View Poll Results: 4% withdrawal
yes 34 53.13%
no 20 31.25%
not sure 10 15.63%
Voters: 64. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
4% withdrawal even with the drop ?
Old 07-12-2008, 11:29 AM   #1
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Moemg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sarasota,fl.
Posts: 4,733
I was wondering how many are sticking with the 4% withdrawal even while the market drops . I have a lot of extra padding in my budget so I'm dropping back to under 3% until I see some positive signs .
Moemg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2008, 11:35 AM   #2
Moderator
ziggy29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 7,253
Unless you think something worse than the Great Depression is coming, 4% should hold.

I don't know that people have been this panicked about their money in more than 60 years, and if that feeling persists or gets worse, you never know what self-fulfilling prophecies may lie ahead.
__________________
"Hey, for every ten dollars, that's another hour that I have to be in the work place. That's an hour of my life. And my life is a very finite thing. I have only 'x' number of hours left before I'm dead. So how do I want to use these hours of my life? Do I want to use them just spending it on more crap and more stuff, or do I want to start getting a handle on it and using my life more intelligently?" -- Joe Dominguez (1938 - 1997)
ziggy29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2008, 11:38 AM   #3
Full time employment: Posting here.
tangomonster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 586
I was doing less than 4% even before the drop-----

but if my net worth keeps shrinking I may have to end up doing much more than 4%! Scary!
__________________
A wise woman should have money in her head, but not in her heart---Jonathan Swift
tangomonster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2008, 11:56 AM   #4
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,302
If you are using the "4% of year end balance" rule, your withdrawals reduce automatically when your portfolio declines. That's one of the nice features of that model--it explicitly accounts for the behavior most of us actually exhibit when things get rough.

Time for a gut check for those counting on the "4% of begining balance + inflation forever" withdrawal model. If, today, you aren't comfortable withdrawing some pre-determined amount regardless of market conditions, maybe you should switch withdrawal models and see what FIRECALC gives as a result. Imagine we were having 10% inflation and your portfolio were really down 5%, would you REALLY just automatically withdraw the pre-set amount from the previous year (representing 4% of the start value with all the inflation updates) plus 10% extra to account for inflation?
__________________
"Freedom begins when you tell Mrs. Grundy to go fly a kite." - R. Heinlein
samclem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2008, 12:14 PM   #5
Moderator
ziggy29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 7,253
Quote:
Originally Posted by samclem View Post
Time for a gut check for those counting on the "4% of begining balance + inflation forever" withdrawal model. If, today, you aren't comfortable withdrawing some pre-determined amount regardless of market conditions, maybe you should switch withdrawal models and see what FIRECALC gives as a result. Imagine we were having 10% inflation and your portfolio were really down 5%, would you REALLY just automatically withdraw the pre-set amount from the previous year (representing 4% of the start value with all the inflation updates) plus 10% extra to account for inflation?
Keep in mind that this model survived the Great Depression and the high inflation bad market of the 1970s. We tend to have short memories about things like this that make us think these are the worst and the scariest times ever.

Having said that, just because "4% plus inflation for life" hasn't ever failed with a 60/40 portfolio doesn't mean it *can't* fail. Then again, there are no guarantees for *any* level.
__________________
"Hey, for every ten dollars, that's another hour that I have to be in the work place. That's an hour of my life. And my life is a very finite thing. I have only 'x' number of hours left before I'm dead. So how do I want to use these hours of my life? Do I want to use them just spending it on more crap and more stuff, or do I want to start getting a handle on it and using my life more intelligently?" -- Joe Dominguez (1938 - 1997)
ziggy29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2008, 09:46 AM   #6
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
cute fuzzy bunny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Losing my whump
Posts: 22,526
Its probably prudent to cut back a little when times are tough. I certainly wouldnt be pulling extra money out just to meet the 4% guideline.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ziggy29 View Post
Keep in mind that this model survived the Great Depression and the high inflation bad market of the 1970s. We tend to have short memories about things like this that make us think these are the worst and the scariest times ever.

