My son has been accepted to several universities, both private and public. Going through the list, he and I have no problems comparing one school from another based on cost, academic level, and enviroment.
We are stuck, though, when trying to weight UCLA versus UT or A&M. We are in Texas, so we pay resident tuition and fee for UT and A&M, about $8,500 annually. As a non-resident we'll have to pay $25,000 tuition and fee for UCLA, or roughly 3 times as much.
We have not received the final financial packages from any of the 3 schools. Let's discuss based on the assumption that there won't be any help (which is likely the case, since they all are public schools).
The question my son and I are wrestling with is: Is UCLA worth the extra $16,500 a year? My son knows that if he chooses UCLA, he will have to take a loan to help out, as the cost exceeds my allocated fund.
Edit to add: My son have not yet heard from UC Berkeley, should he get accepted there, he and I will go through this exercise again. So, please comment on Berkeley versus UT or A&M as well. Thanks.
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
I agree that the the field of study would play at least a small part in the choice. My son went through a similar situation. We decided against out of state schools because of cost and the fact that none were better than what UT or A&M had to offer. The AE department at both were good, but A&M had the edge in that field. He toured both campuses and after the visit to A&M that pretty much sealed the deal. He fell in love with the tradition of A&M. My son in law also went there with an EE degree.
I have friends who went to both schools. I think that you need to take into account things like the setting Austin versus College Station and environments. UT seems a little more liberal than Texas A&M, at least 20 years ago.
__________________
Angels danced on the day that you were born.
Another consideration may be where he wants to live after graduation. All of the above mentioned are excellent schools with good reputations nationally. If he does have a strong preference for where he'd like to live (TX? Southwest? CA?) he may want to check with the placement department to see how strong the regional recruiting networks are at each school.
I think I remember someplace reading last year that A&M has the most conservative student body. Bush's Presidential Library is also located on A&M's campus.
Right, would your son be a "2 percenter" at A&M or would he really enjoy the culture? A&M is a conservative school. The corps (ROTC) is a big part of campus life.
UT is obviously more urban, as is UCLA (which is perhaps too urban?).
Berkeley is the better school for EE. Is a top 5 school compared to a top 10 school worth an extra $16k+/yr? Probably not so much on the undergrad level.
If he is interested in a co-op (internship), you may also want to take into account how many opportunities there are in the nearby community. Austin is full of tech companies that hire co-ops from UT.
I went through the EE program in a town that didn't have many local opportunities, and many of my classmates moved 1000+ miles between work and school (6 months of each in our case) for their co-op assignments. However, they got some great work experience and the top job offers as a result.
I'd strongly encourage him to do a co-op no matter where he goes.
Sam, I see you're from Houston. Have you and your son considered Rice? Great school and probably lots of nearby co-op possibilities. You may even save some expenses on dorm fees if he were to live at home while attending school. Just throwing out ideas. An extra $16,500 per year for a California school just seems a bit much to me.
Since you are from Texas... you must NOT be native... UT vs A&M
Each school has a major following... and the people who like one usually don't like the other... both are good in what they do.. but from what I hear, A&M is a bit more hands on thier students...
Now, I have a nephew and niece at UT and both love it..
As for the extra money... think $66K more!!! And maybe even more than that if he does not graduate in 4 years... it is not worth it to go out of state when you compare it with any public Texas school...
Austin is full of tech companies that hire co-ops from UT.
Good point, thanks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poundkey
Sam, I see you're from Houston. Have you and your son considered Rice? Great school and probably lots of nearby co-op possibilities. You may even save some expenses on dorm fees if he were to live at home while attending school. Just throwing out ideas. An extra $16,500 per year for a California school just seems a bit much to me.
I encourage both my kids to apply to Rice. I know they have a good chance of getting accepted there. But they did not. In fact, they refused to apply to any schools in Houston. Reason? They want to get far away from the restrictive parents Not that I blame them. I would get away myself.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Proud
Since you are from Texas... you must NOT be native... UT vs A&M
Definitely not native. I was born on the other side of the world.
if they are similar academically, i wouldn't be able to justify the cost difference.
i went to ucla, it was fun but definitely a huge public university - easy to get lost...not worth the price difference to me. i would consider it for my kid if it was between a smaller private school (more one on one attention i didn't get at ucla) and a large public school
also - the demographics will be very different at ucla vs. texas... :P
__________________ If i think of something clever to say, i'll put it here...
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,438
Q: Why do Aggie women wear long dresses?
A: To hide the No-Pest Strip...
__________________ Have Funds, Will Retire "...but do feel free to assert your duly noted opinion on this subject again without benefit of reference or provision of additional information..."
For under-grad I would say stay home and save the money. They are all good schools.
That's a good point. For the money, he'd be better off getting the BSEE from a local school and then spending 1-2 years getting an MSEE from a more prestigious university (or more for a PhD). Prospective employers will pay more attention to the university associated with the graduate degree.
As a grad school student he may have an easier time getting financial aid in the form of a teaching assistant or research assistant position. I believe it's also common for state schools to reduce the tuition for out-of-state students to the in-state price for those who have a TA or RA position.
If he is likely to stop with a BSEE, I'd say he should go to the school with the best co-op program. His co-op experience will play a huge role in what job offer(s) he gets after graduation.
I encourage both my kids to apply to Rice. I know they have a good chance of getting accepted there. But they did not. In fact, they refused to apply to any schools in Houston. Reason? They want to get far away from the restrictive parents Not that I blame them. I would get away myself.
You should have told them that if they applied and got in that you would move far way to get away from them.