Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-22-2019, 08:22 PM   #21
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
travelover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,328
I've found jury duty to be both educational and eye opening. I served on a jury hearing a case of a young black man accused of first degree murder. His bumbling court appointed attorney obviously was not prepared as he appeared to be reading up on the details of the case as he walked into the courtroom. His defense was laughable as he really didn't even seem to understand what had happened. I never realized that the standards of representation could be so low for such a serious case.

In another case that I served on, I was astounded at how gullible the others jurors were for a case of a guy accused of falsely returning lawnmowers for a refund. The guy had returned something like 20 mowers in one month to Kmart stores and the other jurors thought that might be credible.
travelover is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 10-22-2019, 08:24 PM   #22
Recycles dryer sheets
SunBlueSky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by wompo View Post
When I’ve been to jury duty it always seems as though at least half the pool has no chance of being on the jury due to the lawyers questioning. I’m not sure why these questions could not be asked online beforehand so at least the members of the jury pool had a chance of being on the jury. I hate going there and one of the lawyers questions excluded me.
On one jury summons, the phone call we made the night before had an automated question about whether you had a particular auto insurer (press 1 for State Farm, etc). I can't remember my answer, nor whether it gave me a reprieve...
SunBlueSky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2019, 08:28 PM   #23
Administrator
Gumby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 22,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lakewood90712 View Post
90% of voir dire is the atty. seeing how you answer the questions , not so much the actual question. they are playing " 3 minute psychologist" .
You would be surprised by what can come out. I once had a jury trial where I represented a commercial lender. The borrower was a local rental car company. The loan was secured by a lien on the vehicles. When the borrower fell behind on payments, the lender called the loan and repossessed all the rental cars. The borrower sued because the repossession put them out of business.

When we got to one potential juror, the written questionnaire made him appear almost perfect for our side, as he was a loan officer at a local bank. I felt that he would certainly understand how loans work more than a typical juror and would know that's just the way business works - if you can't pay, your loan gets called and the bank takes its security. In fact, I was concerned that the plaintiff would strike him.

I started by asking him how he liked his work at the bank. He said, "I liked it better before the recent merger [with a big national bank]". Hmmm. So I asked him why. He said "well, when it was just us here locally, I had flexibility to work out problem loans with the borrowers, but now, MegaBank takes a firm party line with delinquent loans and I can't do anything." Shazzam! I ended up using a peremptory challenge on him.
__________________
Living an analog life in the Digital Age.
Gumby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2019, 08:38 PM   #24
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Coronado
Posts: 3,671
Having served on 6 juries -- 3 criminal, 3 civil -- I do have some thoughts (well, a lot of thoughts) about this whole process.

First is that yes, I'd like for jury members to be paid a fair wage for their service. I want people who are there to do a job and are willing and able to pay attention and make a good decision no matter how long it takes. Right now, a really large percentage of jurors are driven by a desire to minimize the negative financial impacts they're suffering as a result of being on a jury and this absolutely affects verdicts. This is not good for anyone who is relying on an impartial and fair jury of their peers. As it stands today, if I were involved in a legal proceeding, I am certain that I would prefer a bench trial to a jury trial.

I also think there should be a limit on how many juries or how many total days a person has to serve. I've spent about 55 days actually sitting on juries and another 3 or 4 when I've been summoned but not empaneled. And yet, whenever I sit through voir dire, there are at least a dozen other people, many older than me, who say they've never been on a jury before. I've done way more than my fair share of this particular civic duty. We need to make a much better effort to spread the onus equally across the population.

It's been 3 yrs since my last jury service ended, so I've been expecting to get another summons any day. One thing that I am thankful for is that at least I can choose which courthouse to serve at and change the starting date if I need to.
cathy63 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2019, 08:43 PM   #25
Moderator
rodi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 14,169
Having been prosecuted (and acquitted, with an order of factual innocence put in) I am a HUGE fan of the jury system. But I've only served on one jury. I get cut when they find out I was prosecuted... and acquitted. The prosecuting attorney is the one doing the cutting... I guess they figure I'd be leaning towards the defendants position.

