Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Anthem huge rate hike
Old 02-08-2010, 11:26 PM   #1
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
free4now's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,228
Anthem huge rate hike

My Anthem individual health insurance just rose 33%. According to this article, my hike was less than average.

Anthem Blue Cross raises premiums
free4now is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 02-09-2010, 07:48 AM   #2
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: VA
Posts: 923
I posted before about Maine telling Anthem to shove it when they asked for a rate increase in that state. Maine determined that since Anthem was making so much money in other states, they didn't need to make a profit in Maine anymore. Guess who gets to subsidize those profits in other states? You.

On that note, Anthem is still the lowest priced carrier even after the rate increase for most demographics in California....but the news doesn't tell you that.
dgoldenz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2010, 11:12 AM   #3
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
tryan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,594
free4now - when was the last increase?

We're Anthem in NH ... rates have been increasing 10-12% per year.
__________________
FIRE'd since 2005
tryan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2010, 04:58 PM   #4
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,764
Seems to me there is basically nothing protecting the individual health care consumer. Eventually this ride is going to end.
Notmuchlonger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2010, 04:09 AM   #5
Full time employment: Posting here.
shotgunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 534
I have wondered if large increases to health insurance and possibly a rapid increase in doctor and hospital charges this year were a response to the ongoing legislative attempts in '09. Is this an industry response i.e. get while they can before a possible change limits future profits?
__________________
Never surrender what you really want for what you want right now.
shotgunner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2010, 08:59 AM   #6
Moderator Emeritus
Martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: minnesota
Posts: 13,228
I posted this in another thread, but what I read is that the Anthem rate hikes may be in large part due to adverse selection. A number of healthy people have dropped their individual insurance during this recession. The unhealthy people are less likely to take that risk. A couple of links that discuss the issue: Sticker Shock | The New Republic Center for Business and Public Policy » Blog Archive » Adverse Selection — California Style
__________________
.


No more lawyer stuff, no more political stuff, so no more CYA

Martha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2010, 09:03 AM   #7
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
ziggy29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Oregon Coast
Posts: 16,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martha View Post
I posted this in another thread, but what I read is that the Anthem rate hikes may be in large part due to adverse selection. A number of healthy people have dropped their individual insurance during this recession. The unhealthy people are less likely to take that risk. A couple of links that discuss the issue: Sticker Shock | The New Republic Center for Business and Public Policy » Blog Archive » Adverse Selection — California Style
That would make some sense. Many Megacorp group plans are also going up by double digits, but because they (a) tend to be highly subsidized and (b) are used by people who are employed (or in some cases retired), you won't see as many healthy people dropping out of them. And their rate increases are (overall) much less than I'm hearing from individual plans.

More evidence of a broken system, methinks.
__________________
"Hey, for every ten dollars, that's another hour that I have to be in the work place. That's an hour of my life. And my life is a very finite thing. I have only 'x' number of hours left before I'm dead. So how do I want to use these hours of my life? Do I want to use them just spending it on more crap and more stuff, or do I want to start getting a handle on it and using my life more intelligently?" -- Joe Dominguez (1938 - 1997)
ziggy29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2010, 09:08 AM   #8
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
TromboneAl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,880
Quote:
My Anthem individual health insurance just rose 33%.
It's in part because you turn 40 this year, right? DW's also went up by a similar amount (she turns 55):

http://www.early-retirement.org/foru...6-a-48458.html
__________________
Al
TromboneAl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2010, 11:25 AM   #9
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: VA
Posts: 923
Quote:
Originally Posted by ziggy29 View Post
That would make some sense. Many Megacorp group plans are also going up by double digits, but because they (a) tend to be highly subsidized and (b) are used by people who are employed (or in some cases retired), you won't see as many healthy people dropping out of them. And their rate increases are (overall) much less than I'm hearing from individual plans.

More evidence of a broken system, methinks.
Individual policies are usually a fraction of the price of group policies, most people just don't know it.
dgoldenz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2010, 11:29 AM   #10
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
ziggy29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Oregon Coast
Posts: 16,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by dgoldenz View Post
Individual policies are usually a fraction of the price of group policies, most people just don't know it.
Yes, IF you are healthy AND you are relatively young AND your employer (or former employer for those lucky few who have employer-subsidized retiree health insurance) isn't paying for most of your group benefit.