Having said that, just because "4% plus inflation for life" hasn't ever failed with a 60/40 portfolio doesn't mean it *can't* fail. Then again, there are no guarantees for *any* level.
Yeah, but many of those successful runs almost failed or came down to extremely low balances. I think the good question here is whether people would be brave enough to keep taking their 4% when they were down 40-50-60%. Heck, just a little bear market has everyone eying the windows.

Quote:
Originally Posted by haha View Post
What I find really funny is that for years anyone who suggested on these forums that valuation of stocks mattered in choosing a withdrawal rate was stoned.
When did that happen, because I dont remember it? I do remember one guy who mentioned valuations as part of his trolling routine. Since that guy was banned by 12 other forums and two of them collapsed as part of his antics, it seems like kicking him off was reasonable and prudent.

That guy also proposed a valuation system that would have kept people out of the stock market since 1993.

How would that have worked out for you folks?
__________________

Many an optimist has become rich by buying out a pessimist
cute fuzzy bunny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2008, 10:50 AM   #7
Moderator
W2R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 10,395
Quote:
Originally Posted by cute fuzzy bunny View Post
J(...) but many of those successful runs almost failed or came down to extremely low balances. I think the good question here is whether people would be brave enough to keep taking their 4% when they were down 40-50-60%. Heck, just a little bear market has everyone eying the windows.
Other than bravery, there are aesthetic aspects to consider. Maybe I could afford to take some maximum SWR each year for life, but I like seeing that my nestegg is over "X dollars" in size.

If I cut back a little during bear markets while still living the good life, and that helps the nestegg recover more quickly, that would make me happy. It might or might not be strictly NECESSARY, but it might be something that makes me happy.

Doesn't mean I'm chicken or about to jump out of a window - - just means that a nice, plump nestegg is a beautiful sight to behold.
__________________
"Already we are boldly launched upon the deep; but soon we shall be lost in its unshored, harborless immensities." - - H. Melville, 1851
W2R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2008, 12:18 PM   #8
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,113
Quote:
Originally Posted by samclem View Post
If you are using the "4% of year end balance" rule, your withdrawals reduce automatically when your portfolio declines. That's one of the nice features of that model--it explicitly accounts for the behavior most of us actually exhibit when things get rough.
That's how I handle getting more conservative when my portfolio shrinks. But I don't have to worry about it until next January and who knows what things might look like then.

Audrey
audreyh1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2008, 12:03 PM   #9
Moderator
W2R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 10,395
I won't be in the withdrawal phase until next year, but naturally have been thinking about this, since it looks like I may be retiring into a bear market at the very least.

With my conservative asset allocation and longevity genes, I am figuring on withdrawing less than 4% even in a good economy. (When I say 4%, or some other percentage, I tend to think in terms of samclem's "4% of the year-end balance" of my portfolio.)

When the economy is not good, my portfolio will be dwindling and I will not like that. So, knowing myself, I am pretty sure that I will withdraw only around 1.5% or less at times such as we have been experiencing recently.

When the economy is healthy and vibrant, or if my portfolio exceeds a certain value even in a crummy economy, I might withdraw as much as 3% - 3.5% if I could think of something to spend it on. I will probably ease into that, though, since that would be substantially more I am used to spending.
__________________
"Already we are boldly launched upon the deep; but soon we shall be lost in its unshored, harborless immensities." - - H. Melville, 1851
W2R is offline   Reply With Quote
The 95% Rule
Old 07-12-2008, 12:17 PM   #10
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 143
In Work Less, Live More, there is the 95% Rule, which says to tighten your belt and take out only 95% of last year's withdrawal in tough times (even if the amount you withdraw exceeds your normal safe withdrawal rate).
rogersteciak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2008, 12:39 PM   #11
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Dawg52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by tangomonster View Post
I was doing less than 4% even before the drop-----
I could cut golf if I had to, but I would stick my head in a gas oven if it comes to that point. My w/d rate is much less than 4%, so I should be able to keep teeing it up.
__________________
Full time wuss............
Dawg52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2008, 12:43 PM   #12
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
ladelfina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,713
gas oven <=> no golf?
ladelfina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2008, 02:12 PM   #13
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
lazygood4nothinbum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,897
my brother & sil are a little upset with me that i'm not on vacation with them right now. but i just can't justify to myself spending any more money than need be when times don't look so good. to make this even more absurd, they were paying for everyone; it wouldn't have cost me a dime.