FWIW the one day one trial thing is not always true... If they don't finish voi dire the call you back for a second day.... If it's a big trial, with lots of jurors cut, it can lead to a third day. And here in San Diego they can call you back in 1 year of you're not selected.... so I had 3 days before I was cut, and was called back the next year since I didn't serve on a trial. I get called every year. Just never selected.
__________________
Retired June 2014. No longer an enginerd - now I'm just a nerd.
micro pensions 6%, rental income 20%
rodi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2019, 09:06 PM   #26
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Coronado
Posts: 3,671
Quote:
Originally Posted by travelover View Post
In another case that I served on, I was astounded at how gullible the others jurors were for a case of a guy accused of falsely returning lawnmowers for a refund. The guy had returned something like 20 mowers in one month to Kmart stores and the other jurors thought that might be credible.
I've been amazed at different perspectives and knowledge gaps sometimes too. On the last jury I was on, a key piece of evidence was a check written by the plaintiff that had been cashed by the defendant. We looked at this check pretty much every day during 4 weeks of testimony as most of the witnesses were asked about it. Then when we got to deliberations, one jury member (the youngest, about age 22) started off with "we all know that check is a forgery right? Because if the plaintiff had actually given it to the defendant he couldn't have had it in his files."

It would never have occurred to me that younger people would not know that you can get your checks back after processing if you want to, and that all accounts were that way at one time; but once he said it I could definitely understand how he came to that conclusion. Of course, once we older jury members explained why the plaintiff had the canceled check, we found out that the young man been so distracted by his "forgery" idea that he'd missed at least half the testimony.
cathy63 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2019, 09:37 PM   #27
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Senator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Williston, FL
Posts: 3,925
I have been on a jury.

If you do not want to serve, just denounce your citizenship.
__________________
FIRE no later than 7/5/2016 at 56 (done), securing '16 401K match (done), getting '15 401K match (done), LTI Bonus (done), Perf bonus (done), maxing out 401K (done), picking up 1,000 hours to get another year of pension (done), July 1st benefits (vacation day, healthcare) (done), July 4th holiday. 0 days left. (done) OFFICIALLY RETIRED 7/5/2016!!
Senator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2019, 10:14 PM   #28
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
samclem's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 14,404
I recently served on a jury for a shoplifting case, and I've had to report several times and was not selected. Jury duty is just part of the price of citizenship--I doubt anyone looks forward to it. My gripe is that there seemed to be too many folks inconvenienced--only about one third of the folks who reported that day were even subjected to voi dire. Maybe it's tough to know how many people will need to be interviewed before filling the jury, but it always appears to be a big waste of a lot of people's time.
samclem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2019, 10:19 PM   #29
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 6,681
I have been called for jury duty 3 times going back to 1987, the first year I was called. The process and treatment of jurors has varied over the years, and I have found some improvements from 1987 to 1996, the second time I served, and some roe improvements to 2007, the third time I was called.


That first time, in 1987, I ended up getting on the jury of a shoplifting case. The Central Jury area was an auditorium with uncomfortable fold-down chairs we sat in while we waited for our names to be called. It took most of the day before I was called for a criminal case in the other courthouse.


The case itself began that day and continued into the next day. The 6-person jury I was on was all older men (I was 24 at the time). I would later find out why. The next day was a holiday so the courts were closed and I returned to work. The next day, we get to the courtroom and were told the trial could not continue that day (Thursday) so the next day and we were to report back on Monday. We got credit for a day served so we didn't have to go back to work.


I went back to work Friday, much to the confusion of my coworkers who couldn't
figure out why I kept showing up at work while I had gotten on a case. On Monday, the case wrapped up and we went to verdict, convicting the 39-year-old housewife and mother. That day, we were treated to lunch even though we hadn't yet begun deliberating because the judge felt bad about how we had been jerked around.


I spoke to the prosecutor after our guilty verdict, as he wanted to know what he could have done better. He also told me why all the women were dismissed from being on the jury (was this legal in New York in 1987?). None of the older men were frequent shoppers, and the case hinged on the suspect's handling of a shopping cart which held the shoplifted goods. I was a frequent shopper, so I knew her story was BS, and I convinced the other jurors it was, too. The prosecutor was a young man, too, and said little about this key element of the case.


I was actually fascinated by the whole process. I received full salary for the 4 days served. The commute to the county courthouse was a lot shorter (15-20 minutes) and easier than my commute from LI to Manhattan on the trains (60-75 minutes). And, once I got on the case, I didn't have to arrive at the courthouse until 10 or 11 AM, I forget which, so I could sleep in. There was also a good place to eat lunch nearby, so I ate well.


