|
|
10-15-2011, 03:42 PM
|
#1
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 68
|
4% SWR - revisited
I was wondering how many individuals set their initial withdrawal rate greater than 4% (eg 5,6%) until social security kicks in and then reduce it back to 4% after that point. Does anyone know of any studies done on this topic?
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
10-15-2011, 03:54 PM
|
#2
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,021
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by engr
I was wondering how many individuals set their initial withdrawal rate greater than 4% (eg 5,6%) until social security kicks in and then reduce it back to 4% after that point. Does anyone know of any studies done on this topic?
|
I did - although my WR is a little under 4% now that we are both drawing SS.
Can't site any studies, but I do know my numbers worked in FIRECalc...
__________________
Numbers is hard
|
|
|
10-15-2011, 03:58 PM
|
#3
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,872
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by engr
I was wondering how many individuals set their initial withdrawal rate greater than 4% (eg 5,6%) until social security kicks in and then reduce it back to 4% after that point. Does anyone know of any studies done on this topic?
|
In another thread I recently proposed a 4% WR from my accounts to ER. People were worried about it being unsustainable and pointed out that years with bad returns early on would be a severe blow to my plan. However, nobody made your point. With an initial 4% WR I can cover my expenses. I'll have to do that from 50 to 66 when I expect to get SS. If I inflate my budget by 3% a year to 66 I find that SS, a small pension and rent from an apartment I own will cover all my expenses.
|
|
|
10-15-2011, 04:14 PM
|
#4
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 47,500
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by engr
I was wondering how many individuals set their initial withdrawal rate greater than 4% (eg 5,6%) until social security kicks in and then reduce it back to 4% after that point. Does anyone know of any studies done on this topic?
|
I do plan to withdraw less after I claim SS than I am now. I am already withdrawing less than 4%, though. I have been retired only about two years, and I am still trying to get used to the idea of withdrawing anything at all.
__________________
Already we are boldly launched upon the deep; but soon we shall be lost in its unshored, harbourless immensities. - - H. Melville, 1851.
Happily retired since 2009, at age 61. Best years of my life by far!
|
|
|
10-15-2011, 04:22 PM
|
#5
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,366
|
I could be at 6% or so for a couple of years if DW decides to retire soon. That gets the last son through college. Then I run at about 4% until SS kicks in and maybe 2% by the time everything comes on line. You can run that kind of scenario through FIRECalc. You should also pretty much have the cash for those first high-expense years (assuming 2-3 years) in hand before retiring so you can avoid problems with the market tanking just when (or slightly before) you retire.
|
|
|
10-15-2011, 04:34 PM
|
#6
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,361
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by engr
I was wondering how many individuals set their initial withdrawal rate greater than 4% (eg 5,6%) until social security kicks in and then reduce it back to 4% after that point. Does anyone know of any studies done on this topic?
|
Not aware of any studies, but keep in mind that 4% is from now to the end of time. In my case, my withdrawal rate will be close to 5% initially, decline to 4% when I start drawing an employer defined benefit pension at 60 and will be minimal once I turn 70 and begin collecting SS.
If the withdrawal rate was much higher than 5%, I'm not sure how comfortable I would feel.
|
|
|
10-15-2011, 04:43 PM
|
#7
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,021
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pb4uski
...and will be minimal once I turn 70 and begin collecting SS.
|
Will this be true even after RMD's kick in?
__________________
Numbers is hard
|
|
|
10-15-2011, 04:57 PM
|
#8
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,366
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by REWahoo
Will this be true even after RMD's kick in?
|
When RMD's kick in my taxable portfolio comes back to life. It's not a withdrawal, just a conversion from IRA to taxable.
|
|
|
10-15-2011, 05:02 PM
|
#9
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,021
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Animorph
It's not a withdrawal, just a conversion from IRA to taxable.
|
+1
__________________
Numbers is hard
|
|
|
10-15-2011, 07:17 PM
|
#10
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 68
|
I keep reading about how everyone uses firecalc so I went to take another look. It asks what the initial portfolio value is but I don't see where you specify what amount is taxable, Roth or Traditional. Since each is taxed differently, I must be missing on how to specify each amount. Also, when additional monies are requested that will be added to the portfolio before retirement I enter the amount but this is how much money I will be adding to my company's 401K plan (traditional). Again, there must be a way to specify this along with how to enter the company match. I would appreciate any inputs from anyone.
|
|
|
10-15-2011, 07:40 PM
|
#11
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,361
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Animorph
When RMD's kick in my taxable portfolio comes back to life. It's not a withdrawal, just a conversion from IRA to taxable.
