|
|
05-05-2011, 02:08 PM
|
#61
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,083
|
Interesting, we did geothermal at our house. Zero maintenance so far.
However, ours is a closed system. I know a lot of the early ones did not use closed loop systems. Perhaps that is the difference?
I do agree that being first on the block does require a lot of careful planning.
__________________
"We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children.
(Ancient Indian Proverb)"
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
05-05-2011, 02:13 PM
|
#62
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 7,113
|
There is an office building in Portland (constructed in the 60s) that heats using a closed loop system. I don't know its condition today but it got rave reviews for many years.
__________________
Duck bjorn.
|
|
|
05-05-2011, 02:24 PM
|
#63
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,603
|
The last maintenance visit the rep suggested I go closed loop. Another 5k down the wishing well (drilling a new well)... we'll see. He did say closed loop in the area have better maintenance records.
__________________
FIRE'd since 2005
|
|
|
05-05-2011, 03:09 PM
|
#64
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 7,113
|
What you are installing is basically a water-to-water heat pump. In our climate the ground temperature is always moderate and water essentially free of salts & minerals so they are efficient year round.
__________________
Duck bjorn.
|
|
|
05-10-2011, 07:43 PM
|
#65
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 177
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nords
The U.S. finished building out a hard-wired telecom infrastructure before cell phones took off. Third-world countries had the luxury of skipping right over the hard-wiring phase and going straight to cell phones. That seems to be working well.
However the same hasn't happened for third-world electrical infrastructure, unless you count the number of "rich" homeowners with backyard fossil-fuel generators. It'll be interesting to see if photovoltaic tech does for electrical power what cell phones have done for telecom, but it may take another 20 years.
|
Last week after reading this I ran into an old friend, one of whose kids was about to go on a work/study/mission trip to somewhere in Africa to install photovoltaic systems on a rural hospital or clinic. They will provide power for incubators as well as lights and power for surgery (which apparently still is done under candlelight at times there). I thought it an interesting coincidence in light of this discussion. This case was largely charitable - participants raised money for the system prior and are providing the labor to install. But it's easy to imagine lots of similar opportunities where the lack of pre-existing competitive infrastructure makes the economics markedly different than in more developed markets. It *will* be interesting to see how that plays out - for renewables in general - in places without the benefit of (or perhaps unconstrained by) existing infrastructure investments.
|
|
|
The production of solar pannels has just been taken to a new level:
06-29-2011, 10:22 PM
|
#66
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 7,113
|
The production of solar pannels has just been taken to a new level:
According to an article in ScienceDaily (June 28, 2011):
Engineers at Oregon State University have discovered a way for the first time to create successful "CIGS" solar devices with inkjet printing, in work that reduces raw material waste by 90 percent and will significantly lower the cost of producing solar energy cells with some very promising compounds.
The above is an excerpt from: Inkjet printing could change the face of solar energy industry Engineers salivate!!!
Now if we could develop cost effective batteries that store the energy produced through the night..
I remember when my Father said that nuclear generators would be so cost effective that it wouldn't pay to meter electricity. I hope that the expectations for solar don't go to that extreme.
__________________
Duck bjorn.
|
|
|
06-29-2011, 10:45 PM
|
#67
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 26,899
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brat
According to an article in ScienceDaily (June 28, 2011):
|
If I had a nickel for every 'breakthrough' I've read about for solar power, I would have retired 10 years earlier...
I recently came across a 'breakthrough' in solar PV - 'beads' of silicon produced from waste from IC manufacturing, and cheaply connected to a thin, flexible plastic plated substrate- it lowered the cost tremendously and the beads captured sunlight at multiple angles. Sounded great! Googling further, I realized that the article was about 10 years old, and no follow up since.
I'll read this one later, but it's probably another 'just around the corner' disappointments.
-ERD50
|
|
|
06-30-2011, 01:07 PM
|
#68
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 26,899
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brat
According to an article in ScienceDaily (June 28, 2011):
Engineers at Oregon State University have discovered a way for the first time to create successful "CIGS" solar devices with inkjet printing, in work that reduces raw material waste by 90 percent and will significantly lower the cost of producing solar energy cells with some very promising compounds.
The above is an excerpt from: Inkjet printing could change the face of solar energy industry Engineers salivate!!!
|
OK, so I got around to reading it. Strikes me as odd that they go on about how cost effective this will be (" reduces raw material waste by 90 percent and will significantly lower the cost of producing solar energy cells"), and then say...
Quote:
The OSU researchers say that with continued research they should be able to achieve an efficiency of about 12 percent, which would make a commercially viable solar cell.
|
They are currently getting 5%. With such low costs, why do they need 12% to be 'commercially viable' (14% is about typical for solar panels today)?
Quote:
Now if we could develop cost effective batteries that store the energy produced through the night..
|
And when you add that to the cost of renewables....
-ERD50
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|