The next time I served, in 1996, I got called for a case my first day. Jury selection was ongoing and I was among the bunch still being questioned when we adjourned for the day. But when we arrived the next day, the prosecutor and defense lawyer were working out a plea deal so we got sent back to central jury. We were in a different building than in 1987, and this central jury area was much more pleasant. We had comfortable tables and chairs, like a lounge. There was a TV area and we could borrow board games from the Central Jury leader. We played joke on one Monopoly payer when she had to use the rest room. I filled in and as a gag we pretended to mortgage all her properties and hid her cash. She was dumbfounded when she returned. We got her good!


At the end of the second day, the leader gave us a choice. If we wanted to leave early, we had to return the next day. If we stayed later into the afternoon, we could be done if we didn't get on a case. This split up all of us pretty equally, with me in the first group because I had some stuff to do that evening. I was getting full pay anyway. I returned the next day and wasn't called for a case, so I was done. I did get a minor digestive mishap from an area pizza joint, though.


The third time was in 2007. By then, New York had vastly changed its jury system in that many of the automatic exemptions had been repealed, expanding the jury pool and lessening the length of time someone had to serve. After calling in two nights earlier and seeing my number wasn't within the range of those who had to report, my number was up for the second day. I reported to the same building as the one in 1987 and they had greatly improved the central jury room to like what was in the other building. I was quickly called with about 30 other people for questioning for a civil case. Unlike criminal cases, the lawyers run the show, no judges here. They were a pair of yakkety lawyers who took all day to find 6 jurors and one alternate. By the end of the day, I was one of maybe 5 people whose names hadn't been asked any specific questions, as everyone ese was either on the jury or dismissed and sent back to Central Jury. The ~5 of us were given a receipt and told not to return the next day. We were done, yay!


I was working part-time at the time, so I got full pay for the one day and wasn't scheduled to work the day before. Unfortunately, that good lunch place from 1987 wasn't around any more, so lunch sucked!


I haven't been called back since 2007. But I wouldn't mind it this time because I am retired. I could volunteer if I wanted to, so I've heard. But I'm not that eager to do this again.
__________________
Retired in late 2008 at age 45. Cashed in company stock, bought a lot of shares in a big bond fund and am living nicely off its dividends. IRA, SS, and a pension await me at age 60 and later. No kids, no debts.

"I want my money working for me instead of me working for my money!"
scrabbler1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2019, 10:52 PM   #30
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Sunset's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Spending the Kids Inheritance and living in Chicago
Posts: 17,008
Quote:
Originally Posted by badatmath View Post
It would help if they sent you to the court closest to your house instead of the one that is 2 hours each way.
This is my big beef with Cook County jury duty, as OP has pointed out.
It is a H_LL of a drive down to California Ave. where the Jail and Courthouse are located.
By the way that area is so rough, you pray you don't get a flat tire, because you will be dead meat if you do.
It's where houses are demolished and if standing, most are boarded up.
Groups (gangs) of young men hang around watching you drive by...
The parking garage is guarded and has a fence around it and you can ask for an armed guard escort to your car.

There is a court within the suburbs but we don't get called for that one. I think it's a plot to get jury members who are NOT the peers of the accused.
__________________
Fortune favors the prepared mind. ... Louis Pasteur
Sunset is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2019, 11:01 PM   #31
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
skipro33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Placerville
Posts: 1,788
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobbieB View Post
If you think jury duty is bad...

We used to have the draft. Yes, you've been selected to go to some place bad that you never wanted to go and carry a rifle and shoot at people you don't want to kill and then you get shot full of holes and die.

Makes Jury Duty look kinda tame eh?

Yea, I was going to point out the same thing; nothing like getting drafted at 18, terrorized for 8 weeks of boot camp, another few months of combat training and then off to some place half way around the world where everyone you are with has the stink of fear on their breath.

Jury duty I always thought of as a break from work. Sorta like a mini vacation.
skipro33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2019, 11:10 PM   #32
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Teacher Terry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 7,001
Skip, yes glad I was a woman during this time.
Teacher Terry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2019, 11:51 PM   #33
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Lakewood90712's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,223
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunset View Post
There is a court within the suburbs but we don't get called for that one. I think it's a plot to get jury members who are NOT the peers of the accused.
Actually some truth to that. Both sides do NOT want prospective jurors that are likely to be personally familiar with the places or people in the trial. This goes for civil or criminal.

The attys. and the court insist jurors to use only the evidence presented
. Being familiar with the crime scene, accident scene , etc can alter that. Especially when a juror knows something in the evidence presented is inaccurate.

