|
|
05-05-2013, 11:15 AM
|
#1
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Castro Valley
Posts: 788
|
Bonds - What to do?
Is anyone else worried about the potential Bond bubble? I've read several articles advising to reduce bond exposure to next to nil. With equities at an all time high and cash yielding an all time low, what are the alternatives?
Just curious what everyone else is thinking or doing?
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
05-05-2013, 11:24 AM
|
#2
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hooverville
Posts: 22,983
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jkern
Is anyone else worried about the potential Bond bubble? I've read several articles advising to reduce bond exposure to next to nil. With equities at an all time high and cash yielding an all time low, what are the alternatives?
Just curious what everyone else is thinking or doing?
|
The only alternative that makes any sense would be cash. Only a remote chance would take bonds and not equities down strongly.
The whole purpose of these low rates is to drive savers toward more risk.
As anyone who has ever seen a loading chute knows, it is usually smart to avoid whatever you are being driven toward.
Ha
__________________
"As a general rule, the more dangerous or inappropriate a conversation, the more interesting it is."-Scott Adams
|
|
|
05-05-2013, 11:40 AM
|
#3
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Harrogate, UK
Posts: 921
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by haha
The whole purpose of these low rates is to drive savers toward more risk.
As anyone who has ever seen a loading chute knows, it is usually smart to avoid whatever you are being driven toward.
Ha
|
So THAT'S why I have those whip marks on my back.....
|
|
|
05-05-2013, 11:42 AM
|
#4
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,906
|
Eventually (exactly when no one knows) the Fed will stop buying bonds at which time bond prices will drop and yields will rise. Historically during times of negative real interest rates, such as we have now, precious metals have performed well. Don't fight the Fed.
|
|
|
05-05-2013, 11:46 AM
|
#5
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,901
|
About 50% of our fixed income allocation is invested in cash, CDs, or i-bonds. About 25% is invested in intermediate bonds, investment grade or better, with a duration < 5 years. The last 25% is invested in PIMCO Total Return (only bond fund choice in DW's 401K). Hopefully Bill Gross will see us through those uncertain times.
|
|
|
05-05-2013, 11:48 AM
|
#6
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,154
|
Well, what is one supposed to do. You need bonds for ballast. I would just stay in the middle of the ship with intermediate bonds.
|
|
|
05-05-2013, 12:03 PM
|
#7
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 18,731
|
Fed implied they will keep rates low until unemployment is down to 6.5% and inflation is increasing. I would suspect a lot of people will be asleap at the wheel when bonds and bond funds see their NAV start heading down.
__________________
*********Go Yankees!*********
|
|
|
05-05-2013, 12:13 PM
|
#8
|
gone traveling
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 559
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jkern
Is anyone else worried about the potential Bond bubble? I've read several articles advising to reduce bond exposure to next to nil. With equities at an all time high and cash yielding an all time low, what are the alternatives?
Just curious what everyone else is thinking or doing?
|
if bonds are a bubble-and equitys are at all times highs-isn't that a bubble.
cash or cd-the only out..
you can't win so stay the course. what else can you do
|
|
|
05-05-2013, 01:00 PM
|
#9
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: irradiated - too close to the nuclear furnace
Posts: 1,294
|
I have kept about 35% of the portfolio in my 401k to use the stable value fund for fixed income, the yield now is 3.2%. Anything much higher than that would worry me they are taking too much risk but this fund has performed well over the the years. In a rollover IRA I have an equal allocation to the Vanguard TIPS (which I think was a mistake) and the Intermediate Investment Grade bond fund which I'm ok with.
It's a tough situation - bonds are paying dick and poised to take a hit while equities are sky high and have to correct to some point some day. Talk about a rock and a hard place!
|
|
|
05-05-2013, 01:23 PM
|
#10
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 939
|
Not a good time to be in bonds, IMHO - neither in funds or owning bonds directly. All of my good-paying bonds are being called. I expect my bond funds to go down in NAV... I'm seriously thinking of selling the funds Monday and doing other things with the money (more risky but way more profit).
__________________
I used to be “Thinker25” here. Retired at 62, now 73 (in 2021), no regrets & single again. I love it. I’m in RI.
|
|
|
05-05-2013, 01:26 PM
|
#11
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,240
|
I mentioned in another thread that I'm being pointed toward bank loans instead of bonds. I'm still unsure about it, but I haven't heard positive recommendations toward any other alternatives. :\
|
|
|
05-05-2013, 01:32 PM
|
#12
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Bernalillo, NM
Posts: 2,717
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrayHare
Eventually (exactly when no one knows) the Fed will stop buying bonds at which time bond prices will drop and yields will rise. Historically during times of negative real interest rates, such as we have now, precious metals have performed well. Don't fight the Fed.
|
What I was reading today speculated that the change in value will happen very quickly, so keep in short term bonds. Even though indications are the Fed will keep rates low until 2015, that still seem close to me.