The bottom line is that most of us would not be well-served to opt out of our employer-subsidized group plans and into our own individual plan. And that's one of the facts that grossly distorts and fractures the individual health insurance market, making it much more dysfunctional than it would probably be if there was no link between health insurance and employment.
__________________
"Hey, for every ten dollars, that's another hour that I have to be in the work place. That's an hour of my life. And my life is a very finite thing. I have only 'x' number of hours left before I'm dead. So how do I want to use these hours of my life? Do I want to use them just spending it on more crap and more stuff, or do I want to start getting a handle on it and using my life more intelligently?" -- Joe Dominguez (1938 - 1997)
ziggy29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2010, 12:02 PM   #11
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: VA
Posts: 923
Quote:
Originally Posted by ziggy29 View Post
Yes, IF you are healthy AND you are relatively young AND your employer (or former employer for those lucky few who have employer-subsidized retiree health insurance) isn't paying for most of your group benefit.

The bottom line is that most of us would not be well-served to opt out of our employer-subsidized group plans and into our own individual plan. And that's one of the facts that grossly distorts and fractures the individual health insurance market, making it much more dysfunctional than it would probably be if there was no link between health insurance and employment.
I understand that, but that doesn't mean there's any less money going to the insurance company under a group plan. Having insurance tied to employment is probably one of the worst ideas anyone ever came up with. Why isn't life insurance, long term care, car insurance, homeowners insurance, etc tied to employment with the employer subsidizing cost too? Makes no sense.
dgoldenz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2010, 12:06 PM   #12
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
ziggy29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Oregon Coast
Posts: 16,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by dgoldenz View Post
I understand that, but that doesn't mean there's any less money going to the insurance company under a group plan. Having insurance tied to employment is probably one of the worst ideas anyone ever came up with. Why isn't life insurance, long term care, car insurance, homeowners insurance, etc tied to employment with the employer subsidizing cost too? Makes no sense.
I agree, but it is what it is, and when you offset the cost of my share of the premiums with the $1000 annual contribution my employer puts in my HSA, the "cost" of the insurance itself comes to about $15 per month for both my wife and me.

I'm not going to turn it down just because I think the employer-based health insurance model is stupid and possibly a significant part of the cost containment problem. It's not like my employer is going to pay me an extra $650 a month to decline coverage or put the $1000 HSA match into my 401K instead.
__________________
"Hey, for every ten dollars, that's another hour that I have to be in the work place. That's an hour of my life. And my life is a very finite thing. I have only 'x' number of hours left before I'm dead. So how do I want to use these hours of my life? Do I want to use them just spending it on more crap and more stuff, or do I want to start getting a handle on it and using my life more intelligently?" -- Joe Dominguez (1938 - 1997)
ziggy29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2010, 12:09 PM   #13
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: VA
Posts: 923
Quote:
Originally Posted by ziggy29 View Post
I agree, but it is what it is, and when you offset the cost of my share of the premiums with the $1000 annual contribution my employer puts in my HSA, the "cost" of the insurance itself comes to about $15 per month for both my wife and me.

I'm not going to turn it down just because I think the employer-based health insurance model is stupid and possibly a significant part of the cost containment problem. It's not like my employer is going to pay me an extra $650 a month to decline coverage or put the $1000 HSA match into my 401K instead.
And that's exactly the problem. Everyone complains about how expensive health insurance is, yet nobody wants to give up their gold-plated benefit plan that they pay little to nothing for (at least in comparison to the total cost), which results in the highest amount of claims, and further drives up premium increases.
dgoldenz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2010, 12:13 PM   #14
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
ziggy29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Oregon Coast
Posts: 16,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by dgoldenz View Post
And that's exactly the problem. Everyone complains about how expensive health insurance is, yet nobody wants to give up their gold-plated benefit plan that they pay little to nothing for (at least in comparison to the total cost), which results in the highest amount of claims, and further drives up premium increases.
Tragedy of the commons.
__________________
"Hey, for every ten dollars, that's another hour that I have to be in the work place. That's an hour of my life. And my life is a very finite thing. I have only 'x' number of hours left before I'm dead. So how do I want to use these hours of my life? Do I want to use them just spending it on more crap and more stuff, or do I want to start getting a handle on it and using my life more intelligently?" -- Joe Dominguez (1938 - 1997)
ziggy29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2010, 03:37 PM   #15
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
REWahoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,003
After an audit of the numbers behind their proposed huge California rate increase:

