|
|
4% rule for 2018 - Pfau updates the charts
01-13-2018, 08:53 AM
|
#1
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: London/UK (dual US/UK citizen)
Posts: 502
|
4% rule for 2018 - Pfau updates the charts
FYI Pfau has updated the charts supporting the 4% rule for 2018 here:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/wadepfa.../#68f3b9746be4
The summary - keep a solid chunk in stocks and the 4% rule still holds for a 30-year retirement with the potential for a good upside surprise for your heirs or for the managed-care facility owners.
It is always useful and reassuring to see that the basic research holds up. Unlike that on coffee, fats, wine, salt and whatever else that seems to zoom from being bad for you to being good for you!
In all things, moderation and flexibility!
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
01-13-2018, 09:25 AM
|
#2
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 145
|
Thanks for sharing!
|
|
|
01-13-2018, 10:05 AM
|
#3
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,525
|
Reassuring to see Pfau's results holding at 4%. Yet the new normal frequently mentioned seems to be in the 2.5% -3.5% range and many retirees seem to strive for that range as a goal. I guess there will be many happy heirs.
|
|
|
01-13-2018, 10:12 AM
|
#4
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,518
|
Thanks for the link and article. I don't see Mr. Pfau actually embracing the 4% as safe. It appears to me he is just explaining Berger's work and how the methodology determined that 4% was a safe withdrawal rate.
He references a 1/15 webinar titled "How Much Can I Spend in Retirement?" We will probably see there if he agrees with the 4% or continues to advocate a lower rate.
|
|
|
01-13-2018, 10:18 AM
|
#5
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: The Bay Area
Posts: 2,736
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB
Thanks for the link and article. I don't see Mr. Pfau actually embracing the 4% as safe. It appears to me he is just explaining Berger's work and how the methodology determined that 4% was a safe withdrawal rate.
He references a 1/15 webinar titled "How Much Can I Spend in Retirement?" We will probably see there if he agrees with the 4% or continues to advocate a lower rate.
|
That’s my take as well.
Below is a link to another recent Pfau article on today’s SWR, with an excerpt ( my bolding), which clearly states that 4% is not safe for today’s retirees.
https://retirementresearcher.com/sus...retirees-2016/
“To be conservative, a lower withdrawal rate is required to account for the additional random fluctuations from outside the model. This analysis further confirms the idea that the 4% withdrawal rate cannot be treated as safe for retirees in today’s market environment.”
__________________
You may be whatever you resolve to be.
100% x 10% > 10% x 100%
Small pensions & SS cover essentials
|
|
|
01-13-2018, 10:47 AM
|
#6
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,525
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huston55
That’s my take as well.
Below is a link to another recent Pfau article on today’s SWR, with an excerpt ( my bolding), which clearly states that 4% is not safe for today’s retirees.
https://retirementresearcher.com/sus...retirees-2016/
“To be conservative, a lower withdrawal rate is required to account for the additional random fluctuations from outside the model. This analysis further confirms the idea that the 4% withdrawal rate cannot be treated as safe for retirees in today’s market environment.”
|
Yes, he does state in that article that the 4% WR is not safe for today's environment yet the equation he developed in that article predicts a 4.16% SWR for a 2016 retiree.
I guess we always get back to the general understanding that yes 4% was safe in the past but who knows what kind of crappy environment we may encounter in the future so might as well drop that WR as low as we possibly can just in case.
|
|
|
01-13-2018, 10:59 AM
|
#7
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2006
Location: west coast, hi there!
Posts: 8,797
|
I would expect that 1966 will be the worst year for SAFEMAX for many years to come. It would take many years of bad returns to see any change in this conclusion. So good years like 2017 will not change any conclusions in the Bengen study. But this was a nice review article.
I have not read the other Pfau papers. My thought is that we will at some point have a nasty bear market and all the forward estimates will shift. Then maybe the forward SAFEMAX will shift too and the sun will come out?
|
|
|
01-13-2018, 11:09 AM
|
#8
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,525
|
Ah!, with all the exuberance of recent times I had forgotten but now I remember Bernstein's wonderful retirement calculator from hell series to put things in perspective.
|
|
|
01-13-2018, 11:32 AM
|
#9
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: The Bay Area
Posts: 2,736
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ejman
Ah!, with all the exuberance of recent times I had forgotten but now I remember Bernstein's wonderful retirement calculator from hell series to put things in perspective.
|
Yep, if TS really does HTF, that’s my back-up back-up plan...move to Hell.
I figure the COL is low, especially real estate (compared to where I am now). But, utilities might be a little pricey.
__________________
You may be whatever you resolve to be.
100% x 10% > 10% x 100%
Small pensions & SS cover essentials
|
|
|
01-13-2018, 11:42 AM
|
#10
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Newcastle, WA
Posts: 208
|
Annuitize some. Solves a lot of problems.
__________________
Don't just do something; stand there!
- Jack Bogle
|
|
|
01-13-2018, 12:53 PM
|
#11
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,000
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawrence of Suburbia
Annuitize some. Solves a lot of problems.
|
Especially for your heirs. They won't have to figure out what to do with all that inheritance money.
__________________
Numbers is hard
|
|
|
01-13-2018, 01:24 PM
|
#12
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,525
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawrence of Suburbia
Annuitize some. Solves a lot of problems.
|
Maybe so but my understanding is that insurance companies invest in pretty much the same vehicles that are available to us little investors and my question then becomes if there is really a systemic SHTF situation a la Bernstein series where are the insurance companies going to get the money to pay out? I know there are small State funds designed to cover some limits but I suspect those are designed for individual companies failing, not systemic events.
