Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Alternative to Vanguard GNMA?
Old 12-11-2011, 10:38 AM   #1
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Chuckanut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: West of the Mississippi
Posts: 6,318
Alternative to Vanguard GNMA?

Can anybody suggest an alternative fund to Vanguard GNMA? It must have a low expense ratio and yields about the same as the Vanguard fund. Thank you.
__________________

__________________
The worst decisions are usually made in times of anger and impatience.
Chuckanut is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 12-11-2011, 10:47 AM   #2
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
REWahoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 42,074
Do you have some concerns about Vanguard GNMA?
__________________

__________________
Numbers is hard

When I hit 70, it hit back

Retired in 2005 at age 58, no pension
REWahoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2011, 10:50 AM   #3
Moderator Emeritus
Bestwifeever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16,372
I did a google search on "GNMA index fund"--try that, you'll get a lot of options. I would assume they all behave the same re performance, as they're indexes--expenses might vary.
__________________
“Would you like an adventure now, or would you like to have your tea first?” J.M. Barrie, Peter Pan
Bestwifeever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2011, 11:01 AM   #4
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Chuckanut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: West of the Mississippi
Posts: 6,318
Quote:
Originally Posted by REWahoo View Post
Do you have some concerns about Vanguard GNMA?
No, but I have a situation where that fund is not an option.
__________________
The worst decisions are usually made in times of anger and impatience.
Chuckanut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2011, 11:58 AM   #5
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,862
FGMNX is what I use at Fidelity, but if you're not there it may be no more accessible than Vanguard. Looks like a toss-up performance wise, though the ER is higher.
__________________
Animorph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2011, 04:16 PM   #6
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
braumeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Northern Kentucky
Posts: 8,585
I have both the Vanguard and Fidelity GNMA funds, in different accounts, and I'm happy with both of them.
__________________
Pas de lieu Rhône que nous.
braumeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2011, 05:01 PM   #7
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Chuckanut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: West of the Mississippi
Posts: 6,318
Swedroe seems to think that an intermediate treasury fund makes more sense and will do better in the long run than a similar GNMA fund. Any thoughts?
__________________
The worst decisions are usually made in times of anger and impatience.
Chuckanut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2011, 05:08 PM   #8
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
braumeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Northern Kentucky
Posts: 8,585
As long as interest rates stay low, GNMA is an excellent place to keep your money, IMHO.
When rates start rising again, there may be better places to invest, but for the time being, GNMA is just fine.
__________________
Pas de lieu Rhône que nous.
braumeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2011, 05:49 PM   #9
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 721
I think Payden GNMA is a reasonable cost alternative if you're at Schwab if Vanguard and Fidelity aren't an option.
__________________
panacea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2011, 09:13 PM   #10
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
veremchuka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: irradiated - too close to the nuclear furnace
Posts: 1,294
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuckanut View Post
Swedroe seems to think that an intermediate treasury fund makes more sense and will do better in the long run than a similar GNMA fund. Any thoughts?
Yes, GNMA is really not a good bond holding. I have held Admiral shares since retiring and loved GNMA but I have read a lot about them and they really have a lot of risk that has not shown up, wait until mortgage rates start to rise. Many people much smarter than I am think that Intermediate Term treasuries is a much better fund. Let's see why.

GNMA Fund Admiral Shares Year-to-Date return as of 12/09/2011 7.42%
Inter-Term Treasury Adm Year-to-Date return as of 12/09/2011 9.21%
That's quite a difference for 11 months and it's capital appreciation from the rush to quality.
If you go to the Vanguard site and chart GNMA vs ITT for the 1, 3, 5 and 10 year time periods some of the time GNMA did better, some of the time ITT did better.

Knowing what I know today, in September 2007 I'd have put my rollover IRA into ITT not GNMA. I bought my GNMA at a pretty good price, $10.16 to $10.20 and I suspect that at the time the ITT nav was also pretty low.

GNMA fund really does not have a known duration, the ITT fund does. GNMA also suffers from extension risk where people won't refi when rates go up but do when rates go down so you are losing income from lower rates in GNMA than had you been in ITT.

There have been a lot of these discussions at the BH site.

I now think that ITT and TIPS are a better mix than GNMA. The nav on all bond funds is quite high today and I am loathe to pay top dollar for a fund that will have capital depreciation when rates do go up especially when they have durations of 6 and 9 years! At that time I'll exchange my GNMA for a Short Term Treasury and hope rates go up and don't stagnate, the best time to buy a bond fund is when the interest rates are high since the nav will be low. But market timing the bond market is no easier than the equity market.
__________________

__________________
veremchuka is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Schwab vs. Fidelity vs. Vanguard panacea FIRE and Money 21 10-04-2011 09:46 PM
New! From Vanguard! Ed_The_Gypsy FIRE and Money 20 09-23-2011 04:15 PM
Vanguard actively managing index funds. clifp FIRE and Money 11 08-26-2011 03:13 PM
Simple Vanguard Portfolio Senin FIRE and Money 25 08-21-2011 05:04 PM
Can I switch my money to Vanguard? nuisance FIRE and Money 6 08-10-2011 09:57 PM

 

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:27 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.