38Chevy454
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Requesting some help from you all. A long-time ago employer has sent me an offer. No big money involved, and it is kind of in the noise for general budget to be honest. Trying to balance all of the variables and figure out what option to take. Here are the numbers:
1) Lump Sum = $33K, payable by Dec 1 this year.
2) Early Pension Option = $162/month, payments also starting Dec 1 this year. Equivalent to about 5.9% of lump sum annually.
3) Std Pension = $323/month, payments starting Dec 1 six years from now (close enough, technically when I turn 60, my birthday is in Dec). Equivalent to 11.8% of lump sum annually.
The pensions do have surviving spouse 50% as included, or 75% spouse option.
If I do the time value of money calculation and use 6% return as my value (being conservative, as I would likely invest 100% equities), this is what I get for age 66 (12 years from now, I will be 54 in Dec):
1) Lump Sum, compounding monthly for 12 years = $67.5K
2) Early Pension, $162/month for 12 years = $34K
3) Std Pension, $323/month for 6 years = $27.9K
The same values for age 72 (18 years from now) and 6% return:
1) Lump Sum, compounding monthly for 18 years = $96.7K
2) Early Pension, $162/month for 18 years = $62.7K
3) Std Pension, $323/month for 12 years = $67.8K
So it seems that the lump sum is the better choice? My main concern is did I make an error in my calculations or assumptions? I am also not too excited about the lump sum being paid this year, as it will get the full tax rate consequence 25% rate since I worked good portion of this year; just retired approx 1 month ago. I can roll the lump sum into a pre-tax IRA, but am already going to be pressed to avoid RMD's tax rates at the higher values. So not sure if this would help vs just pay the tax this year and have the cash to invest. Having just moved and building a new house and detached garage, I will be spending more this year and next than subsequent years.
I appreciate your thoughts and opinions to help me decide.
1) Lump Sum = $33K, payable by Dec 1 this year.
2) Early Pension Option = $162/month, payments also starting Dec 1 this year. Equivalent to about 5.9% of lump sum annually.
3) Std Pension = $323/month, payments starting Dec 1 six years from now (close enough, technically when I turn 60, my birthday is in Dec). Equivalent to 11.8% of lump sum annually.
The pensions do have surviving spouse 50% as included, or 75% spouse option.
If I do the time value of money calculation and use 6% return as my value (being conservative, as I would likely invest 100% equities), this is what I get for age 66 (12 years from now, I will be 54 in Dec):
1) Lump Sum, compounding monthly for 12 years = $67.5K
2) Early Pension, $162/month for 12 years = $34K
3) Std Pension, $323/month for 6 years = $27.9K
The same values for age 72 (18 years from now) and 6% return:
1) Lump Sum, compounding monthly for 18 years = $96.7K
2) Early Pension, $162/month for 18 years = $62.7K
3) Std Pension, $323/month for 12 years = $67.8K
So it seems that the lump sum is the better choice? My main concern is did I make an error in my calculations or assumptions? I am also not too excited about the lump sum being paid this year, as it will get the full tax rate consequence 25% rate since I worked good portion of this year; just retired approx 1 month ago. I can roll the lump sum into a pre-tax IRA, but am already going to be pressed to avoid RMD's tax rates at the higher values. So not sure if this would help vs just pay the tax this year and have the cash to invest. Having just moved and building a new house and detached garage, I will be spending more this year and next than subsequent years.
I appreciate your thoughts and opinions to help me decide.