And if the above holds, then my investments ( assuming a nice diversified portfolio) will do as well or better than the annuity in the regular order of events (after all, I don't need to pay for that wonderful insurance building, and jets and all that) and if the SHTF I suspect the insurance company will say sayonara.
|
|
|
01-13-2018, 01:25 PM
|
#13
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 18,085
|
Isn't Pfau the one that hawks annuities? Of course he is going to say that doing without one is dangerous.
__________________
"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."
- George Orwell
Ezekiel 23:20
|
|
|
01-13-2018, 01:52 PM
|
#14
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,934
|
__________________
And if I claim to be a wise man, it surely means that I don't know.
|
|
|
01-13-2018, 02:10 PM
|
#15
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Chicago West Burbs
Posts: 2,996
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawrence of Suburbia
Annuitize some. Solves a lot of problems.
|
If my recent experience with trying to get an answer from a large insurance co is any indication, in a word, no. I have been trying to initiate a simple surrender process under the terms stated in a small MetLife policy for well over 2 months now. I'm not a happy camper. Blatantly wrong answers from their direct customer support line. I contacted one of their sales agents (Mass Mutual) for help. She contacted one of the MetLife spin offs. They gave her bad advice. She then called another spin off from MetLife and they said they would have an answer in 10 business days. That was on Dec 8th. Since I didn't get a reply, I called my agent earlier in the week to find out what the current status was. She said she'd look into it. I got no reply. So yesterday I called back, left a voicemail and, my agent didn't return my call. I may have to contact my State's Insurance dept for assistance.
No way would I give them a goodly amount of my hard earned cash.
|
|
|
01-13-2018, 02:16 PM
|
#16
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,252
|
Perhaps a good rule-of-thumb is to retire when you reach your number despite two years in a row of bad stock market performance.
Conversely, do not retire just because you reach your number after two years in a row of great stock market performance.
|
|
|
01-13-2018, 02:38 PM
|
#17
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: DC area
Posts: 2,464
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOL!
Perhaps a good rule-of-thumb is to retire when you reach your number despite two years in a row of bad stock market performance.
Conversely, do not retire just because you reach your number after two years in a row of great stock market performance.
|
Hmm, a rule of thumb for a rule of thumb? But why not use a 3-year look back, or 4 years, or one?
Your first example isn't really a stress test, rather it is setting up one of those excess wealth scenarios where you could have drawn 6% or 7%. Your heirs will love it.
The 4% SWR already includes cases like the second. The market ran up smartly for about 7 years leading to 1929 and for three years leading to 1966, yet 4% SAFEMAX worked for 30 years with reasonable AAs. We'll see how 2000 works out, but analyses I've seen recently say it will be OK.
Anyway, 4% SWR is just a rule of thumb for planning, and is derived from an inflexible model, so take it as input and do what makes you feel comfortable.
__________________
FI and Semi-ER March 24, 2017
Consulting to stay engaged
"All models are wrong, some are useful." - George Box
“There is always a well-known solution to every human problem: neat, plausible, and wrong.” - H.L. Mencken
|
|
|
01-13-2018, 05:21 PM
|
#18
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,204
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ejman
Maybe so but my understanding is that insurance companies invest in pretty much the same vehicles that are available to us little investors .....
|
I guess it depends on what you have in mind, but the vast majority of assets backing annuities are invested in bonds.... probably close to 100%.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.
Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
|
|
|
01-13-2018, 06:45 PM
|
#19
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 271
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CRLLS
If my recent experience with trying to get an answer from a large insurance co is any indication, in a word, no. I have been trying to initiate a simple surrender process under the terms stated in a small MetLife policy for well over 2 months now. I'm not a happy camper. Blatantly wrong answers from their direct customer support line. I contacted one of their sales agents (Mass Mutual) for help. She contacted one of the MetLife spin offs. They gave her bad advice. She then called another spin off from MetLife and they said they would have an answer in 10 business days. That was on Dec 8th. Since I didn't get a reply, I called my agent earlier in the week to find out what the current status was. She said she'd look into it. I got no reply. So yesterday I called back, left a voicemail and, my agent didn't return my call. I may have to contact my State's Insurance dept for assistance.
No way would I give them a goodly amount of my hard earned cash.
|
If your talking surrender fees then your not talking about a SPIA. Pfau only recommends SPIA type annuities.
|
|
|
01-13-2018, 07:50 PM
|
#20
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 271
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huston55
That’s my take as well.
Below is a link to another recent Pfau article on today’s SWR, with an excerpt ( my bolding), which clearly states that 4% is not safe for today’s retirees.
https://retirementresearcher.com/sus...retirees-2016/
“To be conservative, a lower withdrawal rate is required to account for the additional random fluctuations from outside the model. This analysis further confirms the idea that the 4% withdrawal rate cannot be treated as safe for retirees in today’s market environment.”
|
Well since we have had 11.96 (2016) and 21.83(2017)S&P returns, I wonder if he will change it to 2017 retirees. The first 5 years are the most critical years. I refer you to his last statement. Flexible is the key word. Of course watch out the sky might hit you.
Unfortunately, we do not know what the future will bring, and, ultimately, retirees should remain cautious and flexible.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|