i find that even with my daily gas use. it's not like an extra thousand bucks a year in gas makes much of a difference. i just don't like the idea of spending so much money when i can do without it.

i may be cheap, but at least i'm not broke.
__________________
"off with their heads"~~dr. joseph-ignace guillotin

"life should begin with age and its privileges and accumulations, and end with youth and its capacity to splendidly enjoy such advantages."~~mark twain - letter to edward kimmitt 1901
lazygood4nothinbum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2008, 08:03 PM   #14
Recycles dryer sheets
Darryl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 462
[quote=lazygood4nothinbum;682266]my brother & sil are a little upset with me that i'm not on vacation with them right now. but i just can't justify to myself spending any more money than need be when times don't look so good. to make this even more absurd, they were paying for everyone; it wouldn't have cost me a dime.

LG4NB, you are holding the reins too tight if you're uncomfortable going on a free family outing.
__________________
Your focus determines your reality - Qui-Gon
Darryl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2008, 08:23 PM   #15
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: north of Kansas City
Posts: 6,188
There is this here psych er logical problem. In my heart I'm a cheap bastard. After 2006's 5% variable and not getting any younger - I'm trying to keep my spending up in the 4-5% of portfolio range but my subconscious is with pssst Wellesley - don't spend more than you are getting in dividends and interest (3 to 3.5%). Note that I own Target 2015 not Wellesley.

My comfort zone seems to be running less than 4% - on paper(IMHO) it should be more and at least it's more than my checked bursts of 'extreme frugal' of the past(early ER in the 90's).

heh heh heh - hormones!, behavioral, what the heck .
unclemick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2008, 02:23 PM   #16
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
FIREdreamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,484
I am not yet retired but this year we have definitely curtailed our spending (5-10% lower than last year) even though our income has increased about 20%. Most of the curbing seems to be done unconsciously because we don't really feel like we are cutting back, but the truth is we must be. Maybe it's just watching the news and feeling all the gloom and doom, I don't know.
FIREdreamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2008, 02:39 PM   #17
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
haha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hooverville
Posts: 10,801
If you are not liquidating stocks, it doesn't matter whether the market is up or down. 4% is either OK, or not OK, a priori to market distress.

What counts is the underlying earning power of your investments.

OTOH, if you want to save money to pour it into stocks at recent prices, then cutting back may be a good idea.

What I find really funny is that for years anyone who suggested on these forums that valuation of stocks mattered in choosing a withdrawal rate was stoned.

Now, it seems like some are indeed closet believers in valuation- although they seem to have applied the principle backwards. After all, valuations are better today than they were when the market was >20% higher, aren't they?

Ha
__________________
Above all, humans are political animals.
Nota bene: I am either a moron or an idiot. So don't pay any attention to anything I say or you are one too. Please consult your financial advisor, astrologer or proctologist for whatever it may be that you are seeking.
haha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2008, 03:48 PM   #18
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Alan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 2,063
Send a message via MSN to Alan
I'm only planning a 2.5% withdrawal, but if I was on a 4% withdrawal plan and my investments lost more than 5% by year end then I would withdraw the same as the year before (no inflation adjustment). More than 10% then I'd be looking at more serious cutbacks in spending.
__________________
Age and treachery will usually overcome youth and ability

Countown clock is at 9 weeks to be SIRE'd
Alan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2008, 04:21 PM   #19
Moderator
ziggy29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 7,253
Quote:
Originally Posted by haha View Post
What I find really funny is that for years anyone who suggested on these forums that valuation of stocks mattered in choosing a withdrawal rate was stoned.

Now, it seems like some are indeed closet believers in valuation- although they seem to have applied the principle backwards. After all, valuations are better today than they were when the market was >20% higher, aren't they?
Great point. It goes to show that the best plans on paper are only good as the emotional resolve to follow them.

The 4% rate was tested to weather the Depression of the 1930s and the low-growth, inflationary 1970s. So if someone believed in 4% on that basis, I would submit that they have to be convincing themselves that this will be worse than BOTH of those events in order to justify dropping the rate if they believed it survived those previous lousy markets. Either that or they are discovering that fear trumps reason.

