Portal Forums Links Register FAQ Community Calendar Log in

Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
A family trust set-up with minors as beneficiaries, owning s-corp shares
Old 08-28-2015, 11:19 AM   #1
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
thefed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,203
A family trust set-up with minors as beneficiaries, owning s-corp shares

I had someone mention in the recent past tell me that it'd be advantageous to set-up a family trust with my minor children as beneficiaries. I don't fully understand what will happen tax-wise, and will be meeting with an accountant soon, but was wondering if anyone here has any input. I partially want to do this so I no longer qualify as self-employed when it comes to FHA underwriting guidelines (aka abig PITA)

Below is a summary of my questions off the top of my head.

  • If my minor kids are the beneficiaries of the trust, how do taxes work at the end of the year? Now, all profits from my s-corp (i own 100%) pass through to my personal tax return...what about when I'm not a shareholder?
  • On that note, would it appear that my 4 year old has an income of $xx,xxxx?? He pays taxes on it?
  • Can you explain the dynamic between my kids (the benficiaries paying taxes with the income) and me (their guardian, and the settlor?, and a trustee?) and their mother (also a legal guardian). Very importantly, I dont want her having any way to get to their shares/income...how do we assure that?
  • If I were to set this up, and my kids are the beneficiaries - I wouldnt be able to show/prove any of the company's income other than what I pay myself and show on my w-2's....right?


I'm just trying to wrap my head around this to determine if it makes sense. I think I might be able to pay this house off in the coming year and want to set myself up (on paper) to more easily qualify for a home loan. It was a major PITA recently when I applied for a home loan because they consider you self-employed if you own more than 25% of a company.

Obviously, further shielding assets in this high-risk biz is a plus as well.
thefed is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 08-28-2015, 11:44 AM   #2
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,242
Cannot answer all your questions.... but will throw out a few answers as best I know...

If you get rid of your shares, you no longer will get a K-1 from the S corp and will not have it on your tax return...

However, you need to check if the trust you plan can even own the S corp... usually a trust cannot own shares, but there is an exception... I just do not think that exception includes multiple beneficiaries... so if you have more than one kid, you might have to do multiple trusts....



http://www.americanbar.org/content/d...thcheckdam.pdf



Edit to add from the link...

If a trust that holds S stock does not meet all the applicable S corporation trust rules, not only will the trust be ineligible to hold S stock but the corporation's S election will terminate. Unfortunately, missteps are easily made, and inadvertent terminations and invalid elections frequently occur. Although there is no substitute for knowledgeable and careful advisors who know how to navigate the Subchapter S rules, there is some comfort in existing tax policy that permits inadvertent terminations of the S election or invalid elections to be corrected if certain conditions are met.
Texas Proud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2015, 12:33 PM   #3
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 2,511
I know less than Texas....

I would assume to do this would require an irrevocable trust, so get it right the first time. Otherwise I think you still pay taxes.
If the kids are getting paid through the trust and having income above some nominal amount, their taxes will fall back into the parent's rate via the kiddie tax rules. I believe can extend beyond being minors.
If the monies are now the kids, not yours. It is not there for you to "spend as you wish". Similar to UGM, there are rules as to how the money can be used by the parent or guardian.

So when your kids are grown...is this trust going to keep paying them?
bingybear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2015, 03:39 PM   #4
Full time employment: Posting here.
ESRwannabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 889
I've done a little bit of research into asset protection and from what I understand the best thing I could do is a "Wyoming Close LLC".

I'm single and I'm not looking into inheritance taxes, irrevocable trusts and that type of thing. I was just looking for ways I can possibly protect myself.

I have an umbrella policy on insurance and that's it right now.
ESRwannabe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2015, 08:10 AM   #5
Dryer sheet aficionado
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Warminster
Posts: 40
Definitely talk to your CPA. I am a CPA, but since I don't know all of the facts as they relate to you, take this with a grain of salt.

Unless the Trust is a Qualified Subchapter S trust, you will lose your S status of your corporation. Also, because the kids are not active in the corporation, their income will be considered passive and may be subject to the kiddie tax. Also, any losses that the corporation may incur will be disallowed because of the passive activity limitations rules. On top of all that, you may gift tax implication on the transfer of the stock. Long story short, you may not accomplish what you think you want to accomplish.
Jimbo125 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Investments for minors growerVon Young Dreamers 14 05-07-2016 06:01 AM
Canadian Royalty Trust changing to Corp. sailfish Active Investing, Market Strategies & Alternative Assets 4 12-13-2010 01:23 PM
Will/trust disbursement wrt TODs/beneficiaries RunningBum FIRE and Money 3 01-12-2010 12:17 AM
I-Shares and Power Shares vs Vanguard ETF Hydroman FIRE and Money 6 05-23-2007 08:37 AM
I-Shares and Power Shares vs Vanguard ETF Hydroman Life after FIRE 0 05-22-2007 09:21 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:14 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.