Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
"2.5% is all I need to live on"
Old 01-25-2008, 05:53 AM   #1
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,288
"2.5% is all I need to live on"

I just read a thread where a poster said something to the effect of "our pension meets most of our needs so we will only have a withdraw rate of 2.5% from our IRA".

Not to pick on him, as its his money to do with what he pleases, but Im just wondering why people think this way. Im dead center of the LBYM crowd and my savings rate during this accumulation phase is VERY large. It boggles my mind how much my wife and I are saving (while still not feeling like we are sacrificing much)....BUT...the whole point of this for me is to live much more comfortably in retirement.

I have a pension also, and if I retired in my current house, I could live with a zero % withdrawal rate and maintain my current lifestyle in retirement, but why would I want to do that? Initially , the whole point of saving was to make sure I could retire without having to eat dogfood. At this point, I want to live the best retirement possible. I want to move to a nicer more expensive area, travel extensively, have nicer cars, get a boat...ect..

I want to withdraw the maximum amount possible (as per firecalc) and let that determine my standard of living which will be extravagant compared to how we live now as oppossed to continuing to live like we do now and letting my assets grow to millions and millions for someone else to enjoy.

Sure I want to leave money for my son, but assumming that FireCalc is correct and withdrawing 4% will allow you to never run out of money, there will be plenty left for inheritance anyway.

As I said, I live well below my means now so I understand that mindset but I dont understand why people want to continue to do it after retirement.

Thoughts?
utrecht is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 01-25-2008, 06:06 AM   #2
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 479
I agree with you about living large in retirement. But how can you determine that person is or isn't living it up in retirement?

Maybe their pension is 50k and 2.5% of their IRA is 75k.
JohnDoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 06:08 AM   #3
Dryer sheet aficionado
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 40
I agree with you 100%. My intention is to live more richly in retirement, partly because I will have more free time to travel and enjoy life without work getting in the way. I imagine money will go a lot quicker without a job sucking up all of my time :-)

Perhaps there are other rewards for living on less. When something doesn't make sense financially, many times there are psychological rewards, or other intangibles. If the whole point is peace of mind and living on 2.5% gives someone more than living on 3.5-4%, then to them it makes sense. I don't get it myself though :-)
theHundt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 06:17 AM   #4
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,252
I guess we won't extend the argument to ask why you aren't living larger now instead of waiting later when you retire.
LOL! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 06:34 AM   #5
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,305
I respect everyone to be able to decide what their own comfort level is. After years of LBYM and 6.75 months of retirement, I have been watching my DW. We are comfortably traveling right now, but she still has a hard sometimes 'treating' herself. It took a while for us to accumulate this nest egg and while I am in a hurry for some things, I am in no particular hurry to blow the whole wad. But for every time my DW balks at 'an extra', I sneak in a nice meal or side trip somewhere.

I suspect that with a pension and a dinosaur size nestegg, one could take less at the beginning and ease into the yacht and lear jet.

...but I did celebrate my event with a bottle of dom ... and DW got me 2 bottles of Remy XO Grand Cru ... the only problem is you start to get used to that stuff ...
__________________
Life is GREAT!
megacorp-firee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 06:36 AM   #6
Moderator Emeritus
W2R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 47,474
Quote:
Originally Posted by utrecht View Post
I just read a thread where a poster said something to the effect of "our pension meets most of our needs so we will only have a withdraw rate of 2.5% from our IRA".

Not to pick on him, as its his money to do with what he pleases, but Im just wondering why people think this way. Im dead center of the LBYM crowd and my savings rate during this accumulation phase is VERY large. It boggles my mind how much my wife and I are saving (while still not feeling like we are sacrificing much)....BUT...the whole point of this for me is to live much more comfortably in retirement.

I have a pension also, and if I retired in my current house, I could live with a zero % withdrawal rate and maintain my current lifestyle in retirement, but why would I want to do that? Initially , the whole point of saving was to make sure I could retire without having to eat dogfood. At this point, I want to live the best retirement possible. I want to move to a nicer more expensive area, travel extensively, have nicer cars, get a boat...ect..

I want to withdraw the maximum amount possible (as per firecalc) and let that determine my standard of living which will be extravagant compared to how we live now as oppossed to continuing to live like we do now and letting my assets grow to millions and millions for someone else to enjoy.

Sure I want to leave money for my son, but assumming that FireCalc is correct and withdrawing 4% will allow you to never run out of money, there will be plenty left for inheritance anyway.

As I said, I live well below my means now so I understand that mindset but I dont understand why people want to continue to do it after retirement.