IMO, it's a perfect example of emotions like greed and fear clouding rational thinking.

If nothing else, the 4% theory is being shown as just another general truism that people abandon in bad and uncertain times -- *exactly* the kind of times that number was created to survive.
__________________
"Hey, for every ten dollars, that's another hour that I have to be in the work place. That's an hour of my life. And my life is a very finite thing. I have only 'x' number of hours left before I'm dead. So how do I want to use these hours of my life? Do I want to use them just spending it on more crap and more stuff, or do I want to start getting a handle on it and using my life more intelligently?" -- Joe Dominguez (1938 - 1997)
ziggy29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Behavioral finance
Old 07-12-2008, 10:46 PM   #20
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 143
Quote:
Originally Posted by ziggy29 View Post
Great point. It goes to show that the best plans on paper are only good as the emotional resolve to follow them.

The 4% rate was tested to weather the Depression of the 1930s and the low-growth, inflationary 1970s. So if someone believed in 4% on that basis, I would submit that they have to be convincing themselves that this will be worse than BOTH of those events in order to justify dropping the rate if they believed it survived those previous lousy markets. Either that or they are discovering that fear trumps reason.

IMO, it's a perfect example of emotions like greed and fear clouding rational thinking.

If nothing else, the 4% theory is being shown as just another general truism that people abandon in bad and uncertain times -- *exactly* the kind of times that number was created to survive.
I agree with this post. The subconscious mind (according to the book Think and Grow Rich) overrides rational thought when one is "losing money" and the emotional response is to sell no matter how low the price (which is otherwise known as "capitulation"). But through autosuggestion and preparation, one can condition one's subconscious mind to behave differently when under fire from a declining market (or under temptation from a rising market).

That is why value investors are taught to stay within their circle of competence and to know what the value is of the fractional ownership interests in the wonderful businesses (i.e., securities) they are buying. They will be able to tell the difference between a "falling knife" and "fallen angel" and have the confidence to react accordingly (i.e., stay away from a falling knife and consider buying more of a fallen angel if appropriate in terms of one's overall portfolio).

Another aspect of one's reaction to market conditions is one's liquidity situation. Money needed within the next five years for living expenses should not be in the stock market because the market can be down for long periods of time. If one needs to cash out investments within the next few weeks or months to pay living expenses and the market is way down, that is extra stress one can do without (i.e., it's easier to sleep well when you don't need to sell any of your securities for another five years when the market is tanking).

All of this takes planning ahead of time. Think through various market scenarios and write down how you would want to react. Everyone thinks they will be able to buy low if the market tanks (because they want to "buy at the bottom") and be able to sell right before the peak of the bubble (because they want to "sell at the top"). This is much easier said than done, but mentally rehearsing one's responses to various scenarios takes some of the emotion out of the situation when the actual situation happens.

Also, think of this market condition as a dress rehearsal for its next occurrence. While every bear market is different, they do have one thing in common -- the ability to cause investors to make serious mistakes that are driven by emotional reactions to financially stessful situations. But you can condition yourself to be Mr. Spock cool (or Mr. Buffett cool) to these kinds of situations and take advantage of them by being on the other side of the transactions of those people who are capitulating due to their emotions.
rogersteciak is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Where does the bank drop off the keys? Walt34 Other topics 1 01-30-2008 01:02 PM
Drop Professional Certification? yakers Life after FIRE 13 07-02-2007 06:39 PM
Should I drop out of this CD? Callie FIRE and Money 8 09-28-2006 01:21 PM
When interest rates drop... blanston FIRE and Money 29 08-11-2006 11:10 AM
Work Until You Drop BunsGettingFirm Other topics 34 09-16-2004 09:10 AM


Other Social Knowledge forum communities:
Cooking Forum - Sailing Forum - Early Retirement - Airstream Trailer - Aquarium Forum - Royal Forum - Book Forum - Volkswagen Touareg Forum - Jeep Wrangler Forum - Whitewater Kayaking & Rafting Forum - Fiberglass RV Forum - RV Forum - Truck Conversion - U2 Music Forum
Investing Channel
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:38 AM.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0