Quote:
Originally Posted by Spanky
|
I think you picked a good example of the articles documenting so-called money-laundering through Bitcoin.
The article is a fluff piece written by some legal group (HG.org) likely trying to leverage the popularity of Bitcoin into getting some web hits.
There's nothing particularly inaccurate about the article, but it is purely hypothetical.
Also, the exchanges that let you convert USD to/from Bitcoin that I've found comply with KYC (Know your customer) rules - i.e., you have to document your identity.
A big drawback for money-launderers is that Bitcoin's ledger lives forever. That means that if an address is ever linked to you, the trail can be followed all the way to its sources regardless of when the transactions were done.
This makes it an extremely risky to use Bitcoin for money laundering because you have to take into account not only the risk of current disclosure, but also the risk of future disclosure.
Beyond that, the article also makes a hand-waving argument that you can: "simply [convert] it to fiat currency out of the country where the transaction will not be noted by the government" - This may be true for small quantities - but I suspect the liquidity isn't there for any significant fiat laundering (after all, the funds that you're receiving for your Bitcoin have to be clean, too).
I think Bitcoin's current value is far greater as a gambling instrument than as a money laundering instrument.