davidbeitz
Dryer sheet wannabe
Are here any advantages to: skipping my 401(k) contribution, keeping the percentage keeping it the same, or increasing it when receiving my bonus check?
Thanks in advance
Thanks in advance
My 401k plan is set up such that once I max out my contributions I automatically stop contributing. That's great, except if I max out and stop contributing for the rest of the year then my employer match becomes zero (50% of $0 is $0 as is 100% of $0). So for me, my primary concern when getting "extra pay" (I get OT, but not bonuses) is to ensure that I adjust my contribution rate such that I max out my contributions as close to the last week of the year as possible in order to get the maximum company match I can.
Knowing he was going to retire mid-year, he accelerated his 401k deductions so as to cop a full year's company match before leaving in July. Maybe how the match gets deposited varies by employer...
Are here any advantages to: skipping my 401(k) contribution, keeping the percentage keeping it the same, or increasing it when receiving my bonus check?
Thanks in advance
Neither my spouse nor I have such specific control over when 401(k) contributions are taken out, and unfortunately they do take out 401(k) contributions for bonuses. For my spouse, that's not a big deal. That happens in February, and raises come in March, so I can adjust future contributions up or down as necessary to account for those changes. Beyond that, my spouse's employer will readjust company matching contributions - if you reach the 401(k) contribution limit before the end of the year, they'll effectively treat some of your earlier, excess contributions as late-in-the-year contributions, and match them after the new year.Are here any advantages to: skipping my 401(k) contribution, keeping the percentage keeping it the same, or increasing it when receiving my bonus check?
Perhaps, but given that they don't do what's necessary to satisfy Safe Harbor, there is reason to suspect intentionally undercutting the benefit, without making it completely obvious that they're doing so.For companies that don't work that way, I doubt that they limit the match as an intentional policy. It's probably just outdated systems and interfaces between company payroll and the plan administrator.
Perhaps, but given that they don't do what's necessary to satisfy Safe Harbor, there is reason to suspect intentionally undercutting the benefit, without making it completely obvious that they're doing so.
That's probably true. I was on a corporate 401(k) committee. It was like pulling teeth to get a "true up" added, but success finally came and was retroactive one year. A little lobbying of the C-level suite was necessary because only a handful of employees contributed to the max level before the last paycheck and were affected. Most of the affected employees had no idea they were getting stiffed.For companies that don't work that way, I doubt that they limit the match as an intentional policy. It's probably just outdated systems and interfaces between company payroll and the plan administrator.
Yes, it does vary by employer.
The company I worked for would not allow front loading the company match, limiting the amount they would contribute each month to 1/12 the maximum your salary would allow.
Because I'm an old person with expectations and employers would prefer to hire kids and H-1Bs, who they can pay peanuts rather than matching my HCE salary.It's a shame your employer treats you in such a horrible manner! With so many other employers who don't use those unsavory tactics, why aren't you moving on down the road to a more favorable situation?
Because I'm an old person with expectations and employers would prefer to hire kids and H-1Bs, who they can pay peanuts rather than matching my HCE salary.
Oh, and did you miss the part where I said I was HCE? The fact that they pay so many kids and H-1Bs so little that they cannot afford to contribute to the 401(k), that's what makes being HCE an issue.
Your situation is 100% of your own making. If you don't like your employer or the way things are, snatch something else. You're not at all stuck where you are. You're there by choice.
I never said anything to the contrary.
Must have. With that comment, I was answering your specific question - nothing more.When you were talking about lower paid H1b visa folks, etc., I must have misinterpreted what you were saying.