|
01-04-2012, 05:14 AM
|
#1
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,009
|
2025 Fund VTTVX
Am thinking of putting my entire 401k into VTTVX and letting it ride.
Tired of fooling with it. Plan to retire in 5 yrs, but will keep some $$ in this fund after retirement. Thoughts? I know many here like to do there own thing. It just seems hard to beat with an expense ratio of .18%
Just mentioning it as these funds don't get talked about much here.
Thanks in advance........
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
01-04-2012, 06:54 PM
|
#2
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,366
|
As long as that's the fund with the equity allocation and glide path you like, it should serve well. My DS is just a year into his job. He doesn't want to think about investing much yet, so the farthest out retirement date fund works for him.
|
|
|
01-04-2012, 06:57 PM
|
#3
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,009
|
Ok...............
|
|
|
01-04-2012, 07:04 PM
|
#4
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N. Yorkshire
Posts: 34,128
|
I rolled my entire 401k to VTENX (Tgt 2010) in Jan, 2010. I don't intend to do anything with it. Let the VG computers manage the re-balancing and changing of the AA as the years go by.
__________________
Retired in Jan, 2010 at 55, moved to England in May 2016
Enough private pension and SS income to cover all needs
|
|
|
01-04-2012, 07:32 PM
|
#5
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 115
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by almost there
Am thinking of putting my entire 401k into VTTVX and letting it ride.
Tired of fooling with it. Plan to retire in 5 yrs, but will keep some $$ in this fund after retirement. Thoughts? I know many here like to do there own thing. It just seems hard to beat with an expense ratio of .18%
Just mentioning it as these funds don't get talked about much here.
Thanks in advance........
|
If you are planning to retire in 5 years (2017), and planning to keep some money in the fund after retirement, you should have a target fund that coincides with when you will be taking the money out, not 8 years after that time. Generally target funds take more risk the further out they are dated so you may not have received the return that you expected on your money.
|
|
|
01-04-2012, 09:14 PM
|
#6
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,366
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by james7
If you are planning to retire in 5 years (2017), and planning to keep some money in the fund after retirement, you should have a target fund that coincides with when you will be taking the money out, not 8 years after that time. Generally target funds take more risk the further out they are dated so you may not have received the return that you expected on your money.
|
The target retirement plans probably assume retire-at-65. For RE, and for those with more aggressive tastes a later date might be better. Given the wide range of allocations between target date funds from different companies, it's all pretty much whatever makes you feel good anyway.
|
|
|
01-08-2012, 08:53 AM
|
#7
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,009
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Animorph
The target retirement plans probably assume retire-at-65. For RE, and for those with more aggressive tastes a later date might be better. Given the wide range of allocations between target date funds from different companies, it's all pretty much whatever makes you feel good anyway.
|
I dumped it in last week. & Feel good.
Plan to retire at 55, & just let the fund roll till 2025 when I'm 65.
Talk about simple........ Could it really be that easy?
Have had my Roth with Vanguard in a 2020 fund for a while now & am very pleased with it. I guess it can be just that easy.
And am now looking back at the thousands of hours I took over the past 25 yrs trying to figure things out. Am pretty sure I would have made much more just doing something like this from the get go.
|
|
|
01-08-2012, 12:13 PM
|
#8
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 640
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by almost there
And am now looking back at the thousands of hours I took over the past 25 yrs trying to figure things out. Am pretty sure I would have made much more just doing something like this from the get go.
|
After reading a multitude of books in anticipation of slicing and dicing my portfolio, I came to the same conclusion. Best to keep it simple.
My preferred alternative (for the nontaxable portion) is the Vanguard LifeStrategy Moderate Growth Fund, which has a 0.16 expense rate and was recently changed by Vanguard into a combination of index funds. From the Vanguard website (as of 11/30/11):
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Investor Shares 42.7%
Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund Investor Shares 39.2%
Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Investor Shares 18.1%
No glide path, of course. So, which one you prefer depends on whether you think it's best to stick to one allocation (what LifeStrategy funds offer) or have it adjusted for you as the years go by (what the Target funds offer).
|
|
|
01-08-2012, 03:20 PM
|
#9
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,366
|
I'm a slicer & dicer. I like larger small-cap and value and international allocations, and no bonds to speak of. It also allows some additional rebalancing opportunities. But it does take some work to set up, track, and rebalance. I enjoy that, but it's probably not for most people. The target date funds give you some nice diversity without all the work.
|
|
|
01-08-2012, 06:01 PM
|
#10
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: northern Michigan
Posts: 2,215
|
Nothing wrong with VTTVX, but I would personally not be comfortable with putting a chunk of my retirement funds into any fund (or mix of funds) and just ignoring it for 5+ years. It might work out just fine, but it's always possible to have another year like 2008, too. If you are prepared to accept that kind of loss right before retirement, then no problem. But if not, then I would at least keep an eye on your investments, and be prepared to take defensive action if necessary. I guess that makes me a market timer, but so be it.......
|
|
|
01-09-2012, 04:56 AM
|
#11
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,009
|
Here is what it boils down to.
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Inv 50.89%
Vanguard Total Bond Market II Idx Inv 27.36%
Vanguard Total Intl Stock Index Inv 21.72%
Just over 2% yield, .18% expense ratio & auto re balancing down the road.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|