|
03-08-2012, 09:01 PM
|
#1
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 153
|
Windows XP Pro
We are still running Windows XP Pro both on desktop and laptop with MS Office 2003. When are we making a mistake not upgrading to MS 7 and MS Office 2010? I have used MS 7 and sure...some nice functions but does it really matter for what we do at home....doesn't seem like it? I believe XP Pro is not supported but how and what does this mean to a home user not on a network? I've even considered a laptop upgrade to an off lease Dell still running XP Pro? Any input is much appreciated! Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
03-09-2012, 05:55 AM
|
#2
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 225
|
I'm also using XP at home on a laptop bought about 12 years ago. It runs perfectly fine. You really don't miss anything crucial from MS 7 because I have access to it at work. IMO, for a regular home computer user, a simpler OS is always a better, faster and more robust choice. Try to mount a network drive in MS 7 and copy some files over, to see how many more new white hairs you have while waiting.
|
|
|
03-09-2012, 06:06 AM
|
#3
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,003
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratto
I'm also using XP at home on a laptop bought about 12 years ago. It runs perfectly fine. You really don't miss anything crucial from MS 7...
|
+1, except the 12 years ago is five in my case.
Also, I would never spend money on any Microsoft Office software when Openoffice.org and LibreOffice.org are available for free.
__________________
Numbers is hard
|
|
|
03-09-2012, 10:42 AM
|
#4
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 153
|
Just curious...does Open Office work ok with MS 7? Also if you want an e-mail client to replace Outlook is Thunderbird a good choice and what calendar add on might be best? Thanks again for input!
|
|
|
03-09-2012, 11:59 AM
|
#5
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2006
Location: west coast, hi there!
Posts: 8,808
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MovingtotheCove
We are still running Windows XP Pro both on desktop and laptop with MS Office 2003. When are we making a mistake not upgrading to MS 7 and MS Office 2010? I have used MS 7 and sure...some nice functions but does it really matter for what we do at home....doesn't seem like it? I believe XP Pro is not supported but how and what does this mean to a home user not on a network? I've even considered a laptop upgrade to an off lease Dell still running XP Pro? Any input is much appreciated! Thanks.
|
I don't know about security on XP. Is it safe for financial transactions? Personally I would not take the chance unless I knew it was secure. When I moved from XP to Windows 8, I really liked the new look and features. MS Office 2007 was better then MS Office 2003.
|
|
|
03-09-2012, 01:44 PM
|
#7
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SF East Bay
Posts: 4,323
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by easysurfer
|
+!
The only other things that have caused me to upgrade OS in the past have been the need for a feature that my existing OS doesn't offer (I needed to create a virtual private network a few years ago, so had to upgrade from W2000 to XP Pro) or a piece of software that will no longer operate under a particular OS.
I have a feeling I'll be saying goodbye to XP Pro in 2014.
__________________
Contentedly ER, with 3 furry friends (now, sadly, 1).
Planning my escape to the wide open spaces in my campervan (with my remaining kitty, of course!)
On a mission to become the world's second most boring man.
|
|
|
03-09-2012, 02:09 PM
|
#8
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,003
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MovingtotheCove
Just curious...does Open Office work ok with MS 7?
|
Yes.
__________________
Numbers is hard
|
|
|
03-09-2012, 06:30 PM
|
#9
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,880
|
Re a calendar app, Google calendar works great for me.
__________________
Al
|
|
|
03-09-2012, 07:38 PM
|
#10
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Oahu
Posts: 26,856
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MovingtotheCove
Just curious...does Open Office work ok with MS 7? Also if you want an e-mail client to replace Outlook is Thunderbird a good choice and what calendar add on might be best? Thanks again for input!
|
1. Flawlessly. Although I'd recommend using LibreOffice instead, since OpenOffice is quietly being starved to death by Oracle and most of the programmers have moved on to LO.
2. Thunderbird is great. I have 15 years of e-mail from several different providers all backed up to T-Bird. I use e-mail online but run T-Bird every month or so to synch a backup.
3. Google Calendar seems to be the best of the calendar bunch, although there's an active developer's forum working on calendar enhancements to Thunderbird.
__________________
*
Co-author (with my daughter) of “Raising Your Money-Savvy Family For Next Generation Financial Independence.”
Author of the book written on E-R.org: "The Military Guide to Financial Independence and Retirement."
I don't spend much time here— please send a PM.
|
|
|
03-10-2012, 02:56 AM
|
#11
|
Dryer sheet wannabe
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 20
|
I'd recommend not upgrading your OS unless you're upgrading your hardware too. If the hardware is meeting your needs, then don't waste your money.
Most people I've helped make the move from XP to Win 7 has involved the move from 32bit to 64bit. Although XP has a 64bit version it wasn't widely adopted. That allows for virtually unlimited RAM rather than the 3.6ish GB you're capped at. If you're only using office and a web browser, you're not likely going to need it. It also provides better support for SSD drives and the like. One thing to keep in mind is paripherials like printers. If you move to 64 bit, a lot of manufacturers did not release 64 bit drivers meaning you could have to replace an older printer as well. I also think W7 is much more user friendly. It does things proactively like defragging your hard drive. Much better driver support, etc.