Thoughts?
Very thought provoking question. I think I my thoughts have been similar to those you describe. Due to a windfall that I did not expect and have not been counting on, it looks like I will be able to spend about 2-4 times as much in retirement as I have been spending in recent years. So, my withdrawal rate will probably be low?

Part of the disconnect is that I have never lived on that much. I am having a hard time imagining that I would want to spend that much time shopping when I could be doing more meaningful things. I have no desire to travel, and I do not want a McMansion because I live alone. Most expensive cars like Jaguars and such have terrible reliability ratings. My ex and I had a boat and I am familiar with what that entails, and don't want one.

What I would really like is to spend my final years in a top quality continuous care facility like my mother did. We never had to worry about her being abused or mistreated when she was old and helpless. I think that is wonderful. She had wonderful, healthy food available, beautiful surroundings, concerts and lectures, an exercise facility with a trainer who was used to dealing with the elderly in wheelchairs and so on, access to helpers who would do her shopping for her, dress her, and so on, and a skilled nursing floor when she needed that (and another Alzheimers' floor though she never needed that one). Such continuous care facilities are going to cost an arm and a leg by the time we boomers get really old. So, why not let some money grow in preparation for that, and if I don't live that long then the money will go to my daughter.
__________________
Already we are boldly launched upon the deep; but soon we shall be lost in its unshored, harbourless immensities. - - H. Melville, 1851.

Happily retired since 2009, at age 61. Best years of my life by far!
W2R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 06:43 AM   #7
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,288
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOL! View Post
I guess we won't extend the argument to ask why you aren't living larger now instead of waiting later when you retire.
I think thats obvious isnt it?

I have XXXX amount of money coming in right now. But I have to work to get that amount and I need to save for the future.

Retirement is different. I dont need to save for the future because I have enough money and 45 withdrawal will never run out. Why not spend my full 4% even though its much more than im used to spending?

If you want to compare that to now, you would have to make give me a job I loved, make it a job that I would always love and pay me an amount of money that would always stay constant (with raises for inflation) and guarantee me that the money would never stop. Then I could spend it all and not worry about saving.

So if I was a pro baseball player
loved playing baseball and would always love playing baseball until I died
and was guaranteed to be paid xxxx amount for eternity (plus cost of living raises)

then I would live large now and not have to worry about the future. Until that happens, I need to save for retirement.
utrecht is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 06:46 AM   #8
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,288
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnDoe View Post
I agree with you about living large in retirement. But how can you determine that person is or isn't living it up in retirement?

Maybe their pension is 50k and 2.5% of their IRA is 75k.
So? Thats $125K which may be much more than they are used to living on, but why not make it $50K pension and $120K from IRA (4%) for a total of $170K. The money wont run out and you will still leave millions to your hiers.

I do agree that it will probably be hard for me to flip a switch from saver to spender, but im going to do my damndest.
utrecht is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 06:56 AM   #9
Recycles dryer sheets
Culture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 491
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOL! View Post
I guess we won't extend the argument to ask why you aren't living larger now instead of waiting later when you retire.
As has already been discussed, reasons vary. For me, I do not have time to enjoy spending money. What is the point of having a bunch of toys I cannot enjoy? The reason that today is my last day at work is not because I hate my job. It is the best place I have every worked, and I am treated like a king (I guess in a sense I am one of the kings there). I am quiting because I have no free time. By saving while we worked, we are now able to start our own business (i.e. because I do not need to work, there is no risk for me in starting my business). Hopefully we will make 50-75% of what we made before, and gain 50 hours/week of time. If we don't we will gain even more free time. Win-Win.

Anyway, that is why I do not spend now, but intend to spend in the future.
Culture is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 07:22 AM   #10
Dryer sheet aficionado
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by Culture View Post
As has already been discussed, reasons vary. For me, I do not have time to enjoy spending money. What is the point of having a bunch of toys I cannot enjoy?
There have already been some good answers that I am in agreement with, especially the one quoted above. On top of those, my reason is pretty simple, flexibility and compounding interest, the future is uncertain. I have 20 years give or take until retirement and I have enough for the necessities and some perks as well as adding a decent chunk to savings. For now, this is what makes the most sense to me.
theHundt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 07:35 AM   #11
Moderator
Walt34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Eastern WV Panhandle
Posts: 25,302
Interesting how people are all over the map on this. We're sort of "middle of the road" on it, our current income is about what we were living on when working. Neither of us has much interest in extensive travel although day trips or one-to-two day trips are fun. I have a small 10-foot boat for fishing that stays in the garage.

