Join Early Retirement Today
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Arithmetic vs. Geometric Mean
Old 06-05-2007, 01:56 PM   #1
Dryer sheet wannabe
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 12
Arithmetic vs. Geometric Mean

In reviewing the paper "A Gentle Introduction to the Calculus of Retirement Income" by Milevsky (, something is not clear to me. Two of the input variables for his equation are the mean and standard deviation of the investment. I understand that these are arithmetic rather than geometric values. If I know the geometric values, I understand that I can compute the approximate arithmetic mean by adding half of the variance (square of the standard deviation). For example, IFA reports that over the last 50 years, their Index Portfolio 75 has an annualized (geometric) return of 12.54% and a standard deviation of 12.11%. Adding in half of the variance gives an arithmetic mean of 13.27%. If I am considering this particular investment, should I use 13.27% for the mean and 12.11% for the standard deviation when using Milevsly's equation?

rwwoods is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 06-05-2007, 04:05 PM   #2
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 117
I believe the answer is given on page 6 of 6:

"Finally, assume that your client’s investment portfolio is allocated to a mix of balanced mutual funds (or ETFs, SMAs, etc) and you estimate that this portfolio will earn {μ = 0.075 }, which is an arithmetic average of 7.5% in any given year, with a standard deviation or volatility of {σ = 0.18}, which is 18% per year, both in inflationadjusted terms. These numbers are consistent with the well-known and widely-cited numbers by Ibbotson Associates (2004). In some sense, the precise magnitude of these numbers is less important than the general awareness that they can fluctuate and hence are yet another source of retirement risk."

slepyhed is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Relentless Rules of Humble Arithmetic mickeyd FIRE and Money 0 02-23-2006 09:56 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:36 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.