If you're also the kind of person who gets angry when the next version comes out - W8 isn't far off. W7 is tried and true to me and I can't predict if W8 is going to be solid or another W ME/Vista.
|
|
|
03-10-2012, 04:35 AM
|
#12
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Eastern WV Panhandle
Posts: 25,299
|
I've (almost) always taken the position that it's best to stay with OS you have until it won't do what you want it to or it won't run software that you want it to.
Of course, this is a guy who was running Win98 until about two years ago. And the computer running that came with Win3.1 installed. So I'll probably be using Win7 until I'm 80.
__________________
When I was a kid I wanted to be older. This is not what I expected.
|
|
|
03-10-2012, 09:52 AM
|
#13
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 548
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FocusedInfinity
I'd recommend not upgrading your OS unless you're upgrading your hardware too. If the hardware is meeting your needs, then don't waste your money.
Most people I've helped make the move from XP to Win 7 has involved the move from 32bit to 64bit. Although XP has a 64bit version it wasn't widely adopted. That allows for virtually unlimited RAM rather than the 3.6ish GB you're capped at. If you're only using office and a web browser, you're not likely going to need it. It also provides better support for SSD drives and the like. One thing to keep in mind is paripherials like printers. If you move to 64 bit, a lot of manufacturers did not release 64 bit drivers meaning you could have to replace an older printer as well. I also think W7 is much more user friendly. It does things proactively like defragging your hard drive. Much better driver support, etc.
If you're also the kind of person who gets angry when the next version comes out - W8 isn't far off. W7 is tried and true to me and I can't predict if W8 is going to be solid or another W ME/Vista.
|
I have an 8 year old Dell desktop with XP Pro Service Pack 3. Recently, the PC appeared to have crashed when I logged on. I left the PC for awhile and when I came back the PC had loaded. I logged off and retried a couple of times. Then I picked up my trusty, corded, land line phone and called Dell tech support. I had to pay for this since my PC is way out of warranty. I was on the phone so long I felt like I had developed a personal relationship with the tech support rep. She said she was in Manila and spoke better English than I do. She waited while I opened the PC case and swapped RAM cards. The diagnosis was that one of the RAM cards had failed. She ordered and sent new RAM cards that increased my RAM to the XP maximum. This seems to have cured that problem.
Another problem with my XP is that it will not recognize SDHC cards 8gb and above. They work fine in DW's laptop with Windows 7. Microsoft says there is a hotfix for this, but it only applies to XP SP2 and not to my XP SP3. When I try to download the hotfix, it says I do not need it.
|
|
|
03-10-2012, 10:50 AM
|
#14
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 13,130
|
In my earlier days, I wanted the latetest and greatest. But now, I resigned to the fact that those getting the latest and greatest are also the guinea pigs for the system. Today, I'd rather stick with the old and steady until it no longer meets my needs.
On keeping the OS clean, every so often when the system is running so sluggish, I make sure I have the data stored externally, then do a restore of the system from a clean, stable backup. Just did that the other day to my Win XP home system and now it's runny smoothly for the time being.
__________________
Have you ever seen a headstone with these words
"If only I had spent more time at work" ... from "Busy Man" sung by Billy Ray Cyrus
|
|
|
03-10-2012, 12:55 PM
|
#15
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: North-Central Illinois
Posts: 3,228
|
The desktop and laptop that I use the most both have XP on them, and I use OpenOffice, and an OLD version of EudoraPro for email (that was hacked using a keygen about a decade ago).
Heck, I still have one computer that's running WindowsNT that I don't use hardly ever anymore, but has my AutoCad program on it. And out in my workshop I still have an Ooooold 486 running MSDOS 7.2 and Windows 3.1, that I use for writing notes and keeping track of the collection of my hobby stuff. I back that up to a 3.5" floppy and then "sync" that onto my desktop.
I'm thinking about a major upgrade in the shop this year! I might move my 14 year old Dell laptop (w/ WinXP & a wifi card) out there, and retire the 486 from active duty. Haha!
|
|
|
03-15-2012, 08:33 PM
|
#16
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 153
|
Thanks for all the great input.....!! Will keep my XP Pro Serv. Pak 3 going on all machines for now and use Office 2003 and Open Office!
|
|
|
03-16-2012, 06:02 AM
|
#17
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: On a hill in the Pine Barrens
Posts: 9,683
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JakeBrake
Another problem with my XP is that it will not recognize SDHC cards 8gb and above. They work fine in DW's laptop with Windows 7. Microsoft says there is a hotfix for this, but it only applies to XP SP2 and not to my XP SP3. When I try to download the hotfix, it says I do not need it.
|
It could be the power requirements of the SDHC card. Still, you're stymied.
|
|
|
03-16-2012, 06:04 AM
|
#18
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: On a hill in the Pine Barrens
Posts: 9,683
|
I support a lot of XP systems, and have a few at home. WIn7 was so fast on my dual-processor notebook when new. MS fixed that with a hundred or more updates.
Don't upgrade to Win7 on old hardware. Take your time and identify a reliable PC or notebook, and go from there.
|
|
|
03-16-2012, 08:28 AM
|
#19
|
gone traveling
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: DFW
Posts: 7,586
|
XP Pro user here. When present desktop dies, I'm going switch to either a MacBook Pro or iMac.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|