Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Additional Cost of Choosing Joint Life Pension Income
Old 05-02-2014, 02:55 PM   #1
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
RetireAge50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,659
Additional Cost of Choosing Joint Life Pension Income

Pensions and annuities typically have options for single life, joint life 50%, joint life 75%, and joint life 100%.
In our circumstance we will likely choose one of the joint life options.
This can be achieved in one of two ways:
1. Through the pension provider by selecting the joint life option
2. Choose single life through pension provider and then buying a term insurance policy from another provider.
In my brief research I have found that option 2 is about half the cost of option 1. Am I over thinking this? What have others here done? Other ideas?
RetireAge50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 05-02-2014, 03:01 PM   #2
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,204
I've wondered about this as well and will face the question in 2-7 years depending on when I take my pension. Can a 60-65 year old male get 20 or 30 year term life insurance?

The other thing I see is that the need declines from when you pension starts to when you die since there are less remaining years to provide for DW but if I buy enough coverage to fill the need at age 60 then I am progressively "overinsured" as time goes by.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2014, 03:11 PM   #3
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Mulligan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9,343
Being single, I had the no brainer of option 1, but other friends of mine will have to struggle with this choice. I would only offer a few thoughts on matter. 1) Is pension COLA'd? If so the reduced pension payout will widen over time due to lower original pension 2) Is survivor good at handling money and drawing assets to live on, as opposed to preference to receiving a monthly check? 3) Will the term life policy and accumulated assets provide enough security if you dropped dead in a couple of years? 4) Have you compared the "spread" between reduced pension from monthly insurance premium?
One friend of mine retiring soon is leaning towards 1/2 to 3/4 joint. Although she has a pension it is substantially less than his. They will go option 1 on hers as he says if she dies his monthly costs will go down more than her pension would bring in. I have another idiot friend who is 10 years away from retiring thinks he can get his wife to sign off on option 1 to have more money even though she has no pension or SS. He thinks she can find another husband. That plan isn't going to fly with her, no way.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Mulligan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2014, 03:11 PM   #4
Moderator Emeritus
aja8888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 18,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by pb4uski View Post
I've wondered about this as well and will face the question in 2-7 years depending on when I take my pension. Can a 60-65 year old male get 20 or 30 year term life insurance?

The other thing I see is that the need declines from when you pension starts to when you die since there are less remaining years to provide for DW but if I buy enough coverage to fill the need at age 60 then I am progressively "overinsured" as time goes by.
We bought two $250K 10 year renewable term life policies (DW and I) when we turned 65 since we have no pensions and only SS and savings. Our families have a early death history.
aja8888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2014, 03:11 PM   #5
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,366
Only DW is getting a pension. She's 5 years younger, and of course female, so she should outlive me. She's the non-financial one, so more for her would be good. I could do without the pension just fine. So we're expecting to take the single life option.
Animorph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2014, 03:15 PM   #6
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by aja8888 View Post
We bought two $250K 10 year renewable term life policies (DW and I) when we turned 65 since we have no pensions and only SS and savings. Our families have a early death history.
I'm just wondering what happens if you still need the coverage at age 75 or 85 - though if you can reduce the coverage to approximate the reduction in need then it might help mitigate increase in premiums due to age.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2014, 03:16 PM   #7
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Mulligan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by pb4uski View Post
I've wondered about this as well and will face the question in 2-7 years depending on when I take my pension. Can a 60-65 year old male get 20 or 30 year term life insurance?

The other thing I see is that the need declines from when you pension starts to when you die since there are less remaining years to provide for DW but if I buy enough coverage to fill the need at age 60 then I am progressively "overinsured" as time goes by.

I looking at needing term life at 65 for about 5 years, so I hope it isn't too costly for $150,000 or so. I want to get my GF out of work while I still know my name. We would just live off my pension while her 401k can still accrue a bit and delay her SS until 70. If I croaked right after she quit her job, she would be screwed.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Mulligan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2014, 03:50 PM   #8
Moderator
Walt34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Eastern WV Panhandle
Posts: 25,290
DW doesn't have a pension so for me it was a no-brainer to take the spousal benefit option. The pension is COLA'd, I retired at 52 so going that far out, especially remembering the inflation of the '70s & '80s, I didn't even consider insurance.

