 |
|
05-06-2008, 01:27 PM
|
#1
|
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 5,430
|
Is the maximum PSI printed on the tires themselves an unsafe pressure? Would that PSI cause uneven wear on the tires, does anyone know?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leonidas
No, the max is okay.
|
Leonidas, are you certain that is good information?
The way I look at it - the tire is one component; the car, it's weight, suspension, etc, are others that make up a system. I don't think it is correct to take one specification of a component, and assume it is good for the whole system.
Car suspensions are designed with the PSI that is on the sticker. Going beyond that range may not damage the tire, but it could adversely affect handling of the car, and make it less safe. I wouldn't do it unless the manufacturer said it was OK, and I personally think you should tell any passengers that they are in a car that has been modified past it's design limits. Maybe they'd rather walk.
My tires are rated for 170mph - but I doubt my brakes are! And the cylinder head bolts are probably rated to take 200 ft-lbs - but that is *not* the correct torque spec for the cylinder head. I think you are making potentially dangerous assumptions.
-ERD50
|
|
|
05-06-2008, 03:23 PM
|
#2
|
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,729
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ERD50
Leonidas, are you certain that is good information?
|
Multiquote is not working for me today, so you'll have to go back to the first page of the thread to see my original post where I said overinflation was not a good idea due to handling, safety and wear issues.
I am certain that inflation up to maximum PSI is okay for tire wear, but that you have to fill them cold and be aware of temperature changes from environmental factors to avoid overinflation.
You are correct that almost everybody should run their tires at the recommended PSI (look in the owner's manual). Personally, I tune my tire pressure by adjusting it by a few PSI at a time until I find the spot where ride and handling feel right. It's usually very close to what the recommended PSI is. A couple of pounds of pressure difference can make a vehicle feel and act very differently.
However, when I was w*rking I usually kept my tires at, or very close to max PSI. It significantly improved handling, but I felt every little bump in the road. It also tended to track along with grooved pavement (not a good thing to have happen in curves at 140). But we ran V or Z rated tires and I also had lot of training and experience in how far I could push the car at different speeds and with that much inflation in the tires.
I have blown whole tires stores full of sidewalls over the years, but those all were because I got overly aggressive in a turn and my apex point was a curb that I kissed a tad too hard. The only negatives that I ever worried about were that tires with high inflation can break free from the pavement if you push them hard enough, and (I believe but can't prove) that they tended to hydroplane easier. The first wasn't too big of a problem because you had to be really aggressive in shifting weight around to make them break free - like a J-turn - and there were times when I needed to do some of things I could do when I aggressively shifted the car around and made the tires break free - like a J-turn.  The hydroplaning thing scared the crap out of me though, and if it was raining I usually dropped the pressure down a couple of PSI at a time until I felt comfortable pushing the car a little.
I see your points and agree, although I think that anyone on this forum who is looking to boost gas mileage while talking about "imagining an egg on the accelerator pedal" is very unlikely to get themselves into trouble by riding on fully inflated tires. And if they are, then they probably aren't paying attention to anything I say about tire inflation - or saving gas.
__________________
"If everything is under control, you are going too slow." - Mario Andretti
|
|
|
05-06-2008, 04:48 PM
|
#3
|
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 5,430
|
re - ERD50 earlier post...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leonidas
so you'll have to go back to the first page of the thread to see my original post where I said overinflation was not a good idea due to handling, safety and wear issues.
|
Sorry, you're right - I missed it as we were on page 2 already.
-ERD50
|
|
|
05-06-2008, 09:09 AM
|
#4
|
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,548
|
The manual for our '02 Echo says to inflate to 35 PSI. When I bought our high performance tires, I was told it was OK to inflate them to the max, 44 PSI. Told I would get better mileage and the handling would be better. "What's the disadvantage?" I asked, and was told "Well, TromboneAl, the only disadvantage is that the ride will be rougher." The ride is fine, and we get 41-44 MPG routinely (mostly highway).
The other thing we do, that I've mentioned before, is drive 55 most times.