|
Agreed. However, from now until 70 I will be doing conversions within the 15% tax bracket to try to minimize RMDs.
|
|
|
10-15-2011, 07:51 PM
|
#12
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,021
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by engr
I keep reading about how everyone uses firecalc so I went to take another look. It asks what the initial portfolio value is but I don't see where you specify what amount is taxable, Roth or Traditional. Since each is taxed differently, I must be missing on how to specify each amount. Also, when additional monies are requested that will be added to the portfolio before retirement I enter the amount but this is how much money I will be adding to my company's 401K plan (traditional). Again, there must be a way to specify this along with how to enter the company match. I would appreciate any inputs from anyone.
|
FIRECalc ignores taxes. See FIRECalc: Why another retirement calculator? for more info.
When entering future contributions, FIRECalc doesn't care if they come from you or from your employer.
__________________
Numbers is hard
|
|
|
10-15-2011, 08:44 PM
|
#13
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,171
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pb4uski
Not aware of any studies, but keep in mind that 4% is from now to the end of time. In my case, my withdrawal rate will be close to 5% initially, decline to 4% when I start drawing an employer defined benefit pension at 60 and will be minimal once I turn 70 and begin collecting SS.
If the withdrawal rate was much higher than 5%, I'm not sure how comfortable I would feel.
|
Not sure by what you mean by "from now to the end of time" but IIRC the 4% withdrawal rate is based on a study for a 30 year retirement and 95% success rate. A WR lower than 4% would be required to make a portfolio last forever. My apologies if I have misunderstood your meaning.
|
|
|
10-15-2011, 11:30 PM
|
#14
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 353
|
Here is a study mentioned that suggests 4% for 30 years is not even close in today's environment, but should be more like 2% or even less. So, if you believe it, withdrawing more than 4% with goal of later withdrawing 4% would contradict this one; especially if your time horizon is longer than 30 years, which is the time interval usually studied for regular, not early, retirement:
http://www.early-retirement.org/foru...ees-58220.html
|
|
|
10-16-2011, 08:15 AM
|
#15
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 11,327
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by REWahoo
|
And engr, that is a feature, not a flaw. It is much simpler and sensible to evaluate your likely tax situation yourself than rely on the sort of broad brush guess that FIRECALC would need to apply were it to evaluate taxable and non-taxable sources. Federal, State, local, employer payroll tax (for DW's small income stream in our case), taxable portions of pensions, capital gains... Trying to guesstimate all of this in FIRECALC would be impossible. Selecting a piece to guesstimate (e.g. FIT) would be more misleading than illuminating.
__________________
Idleness is fatal only to the mediocre -- Albert Camus
|
|
|
10-16-2011, 09:10 AM
|
#16
|
gone traveling
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 156
|
Withdrawal rates
Is the 4% withdrawal rate too conservative? I have run scenarios that show my portfolio increasing to the point where I croak with millions remaining, if the market performs on average. What if you have no plans to pass money to heirs? Does that change the calculation?
.
|
|
|
10-16-2011, 09:22 AM
|
#17
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: GA
Posts: 211
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moneygrubber
Is the 4% withdrawal rate too conservative? I have run scenarios that show my portfolio increasing to the point where I croak with millions remaining, if the market performs on average. What if you have no plans to pass money to heirs? Does that change the calculation?
.
|
It might be too conservative for some. We don't have kids so we are not planning to pass any money on to heirs. I am sure we will take out much more than 4% for a few years before I start taking SS, then reduce it. My wife is 7 years younger so another 7 years after my SS, her SS kicks in and at that point we are probably just taking out the RMD.
Personally I don't get too caught up in SWR talk. I have to take out what I need to live and I am pretty confident I will have more than enough.
|
|
|
10-16-2011, 10:00 AM
|
#18
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N. Yorkshire
Posts: 34,124
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by engr
I was wondering how many individuals set their initial withdrawal rate greater than 4% (eg 5,6%) until social security kicks in and then reduce it back to 4% after that point. Does anyone know of any studies done on this topic?
|
That seems to be a valid approach, and if you use a calculator like FIDO's Retirement Income Planner it will show you year by year where your income is coming from to match your budgeted expenses.
When we RE'ed a couple of years ago, 70% of our planned income came from non-COLA'ed pensions so our withdrawals each year have to make up for inflation for the whole sum, not just on the initial withdrawal. Consequently I set the target SWR at 3% and can see the projected withdrawals increase the WR percentage until we start collecting SS.