We value the free time and no work pressures. My ex was one who had to spend every dime immediately and the marriage ended when I refused to take a loan for a trip when we were already flat broke.
__________________
When I was a kid I wanted to be older. This is not what I expected.
Walt34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 07:45 AM   #12
Gone but not forgotten
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sarasota,fl.
Posts: 11,447
I really tried to spend 4% the first year and even with the travel and paying for my Mom's health aide plus outfitting a nursery for my daughter I failed miserably .I'll try harder this year .
Moemg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 08:02 AM   #13
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,305
This is a real interesting post to me, because, in my w*rk career, I was a planner. I would recognize that there were unknowns, but you had to make decisions as best you could anyways.
Now that I am recently retired, I have a plan, but I am back to square one as it relates to this retirement stuff. Oh, I'm doing GREAT so far, but there are the unknowns that one has to 'plan' for also (aka plan b, c, d, ...etc.). So while I have planned for a 4% swr, in actuality, so far, some of it (maybe 1% of it, ytd) is still sitting in the money market account. I think that if it is still 'stuck' there at the end of 1 year, maybe I'll spend some of it on wine and women, ... and then squander the rest.
As in my w*rk life, I always made my quota, goals, objectives, ...etc. Habits being what they are, I will do my best to make my 4% plan.
...where's that travel brochure?
__________________
Life is GREAT!
megacorp-firee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 08:41 AM   #14
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Dawg52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Central MS/Orange Beach, AL
Posts: 9,067
I think some who post a small % may be referring to their basic budget without all the extras. I'm sure I will splurge some years. Might take a trip to NZ someday. That would certainly knock a hole in the 2.5% budget.
__________________
Retired 3/31/2007@52
Investing style: Full time wuss.
Dawg52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 09:08 AM   #15
Recycles dryer sheets
Abreutime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 325
It's reasonable for someone newly retired to spend more conservatively at first, especially if 2.5% is still more than their spending pre-retirement. It's easy to expand your spending when you see the nest-egg expanding too quickly!
Abreutime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 09:12 AM   #16
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,305
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abreutime View Post
It's easy to expand your spending when you see the nest-egg expanding too quickly!
... from your lips to god ...
__________________
Life is GREAT!
megacorp-firee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 09:34 AM   #17
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,366
I have run projections that say I could spend an extra $100k per year if I work another 10 years (I'm 53). But that isn't worth it to me. My FIRE is at roughly the equivalent of 4%, and I can spend a little less or more as circumstances dictate. I probably won't be going as low as 2.5%. I'd try to spend more if tht happened.

My goal has been to maintain essentially a constant spending level (plus inflation) from work through retirement.

Dan
Animorph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 09:52 AM   #18
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
donheff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 11,318
I generally agree with the OP's sentiments. But I understand dialing it back a bit - at least in the early years of ER. When DW retires next year we are planning to start pulling at a fair amount less than 4% (although we will still be livin pretty large). We still have 30 years ahead of us and want to be sure it lasts. If all goes well with the market we will probably kick it up to 4% a few years later by tipping the trips up a notch on the luxury scale.
__________________
Idleness is fatal only to the mediocre -- Albert Camus
donheff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 10:08 AM   #19
Confused about dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1
Newly signed on and this caught my eye quickly.

I'm at an age where the idea of spending large is not as attractive as 15 years ago and now it's obvious I could have spent more then. But I looked for the 2.5% post and if it's the one on living off fixed income, that person seemed to be saying 2.5% of an IRA. So I suspect they were still worried about outliving the funds.

I think living large is relative and if it's something that bring joy, I'm all for it.

And believe it or not , folks in nursing homes still have the "keep up with the Jonses" urge. So save some funds for that.
Still Joad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 10:12 AM   #20
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
REWahoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Still Joad View Post
And believe it or not , folks in nursing homes still have the "keep up with the Jonses" urge. So save some funds for that.
Yep. No doubt I'll be wanting a set of oversize chrome rims for my wheelchair.
__________________
Numbers is hard
REWahoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Windows Live ID Login" Appears TromboneAl Other topics 4 09-14-2007 10:34 AM
"Work Less, Live More" radicals picket in Charlotte, NC! Nords Life after FIRE 5 05-05-2007 01:40 PM
Allow changing the 4% parameter in "Work Less, Live More" option? wasdana FIRECalc support 0 08-12-2006 08:41 AM
Do you get "paid" to live in high cost of living areas? wildcat Young Dreamers 31 02-19-2006 03:50 PM
Book report: "Work Less, Live More" Nords FIRE and Money 19 11-17-2005 09:10 AM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:23 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.