__________________
- Al -- Always serious, never joking. No, wait. Never serious... Always... I forget.
|
|
|
05-06-2008, 09:31 AM
|
#5
|
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: athens
Posts: 513
|
I'm no longer thinking in mpg terms; it's more of fpm, as in fillups per month. Before I stopped w**king and commuting 135 miles per day I filled up the old Camry twice a week. Now it's twice a month, maybe. Just shows that not driving is better than higher mpg. It helps to live in a smaller community too; trips are shorter. And I find it useful to combine errands as much as possible. Being well invested in commodity futures that include oil makes the whole package a little easier to stomach.
__________________
Can't you see yourself in the nursing home saying, " Darn! Wish I'd spent more time at the office instead of wasting time with family and friends."
|
|
|
05-06-2008, 09:38 AM
|
#6
|
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 342
|
And I find it useful to combine errands as much as possible. Being well invested in commodity futures that include oil makes the whole package a little easier to stomach.
I jumped into Vanguard energy a couple of years ago and have watched the 25k smidge double. I wish I would have gone bigger. But, like you, I look at that gain as mitigation of the pump pain. Do you think energy stocks will "pop" one these days (as in bubble)?
|
|
|
05-06-2008, 10:02 AM
|
#7
|
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: athens
Posts: 513
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by windsurf
And I find it useful to combine errands as much as possible. Being well invested in commodity futures that include oil makes the whole package a little easier to stomach.
I jumped into Vanguard energy a couple of years ago and have watched the 25k smidge double. I wish I would have gone bigger. But, like you, I look at that gain as mitigation of the pump pain. Do you think energy stocks will "pop" one these days (as in bubble)?
|
Yes. But the big question is when. But isn't that the whole reason for re-balancing your portfolio? My problem, and it sounds like yours too, is that I would prefer to have an even higher percentage in a well diversified commodity fund, so re-balancing some money out of the fund goes counter to my overall objective for now. But of course the risk is there that I may lose the huge runup I've got on paper. You plays your cards and takes your chances I guess.
__________________
Can't you see yourself in the nursing home saying, " Darn! Wish I'd spent more time at the office instead of wasting time with family and friends."
|
|
|
05-06-2008, 09:38 AM
|
#8
|
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 131
|
It's spring. I'm bicycling... :-) That gets me down to one fillup per month.
|
|
|
05-06-2008, 09:42 AM
|
#9
|
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 973
|
For me, drafting behind trucks is not worth the added danger to myself or others.
I will follow trucks at a standard distance and do a lot of other things that don't endanger me.
I find the biggest single helper is to use a light foot on the accelerator and brake.
__________________
"We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children.
(Ancient Indian Proverb)"
|
|
|
05-06-2008, 11:42 AM
|
#10
|
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbus
Posts: 769
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zathras
I find the biggest single helper is to use a light foot on the accelerator and brake.
|
So right you are Zathras.
DW's car has a trip computer that gives a direct readout of fuel mileage. It's amazing what just a little restraint on the accelerator yields in fuel savings. Even at highway speeds small changes can save big bucks over the life of a tank of gas. I've found I can easily beat the cruise control, especially when you encounter long grades. Letting the car slow down just a little till you top the hill really saves gas. Easing off the gas on the way down a hill instead of picking up speed by driving down the hill adds up too.
I like to avoid the packs of cars on the Interstates that require frequent speed changes too.
I always like to drive like there's a raw egg between my foot and the accelerator. Easy does it. And learn to anticipate road conditions ahead and make small changes in speed to avoid using the brakes.
|
|
|
05-06-2008, 12:14 PM
|
#11
|
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,118
|
Okay, let's consider run the numbers: - Savings achieved through better mileage: variable, but let's say an average of $200 annually multiplied by, say, three years (before an accident happens);
- Cost of destroying your vehicle in a rear-end collision: variable, but let's say an average of $15,000 (only incurred once in a lifetime);
- Cost of funeral expenses due to being killed in said rear-end collision: variable, but let's say an average of $10,000.
So, CBA suggests the potential direct financial costs ($25,000) outweigh the potential financial benefits ($600). And that's not even considering the non-financial costs, or the indirect financial costs.
No thanks!
__________________
"There is no more dreadful punishment than futile and hopeless labour" - Albert Camus
"Why should I let the toad work squat on my life? Can't I use my wit as a pitchfork and drive the brute off?" - Philip Larkin
|
|
|
05-06-2008, 12:19 PM
|
#12
|
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,404
|
Need to setup those computer controlled cars for highway driving. That way traffic would be smoother. Drafting would be possible. Less traffic jams would increase mpg.
