MY new employer has a 75% investment match up to 6% of my income. Definitely a nice perk. However, with the catch up clause I could add significantly more money to the 401K and save myself some taxes. The only problem is that the 401K administrator is Principle and the investment choices look pretty tame.
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
MY new employer has a 75% investment match up to 6% of my income. Definitely a nice perk. However, with the catch up clause I could add significantly more money to the 401K and save myself some taxes. The only problem is that the 401K administrator is Principle and the investment choices look pretty tame.
Any thoughts?
if you are asking if you should contribute to your 401k the answer is yes, as much as possible.
Look at the vesting schedule on the match. You are new and if you don't plan to stay long the match might be nothing or little.
Putting 22K a year in a 401K even with good choices means you will have to pay ordinary income tax on withdrawals. That income might make SS taxable and you face penalities if you are under 55 when you leave the employer or 59.5 if you roll to a IRA then withdraw.
If you need the tax reduction now and will be withdrawing without penalty at a lower rate the investment returns don't matter as much. You can contribute then roll into a IRA then convert to ROTH if that works out for you tax wise.
Yes. The tax savings, the match and tax-deferment outweigh all but the most egregious high-fee plans. Those plans have front-end load AND a 3% expense ratio.
"it depends"--but probably not. It would be best to max out any other tax-favored investment opportunities (IRA, Roth IRA, a 529 plan if applicable in your case, HSA, etc) before putting additional money into a bunch of high-cost 401K investments. But definitely go for the full match--free money!
__________________
"Freedom begins when you tell Mrs. Grundy to go fly a kite." - R. Heinlein
It depends on your situation, your income level, tax bracket, expected retirement income level, possible future tax levels, etc. JMO, but if I was elegible for contributing to a Roth, I'd put the extra in that, after putting enough into the 401K to get the full match. If you make too much for the Roth, I'd still put the extra into a taxable IRA and convert it in a year or two to a Roth. I personally can't see how tax levels won't be significantly higher in the future than they are now, so even if you are in a lower bracket you might be paying higher taxes. I prefer to get the government's hand out my pocket up front.
__________________ A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort. DW and I - FIREd at 50 (7/06), living off assets
"it depends"--but probably not. It would be best to max out any other tax-favored investment opportunities (IRA, Roth IRA, a 529 plan if applicable in your case, HSA, etc) before putting additional money into a bunch of high-cost 401K investments. But definitely go for the full match--free money!
i contributed to the other available tax advantaged accounts (ira for me) too
I've had my share of shtty 401ks but there is usually some sort of S&P500 index fund with a reasonable expense ratio that you can use as part of your overall investment strategy.
I can't do the Roth and the traditional does not make extraordinary sense in my case, but if I was under the limits, the above is what I'd want to do.
R
if you contribute to the TIRA now you can convert it to a roth later and you wont have to pay taxes on the amout of the conversion on which you have already paid taxes