__________________
"We live the lives we lead because of the thoughts we think" ...Michael O’Neill
"We can cannot compel others to do our will" ....Norman Goldman
"There never is shortage of the gullible to accept the illogical"...Anonymous
|
|
|
05-05-2013, 01:44 PM
|
#13
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,555
|
I mentioned the same thing as verumchuka a month or so ago: I have the option of moving about $500,000 from stable accounts (mostly paying about 1.62%, about $120k paying about 2,25%) into Vanguard accounts - my AA is and would be 60s/40b. My thought then was to leave the bond portion in the account paying 2.25% until a better time to pay into bonds. Have about a month before I can transfer anything (post retirement)
The rates are a bit different now than what I posted last time. The ones in this post are more accurate - not exact, but close enough to give an idea The large account follows ten year treasuries, and I'm not sure how the smaller account is figured.
http://www.early-retirement.org/foru...egy-65556.html
__________________
"Growing old is no excuse for growing up."
|
|
|
05-05-2013, 03:36 PM
|
#14
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,252
|
I thought the "bond bubble" was last month's worry and we are now beyond it.
Lots of threads over on Bogleheads were started in March-April on the subject, but the recent rally to all-time highs has quieted things down a bit.
Here are some recent threads to read on the subject:
Bogleheads • View topic - Vanguard: Six questions (and answers) about bonds (Links a Vanguard Q&A article which is very good)
Bogleheads • View topic - A graphic on the role of bonds (Role of bonds in a portfolio)
A surprising (to me) fraction of Bogleheads have reported that they shortened their bond durations. This is remarkable from the "stay-the-course" crowd. Folks have gone to CDs, stable value funds, I-bonds, and short-term bond funds.
|
|
|
05-05-2013, 04:02 PM
|
#15
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,350
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by veremchuka
I have kept about 35% of the portfolio in my 401k to use the stable value fund for fixed income, the yield now is 3.2%. Anything much higher than that would worry me they are taking too much risk but this fund has performed well over the the years. In a rollover IRA I have an equal allocation to the Vanguard TIPS (which I think was a mistake) and the Intermediate Investment Grade bond fund which I'm ok with.
It's a tough situation - bonds are paying dick and poised to take a hit while equities are sky high and have to correct to some point some day. Talk about a rock and a hard place!
|
I'm still somewhat new to investing but my understanding is that bonds don't drop by very much whereas equities could drop by 1/3 within a matter of months. Seems like bonds are better, even now, for people who are concerned about volitility. Am I wrong? When I say bonds, i'm referring to bond funds such as total bond market funds.
|
|
|
05-05-2013, 04:44 PM
|
#17
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,797
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gerrym51
|
Another company with similar offerings as ETF's- and at lower exp ratios (~0.24% vs 0.4%) IF you use deep disc broker to buy 'em-
ETFs | Guggenheim Investments
|
|
|
05-05-2013, 04:48 PM
|
#18
|
gone traveling
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 559
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ERhoosier
Another company with similar offerings as ETF's- and at lower exp ratios (~0.24% vs 0.4%) IF you use deep disc broker to buy 'em-
ETFs | Guggenheim Investments
|
bulletshares(guggenheim) are corporate bonds
fidelity are
these are municpal bonds not taxable
i live in massachusetts where fidelity is so munis are also lower state tax rate and not taxable at all on federal tax
|
|
|
05-05-2013, 05:56 PM
|
#19
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 18,085
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU
I mentioned in another thread that I'm being pointed toward bank loans instead of bonds. I'm still unsure about it, but I haven't heard positive recommendations toward any other alternatives. :\
|
Bank loans have little if any interest rate risk, which is why they are suggested. The problem is that they all have substantial junk grade credit risk and the junk market has gotten stupid. I owned this stuff as the markets clawed their way out of the bust, but would not touch them now.
If you want an alternative to index bond funds, keep your durations short, your credit quality high, and make sure your funds own no agency mortgage backed securities (fannies, freddies, ginnies). The optionality embedded in gubmint mortgage bonds means that bondholders will get disastrously killed when rates rise and reported durations on these securities are effectively meaningless.
Other alternatives I have been making use of are merger abitrage funds, CDs, I bonds and plain old cash.
__________________
"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."
- George Orwell
Ezekiel 23:20
|
|
|
05-05-2013, 06:12 PM
|
#20
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Reno
Posts: 1,338
|
Bonds
Brewer's advice is good, although I have moved about 10% of my bond allocation through harvesting gains into Floating Rate. Despite the important risk he notes. In a credit crisis, they would be killed; if it's interest rates rising, not so much. Also have moved similar allocations into emerging bonds (Fidelity New Markets) and foreign currency funds (Templeton GIM) . Also decreased duration, with more in short-term. Finally, you could consider a Guggenheim Bullet-bond ladder. And I bonds. And cash is not trash. Your mileage may vary; and most of these incur more risk, from a traditional perspective, than vanilla Treasury bonds. Pick your poison.
I've been making these changes over the last two years, gradually. Grundlich is probably talking his book but argued recently--as he has for the last two years--that with QE, we'll be in low yields and high bond prices for a long time. I tend to agree so I've been using primarily gains to make these moves.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|