But I am holding off on SS until at least 65, probably 66, and perhaps even later to reduce the financial impact on her assuming I go first because the pension drops 30% then. That way the net decrease will be a lot less. If I go sooner there's enough in savings/investments to more than make up the difference until she's 66.
__________________
When I was a kid I wanted to be older. This is not what I expected.
Walt34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2014, 03:51 PM   #9
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
RetireAge50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,659
Inflation roughly takes care of the "overinsured" as time passes part. The future payout will be worth much less in real dollars.
RetireAge50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2014, 03:59 PM   #10
Administrator
Alan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N. Yorkshire
Posts: 34,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by RetireAge50 View Post
Pensions and annuities typically have options for single life, joint life 50%, joint life 75%, and joint life 100%.
In our circumstance we will likely choose one of the joint life options.
This can be achieved in one of two ways:
1. Through the pension provider by selecting the joint life option
2. Choose single life through pension provider and then buying a term insurance policy from another provider.
In my brief research I have found that option 2 is about half the cost of option 1. Am I over thinking this? What have others here done? Other ideas?
I went with 50% spouse coverage and took out life insurance to cover the other 50%. Since the pension is not COLA'ed the need for the insurance fades over time. (DW does not have any pensions of her own)
__________________
Retired in Jan, 2010 at 55, moved to England in May 2016
Enough private pension and SS income to cover all needs
Alan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2014, 05:13 PM   #11
Gone but not forgotten
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sarasota,fl.
Posts: 11,447
I would also see if the pension is tied to health benefits .I was widowed at 51 so health benefits were an important factor in the decision.
Moemg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2014, 05:40 PM   #12
Recycles dryer sheets
Kaufmanrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Forney
Posts: 120
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moemg View Post
I would also see if the pension is tied to health benefits .I was widowed at 51 so health benefits were an important factor in the decision.
As a retired FED, the only way I could ensure my wife would remain eligible for the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program was to select a survivor benefit. We opted for the max which will give her 50% of my retirement check and she could stay in the health care system. I gave up 10% of my retirement each month to purchase this option. I retired young at 49 and she is 47. I purchased a 250,000 dollar Life Insurance Policy to make up the half of my income she would lose. It'll end when we become Social Security eligible.

The flip side, if she dies before I do the government will stop taking the 10% out and my check gets bigger. Told my wife she better keep me happy.
Kaufmanrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2014, 05:45 PM   #13
Moderator
Walt34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Eastern WV Panhandle
Posts: 25,290
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaufmanrider View Post
The flip side, if she dies before I do the government will stop taking the 10% out and my check gets bigger. Told my wife she better keep me happy.
Same thing here. The hit on the pension for DW's benefit goes almost entirely away if she goes first.

But she's cute and frankly I'll probably live longer, and definitely happier, if she's still around.
__________________
When I was a kid I wanted to be older. This is not what I expected.
Walt34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2014, 06:40 PM   #14
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 459
Quote:
Originally Posted by RetireAge50 View Post
Pensions and annuities typically have options for single life, joint life 50%, joint life 75%, and joint life 100%.
In our circumstance we will likely choose one of the joint life options.
This can be achieved in one of two ways:
1. Through the pension provider by selecting the joint life option
2. Choose single life through pension provider and then buying a term insurance policy from another provider.
In my brief research I have found that option 2 is about half the cost of option 1. Am I over thinking this? What have others here done? Other ideas?
Just had the similar discussion for a friend who and his wife both will get pension when they retire. Husband is seven years older than wife. They were leaning for 50% surviver benefits for each of their pension. I told them to go for full for each and enjoy the double payment while they're together. Just buy a term life to compensate for loss. We looked in online calculator and 1 million for 20 years was around 900/month. If you buy term around 55 then some providers offer 30 years policy but you try to buy around 60 then max you get for term is 20 years.
retire2020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2014, 07:44 PM   #15
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Laurel, MD
Posts: 8,304
Our cost for 65% survivor benefit is 5%. I always thought it was a pretty good deal, but I never actually verified it. I would prefer 75% coverage but not sure if we have that option. If we play the odds, 65% on my pension and 0 on DW's would probably work the best.
__________________
...with no reasonable expectation for ER, I'm just here auditing the AP class.Retired 8/1/15.
jazz4cash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2014, 08:42 PM   #16
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,629
Quote:
Originally Posted by RetireAge50 View Post
In my brief research I have found that option 2 is about half the cost of option 1. Am I over thinking this? What have others here done? Other ideas?
My employer continued group life insurance (in a reduced amount) for retirees. That is part of the reason I went with the 50% to survivor.