Oops: Health insurer nixes big premium hike, cites bad math


Quote:
LOS ANGELES (AP) — Insurance giant Anthem Blue Cross withdrew plans to raise health insurance rates for Californians by as much as 39% after an independent audit determined the company's justification for raising premiums was based on flawed data, state Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner said Thursday.

Anthem said separately it will file a new application for a rate increase with the California Department of Insurance and the Department of Managed Health Care, perhaps as early as next month. It added that any errors in its original application were inadvertent.
Anyone care to wager the new increase will be "only" 15%? Desensitized the same way we were when gas went down from $4+ per gallon...
__________________
Numbers is hard
REWahoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2010, 12:22 AM   #16
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
free4now's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,228
Bad math, yeah right. That's what bugs me so much about the insurance companies is they never admit when they are wrong. I had a half dozen or so incidences where my insurance company granted my grievances, but every time they explained it as "we didn't make any mistake but as a one time accomodation we're paying what you say we owe".
free4now is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2010, 06:18 AM   #17
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
wildcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lou-evil
Posts: 2,025
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martha View Post
I posted this in another thread, but what I read is that the Anthem rate hikes may be in large part due to adverse selection. A number of healthy people have dropped their individual insurance during this recession. The unhealthy people are less likely to take that risk. A couple of links that discuss the issue: Sticker Shock | The New Republic Center for Business and Public Policy » Blog Archive » Adverse Selection — California Style

Martha is correct. Anthem individual markets lost money last year in the CA markets due the recession as pointed out (CA was really whacked). The price increases we are seeing now are an attempt to reflect what the pool is now, not what it was in good times. Govt already monitors the health insurance industry very closely so to me it's hard to imagine a company making high margins on policies.

This part I understand and accept b/c that is how insurance works. The part I don't understand and don't accept is corporate waste which is a factor in pricing policies. Just about any big company has a lot of waste, unfortunately in this case the waste is really felt by many people.
__________________
"These walls are kind of funny. First you hate 'em, then you get used to 'em. Enough time passes, gets so you depend on them"
wildcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2010, 06:22 AM   #18
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,072
Quote:
Originally Posted by REWahoo View Post
After an audit of the numbers behind their proposed huge California rate increase:

Oops: Health insurer nixes big premium hike, cites bad math


Anyone care to wager the new increase will be "only" 15%? Desensitized the same way we were when gas went down from $4+ per gallon...

Yes those actuaries are often poor at math. That is why the insurance companies retain legions of them.


If the increase would have been accepted do you think the insurance company would have later refunded the money when they discovered their "Error"?
chinaco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2010, 08:50 PM   #19
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: VA
Posts: 923
By "inadvertent calculation mistakes" they really mean "bowing to political and public pressure." Anthem's rates increased in Virginia 25-35% across the board last year. Why is there no media outrage over here? Gimme a break...
dgoldenz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2010, 04:38 PM   #20
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,072
Quote:
Originally Posted by dgoldenz View Post
By "inadvertent calculation mistakes" they really mean "bowing to political and public pressure." Anthem's rates increased in Virginia 25-35% across the board last year. Why is there no media outrage over here? Gimme a break...
You said the reason in your post... Political pressure! In the case of VA, the lack of it.

You might ask your governor whey there was no pressure on the Insurance Companies?
chinaco is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anthem of Maine requests 23% rate increase, state regulators tell them to shove it dgoldenz FIRE Related Public Policy 52 01-22-2010 07:29 PM
Blue Cross huge rate increase what to do gquiring Health and Early Retirement 40 12-18-2009 03:31 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:32 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.