silver
|
|
|
07-19-2016, 06:01 PM
|
#17
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 21,298
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silver
I would state, in writing, that if a violation occurred it was unintentional, and that the previous plantings have been discarded. How does the HOA want me to proceed? I would be more than willing to accept their guidance and move on. If lucky....they'll just agree to the planting of what you already purchased.
Some fights just aren't worth my time....and this would be one.
|
+1. What MichaelB suggested should have worked. Since it didn't, I appears you've insulted the exalted HOA, so you will not win. The approach above puts the ball back in their court, preventing further a dispute. Not worth the trouble. "No good deed goes unpunished..."
__________________
No one agrees with other people's opinions; they merely agree with their own opinions -- expressed by somebody else. Sydney Tremayne
Retired Jun 2011 at age 57
Target AA: 50% equity funds / 45% bonds / 5% cash
Target WR: Approx 1.5% Approx 20% SI (secure income, SS only)
|
|
|
07-19-2016, 06:05 PM
|
#18
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Ex-Cali
Posts: 1,245
|
Sell and move. Bad HOAs just ruin things.
__________________
______________________
The plan was September 1, 2022 and I am 95% there. Still working a few hours a week at the real job.
|
|
|
Opinions/advice regarding HOA conflict
07-19-2016, 06:24 PM
|
#19
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 16,593
|
Opinions/advice regarding HOA conflict
The HOA's position is most likely this - they don't want everyone in the development ripping out plants and replacing them with their own. If you do this, others may follow, creating a hodgepodge of plantings.
The language of the covenants is subjective. If you lawyer up, the HOA board will hold fast, probably assess fines, and possibly lien your property. I would take MichaelB and Silver's advice and try to work with them.
I'm on the review committee in our HOA and we run into this a lot. The problems are only resolved when both parties agree to work together to create the best solution.
Sent from my iPad using Early Retirement Forum
|
|
|
07-19-2016, 06:55 PM
|
#20
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,657
|
Quote:
The HOA bylaws are there for a reason.
|
This has not been my experience. Some HOA bylaws are sensible, but many are just for aggrandizement of the enforcers. Not to mention the selective enforcement which is all too common.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|