The other is that my wife is convinced that she is the thrifty one in the family and she could live on less than me.

If the life insurer used the same mortality table as the retirement fund, I think the insurance would be more expensive. But the retirement fund uses average mortality, and the life insurance will give you credit for significantly-better-than-average mortality (if you qualify). I expect that's what's driving your result.
Independent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2014, 10:13 AM   #17
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Chuckanut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: West of the Mississippi
Posts: 17,134
Interesting discussion. One thing I did was check to see what happens if my marital status changes after I start taking my pension. I can flip between the various options with some limitations on waiting time and frequency.
__________________
Comparison is the thief of joy

The worst decisions are usually made in times of anger and impatience.
Chuckanut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2014, 11:10 AM   #18
Dryer sheet wannabe
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 14
I am going with the 50% option. The cost is 10.2%. At 100% it is 18.5%. It is non cola but with a "pop up" feature in the event if DW goes first, the pension will revert to the single annuity payout. We have plenty of funds to cover expenses so I can delay SS till 70. That would in effect self insure her from there on out. I have researched the pension max concept as the the insurance industry calls it and it seems to work only in about 20% of cases. I am ineligible to even think about it because some bad habits presently in the off stage (hopefully for good)but I would get a thorough analysis done by a third part (no connections with the ins industry if at all possible) because your choice is most likely irrevocable. Just too many hoops to jump through and risks associated with the concept plus DW would never sign on the dotted line.
jd0850 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2014, 11:58 AM   #19
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
kcowan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pacific latitude 20/49
Posts: 7,677
Send a message via Skype™ to kcowan
What we did was chose the 100% option. This provided term insurance for the years the DW would outlive me. At the time (age 49), that was 4 years. It was pretty cheap. Now after 22 years of collecting the pension, I don't know anymore. I suspect it was cheap because they were using actuarial tables for Megacorp and the retirees worked until 65 and died rather soon after that.

We are hoping to get those actuaries fired by living another 15 years! But we will only win if she outlives me by more than 4 years!
__________________
For the fun of it...Keith
kcowan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2014, 12:12 PM   #20
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
mickeyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: South Texas~29N/98W Just West of Woman Hollering Creek
Posts: 6,668
Quote:
Choose single life through pension provider and then buying a term insurance policy from another provider.



I chose #1. Don't want DW to have any surprises when I predecease her.

#2 (above) assumes that you know how long the correct term of the LI policy will be (don't die after term). Will LI company still be in business at time of death? Don't let policy accidently lapse.
__________________
Part-Owner of Texas

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. Groucho Marx

In dire need of: faster horses, younger woman, older whiskey, more money.
mickeyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Buying additional pension credits? Chuckanut FIRE and Money 26 09-18-2012 03:06 PM
Joint & Survivor Pension versus Term Life bob boag FIRE and Money 5 10-23-2010 03:26 PM
Choosing form of pension- Husband/Wife bizlady FIRE and Money 34 01-01-2010 11:33 AM
72T question about additional income testtubes FIRE and Money 3 01-31-2007 04:41 PM
Help on finding a part-time job making additional income xmanz3 Other topics 14 06-28-2006 12:05 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:44 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.