The jury is the blind lady weighing what each side presents. Imperfect ? you bet. Better system ? none I know of.
__________________
" A person is smart, but People are dumb, dangerous, panicky animals, and you know it " Agent "K", Men in Black
Lakewood90712 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2019, 02:11 AM   #34
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by 38Chevy454 View Post
I agree with all of your points, but the last one just won't happen. Certain lawyers want the uninformed and easily convinced person on a jury. Many times they do not want educated or higher understanding jurors.
I despise whenever I was given notice, most times being a long way from home and sure as F*** I would not have been a jury of the defendant's peers! Only good thing was that I did get paid by work, but i was still the poor stooge that had to ruin my day(s) going down to the courthouse waiting to see if i was selected. Complete waste of my time every single time.
Two times summoned, two times seated on a trial jury. I must be dumb.
SonofCohoes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2019, 04:52 AM   #35
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,405
I did two ten year employment stints with government agencies. They paid your salary when you were on jury duty, so most potential jurors that were employees of these agencies were fine with being called. However, once the jury folks found this out, you got on the list to be called every year. For years, even after I left the jobs, the notice would arrive every February, without fail. I hear from them every three to four years now.

I twice had employees that got called and seated for capital murder cases when I worked for the government. One was gone six weeks, the other four. We (or rather the taxpayers) paid their full salaries while they served on the juries.

In the private sector, I had one employer that said anyone that could not get out of jury duty was stupid. As a result, no one went.

One good thing about turning 70 is that you can request a permanent exemption. My father failed to do that and was still getting notices at 80, with advancing Alzheimer's disease. Took a while to fix that after I found out. Ummm, no, he can't sign the exemption request...
Another Reader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2019, 07:01 AM   #36
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
donheff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 11,317
I dislike jury duty, primarily because waiting around to be called on a panel is so boring. I also wish they would pay a reasonable fee. Still, it is a reasonable duty of citizenship. Professional jurors? No thanks.
__________________
Idleness is fatal only to the mediocre -- Albert Camus
donheff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2019, 07:11 AM   #37
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
zinger1457's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,222
It's strange the way jury duty selection works, I lived in California for a number of years and got called up at least once every year, sometimes twice in a year. Been living in Arizona for the last 24 years and got called up once during that period and never even had to show up, just called in to check and was told not to come in. Maybe the benefit of living in a rural area, not enough big crimes.
zinger1457 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2019, 07:13 AM   #38
Administrator
MichaelB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,583
I spent much of my adult life living abroad where justice was determined by judges, not juries. If I’m ever arrested and tried I’ll take a jury every time.

I’ve served a total of close to 3 months on jury duty and will serve again without complaint if called.
MichaelB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2019, 07:17 AM   #39
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 5,800
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gumby View Post
One thing that I notice these days is that people talk a lot about their rights, but not about their concomitant obligations or duties. Should you be charged with a crime, you have a right to a jury of your peers. To make that right a reality, someone else has a duty to be a juror. And, in turn, to afford someone else their right to a jury trial, you have a duty to obey the summons to jury duty when you are called.
+1 Thank you

I have been called to jury duty at least 5 times, most recently filled out the form for US District court, I may be "randomly selected" anytime from 12-19 to 12-21--two years!
I have only been chosen to actually serve on a jury once. It was interesting.
__________________
Give a Man a fish, he will eat for a day.
Teach a Man to fish, he will eat for a lifetime.
pacergal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2019, 08:21 AM   #40
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Chicago West Burbs
Posts: 2,998
I have been seated on 3 juries. Only one, a right of eminent domain case, went thru to the end. All that we could do was to decide a fair compensation amount. One, a doctor malpractice suit was declared a mistrial by the judge during the opening statements due to one prejudicial attorney's remarks. The other was a drug dealer who changed his plea to guilty after seeing the makeup of the jury.

It is an interesting look into real court proceedings, which are not like what I see on TV. I have not been called in the last 14 years since I moved to different county.
CRLLS is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How To Get Out Of Jury Duty poboy Other topics 29 07-17-2008 07:04 PM
Jury Duty Strategy TromboneAl Other topics 60 06-18-2008 01:08 PM
1 hour jury duty tangomonster Other topics 13 07-31-2007 01:45 PM
Jury Duty Cool Dood Other topics 54 10-27-2006 05:42 AM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:12 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.