Ian S
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Kind of a hypothetical here. Assume single male retiring at age 65 with total of $1.5M in assets including $300K paid off home. Of those assets, only $100K is in a taxable account - all the rest in IRAs with 60-30-10 distribution of stocks/bonds/cash. At age 65, eligible for SS benefits of $2000/mo. Assume also that the taxable account consists entirely of highly appreciated stock consisting mostly of LTGs. Living expenses of $50K/year.
Would the individual be better, in general, to live off the taxable account until it is exhausted then take SS or start taking SS immediately and extend the life of the taxable account or even dip into the IRAs for some percentage of expenses? Or are these the sorts of details that retirement planners of some sort can effectively deal with?
Would the individual be better, in general, to live off the taxable account until it is exhausted then take SS or start taking SS immediately and extend the life of the taxable account or even dip into the IRAs for some percentage of expenses? Or are these the sorts of details that retirement planners of some sort can effectively deal with?