__________________
If your gonna be dumb you gotta be tough
|
|
|
05-06-2008, 12:25 PM
|
#13
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,432
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Milton
Okay, let's consider run the numbers: - Savings achieved through better mileage: variable, but let's say an average of $200 annually multiplied by, say, three years (before an accident happens);
- Cost of destroying your vehicle in a rear-end collision: variable, but let's say an average of $15,000 (only incurred once in a lifetime);
- Cost of funeral expenses due to being killed in said rear-end collision: variable, but let's say an average of $10,000.
So, CBA suggests the potential direct financial costs ($25,000) outweigh the potential financial benefits ($600). And that's not even considering the non-financial costs, or the indirect financial costs.
No thanks! 
|
Early inheritance and bonus life insurance for heirs and beneficiaries: priceless.
|
|
|
05-06-2008, 10:07 AM
|
#14
|
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,729
|
I may have to correct myself. I can't find anything that says overinflation causes hydroplaning, but my non-technical feeling is that it should. Back when I had a j*b we would push the envelope pretty hard on driving and I hydroplaned on all four tires several times. There's nothing like going down the interstate sideways at 80, with no steering control, to make you very sensitive to things like tread wear and tire inflation.
__________________
"If everything is under control, you are going too slow." - Mario Andretti
|
|
|
05-06-2008, 10:22 AM
|
#15
|
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2005
Location: DFW
Posts: 6,334
|
__________________
Have Funds, Will Retire
"...but do feel free to assert your duly noted opinion on this subject again without benefit of reference or provision of additional information..."
|
|
|
05-06-2008, 10:24 AM
|
#16
|
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Losing my whump
Posts: 22,526
|
Bunch of bad ideas in general. Mostly stuff that saves you a few pennies now and costs you more later on.
Many vehicles are designed for a specific tire footprint and inflation rate. Changing that may result in changes to handling and braking. Overinflation wears your tires out in the middle fast while leaving tread unworn on the edges.
Pulse driving wears on a number of driveline components.
Tailgating can get you dead fast. You need to get within 10 feet of the truck in front of you to get a mileage boost. At that speed, you'll need to keep adjusting your speed to avoid crashing into the truck and keeping to within 10 feet. That on-off-on-off the gas can end up costing you mileage.
Eliminating unnecessary trips and driving under 55mph with properly inflated tires, avoiding any leadfooting and observing the traffic ahead of you and modulating speed gently to suit will offer pretty good gas mileage.
I just adopted a great strategy for picking up 7mpg. I started driving our Rav4 as my primary car instead of the Pilot.
__________________
Many an optimist has become rich by buying out a pessimist
|
|
|
05-06-2008, 10:34 AM
|
#17
|
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,139
|
My manufacturer recommends 33psi, but I find I get the best handling at 42psi. I used to always dread having to convince servicepeople that I knew what I was talking about and 42 was the right pressure for my tires, but recently I found a great workaround: I just made my own sticker that says 42psi and stuck that over the manufacturer sticker on the inside of the door and in the glove compartment.
Another thing I do for mileage is get regular alignments. Most people don't know that for $150-$200 you can buy a lifetime 4 wheel alignment warranty for your car. I bring the car in around every 10-15k miles, and every time they find something slightly out of spec. It's a bit of a hassle but also saves on tires because you get full warranty miles out of them.
Drafting? No friggin way.
|
|
|
05-06-2008, 10:55 AM
|
#18
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,432
|
Re drafting behind a semi on the highway--wouldn't that hurt the semi's MPG to be pulling you along? I could see some sudden stops on the truckdriver's part to deal with that problem....
|
|
|
05-06-2008, 11:00 AM
|
#19
|
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,404
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bestwifeever
Re drafting behind a semi on the highway--wouldn't that hurt the semi's MPG to be pulling you along? I could see some sudden stops on the truckdriver's part to deal with that problem....
|
No, because you are in the air the semi already cleared. (which is a super simple explanation)
Thats the problem sudden stops.
__________________
If your gonna be dumb you gotta be tough
|
|
|
05-06-2008, 11:35 AM
|
#20
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,432
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Notmuchlonger
No, because you are in the air the semi already cleared. (which is a super simple explanation)
Thats the problem sudden stops. 
|
Ahh, I see--thanks. I was misunderstanding.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|