__________________
Retired in Jan, 2010 at 55, moved to England in May 2016
Enough private pension and SS income to cover all needs
|
|
|
10-16-2011, 10:07 AM
|
#19
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Oahu
Posts: 26,860
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by smjsl
Here is a study mentioned that suggests 4% for 30 years is not even close in today's environment, but should be more like 2% or even less. So, if you believe it, withdrawing more than 4% with goal of later withdrawing 4% would contradict this one; especially if your time horizon is longer than 30 years, which is the time interval usually studied for regular, not early, retirement:
|
Quote:
Maintaining flexibility with retirement spending is important.
|
I think there are two flaws with that study.
First, it's trying to determine the max withdrawal rate-- the maximum that a retiree could spend every year without paying any attention to any outside economic factors. It's similar to Raddr's hapless Y2K ER who's been blissfully ignorantly spending his 4% every year since Y2K, no matter how dire the projections seem.
Real human ERs don't do that. Some would say that humans can't do that, whether they ER or not. Everyone reduces their spending during bad economic times. "Unfortunately" for the research community, it's darn hard to model... except for Bob Clyatt's system.
Second flaw: Assuming that a 4% SWR means starting at 4%. Yeah, maybe that's what the procedure says, but the math is that some scenarios will start out at 5% or even 6% during down economies. The theory is that the economy will recover, so will the portfolio, and what started as a 6% withdrawal rate will ease off to less. The overall portfolio spending will run out at the same time as the rest because it's followed the overall 4% math.
However the math's not very reassuring. I don't know about you guys, but I'd be terrified to ER at a 6% initial withdrawal while expecting the bear market to go away in a few years. But my feelings are irrelevant because I'd never be able to convince my spouse to have that sort of faith in either the market or in me.
Yet Ty Bernicke has shown (anecdotally, anyway) that annual spending drops over ER. Another study recommends starting at 4%, monitoring the portfolio until it approaches "game over", and then shifting to annuities. Social Security might even be the only annuity necessary. Surely there's an intermediate "gray area" among these alternate scenarios where variable spending and some annuities would boost success.
I think the FIRECalc advantage is being able to run a portfolio and a withdrawal rate against history-- because we humans are too quick to assume that "this time it's different" (and its corollary, "... but it will never change again".) If FIRECalc gives encouraging results (success ratio over 80%) then I'd really scrub the numbers hard for variable spending. I'd annuitize a bare-bones income and invest the rest in value & dividend stocks. I'd definitely cut back to part-time work as soon as I could.
The "problem" with a 100% successful SWR is that it practically guarantees you will have at least a penny left over. In fact, the effort & assets required to boost the success rate from 95% to 100% means that at least 95% of the time you'll have a lot of money left over.
I much prefer using FIRECalc as an initial goal and then adding safety features like Otar's "red light" annuity system or variable spending.
Those insisting that 4% is over should read Bernstein's "Calculator from Hell" articles in the FAQ archives and then consider (at a minimum) Bob Clyatt's 4%/95% rule.
Speaking of "this time it's different": When my daughter was in high school she read a lot of Jane Austen. (I certainly never would have learned what follows, because I don't have the patience to read Austen.) Our daughter had heard us talking about 4%, so she was excited to see Jane referring to "four percenters". It turns out that 19th-century British investors would put their portfolio in long-term 4% bonds and live off their income. Due to the British colonial system and their gold standard, they were effectively maintaining inflation (in the British Isles, anyway) at zero percent-- for an entire century. Note that this modern research article recommends also investing a portion of an ER portfolio in inflation-adjusted bonds. The 19th-century four-percenters would've felt right at home with TIPS.
__________________
*
Co-author (with my daughter) of “Raising Your Money-Savvy Family For Next Generation Financial Independence.”
Author of the book written on E-R.org: "The Military Guide to Financial Independence and Retirement."
I don't spend much time here— please send a PM.
|
|
|
10-16-2011, 10:12 AM
|
#20
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,089
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by engr
I was wondering how many individuals set their initial withdrawal rate greater than 4% (eg 5,6%) until social security kicks in and then reduce it back to 4% after that point. Does anyone know of any studies done on this topic?
|
I am 55. Wife is 50. We are not retired yet but plan to be in 2-3 years, so this is a similar question that we are also looking for an answer. Wife said that when we get to our 70's, we will very likely spend less than our 50's/60's.
Inside FIRECalc, under Spending Model, it is listing Ty Bernicke's "Reality Retirement Planning: A New Paradigm for an Old Science" as an option. I find that if I switch from [Constant Spending Power] option to [Bernicke's Reality Retirement Plan] option, I could increase my initial WR from 4% to 5%, and FIRECalc still gives a much more favorable result.
I will likely do something similar to [Bernicke's Reality Retirement Plan] option, though smaller reduction than his 2-4% reduction each year.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|