Early Retirement Forums

Go Back   Early Retirement Forums > General > FIRE and Money





Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 08-08-2007, 09:51 PM   #1
A854321
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 274
Brokerage fees?

What would be a reasonable brokerage fee for a diversified IRA account at a large brokerage house?

My most recent quarterly statement showed a fee of 0.28%. This fee is assessed quarterly
A854321 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 10:10 PM   #2
haha
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
haha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 8,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by A854321 View Post
What would be a reasonable brokerage fee for a diversified IRA account at a large brokerage house?

My most recent quarterly statement showed a fee of 0.28%. This fee is assessed quarterly
This is definitely not reasonable. Many places it would be free. At others maybe a flat $10 fee.

Give more details and we can make more complete suggestions.

Ha
__________________
"Show 'em just enough to win the turkey."- Former KY Governor Bert Combs
haha is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 10:18 PM   #3
A854321
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 274
Yes, more info

This an actively managed account established 14 years ago.

11% annual return. Currently at $1.4 mil.
A854321 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 10:22 PM   #4
73ss454
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,758
Pretty cute how they show the expense ratio quarterly. It's still over 1% which is too much. Move it all to Vanguard and make it easy.
73ss454 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 10:28 PM   #5
Sam
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,743
How much does Vanguard charge, by the way?

I'm now using Fidelity, it costs me nothing as my employer pays the administrative fees.
Sam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 10:31 PM   #6
73ss454
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,758
With 1.4M this qualifies for flagship and I don't think there's any costs at all. Just the ER for what ever fund it goes into. Also 12 free trades a year and $8 after that. 500K must be in vanguard funds though.
73ss454 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 10:51 PM   #7
A854321
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 274
Just to clarify

This is a post-divorce issue. I got handed a big pile of really cute reports from this brokerage, and am trying to make heads and tails.

Neither of us ever actively managed this portfolio- there (obviously) was a broker that did all this. We never made a trade.

So, as I am unsophisticated, and not ready to risk this on webreports and forum trading hints........ would this be an excessive fee for what looks like a reasonable, totally broker-managed portfolio?
A854321 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007, 05:11 AM   #8
clifp
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
clifp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,164
Actually 11% is surprisingly respectable return for an brokerage account with a 1%+ fee on the assets plus probably commissions. I am not sure I actually believe it.

A fair number of Vanguard funds index funds were established in the 1992-1994 time frame and most of them have returns in the 10-11% range.

If it is worthwhile to pay a broker almost $16,000/year to manage your IRA fund is question you'll have to answer yourself. But by the standards of the financial "helper" industry it is not unreasonable especially considering the returns, which are quite good if the portfolio contains fixed income investments.
clifp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007, 06:28 AM   #9
LOL!
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,298
FWIW, there are places where one can get $1.4million managed for a flat fee of around $3000 a year and places where the fee is 0.25% of assets under management (AUM) or less per year. However, I think a 1% annual fee is fairly typical for assets under 7-figures from large brokerage places.

One should also be aware that all fees are negotiable even if the provider says they are not. Also be aware that there can be other fees such as front-end loads which may not be included in the 11% annual return.

In 2006, a simple all-equities index fund strategy returned about 20%. When the divorcee mentions an 11% return, we would need more info to really characterize that as good, bad, or indifferent. For example, if any trading in the account created taxable events and you ended up paying the taxes out of salary, then things could be quite different. But if the account did significant tax-loss harvesting, then that would be a benefit.

Last edited by LOL!; 08-09-2007 at 06:39 AM.
LOL! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007, 09:35 AM   #10
FinanceDude
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
FinanceDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,430
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOL! View Post
FWIW, there are places where one can get $1.4million managed for a flat fee of around $3000 a year and places where the fee is 0.25% of assets under management (AUM) or less per year. However, I think a 1% annual fee is fairly typical for assets under 7-figures from large brokerage places.
The account is over $1Million, so he definitely can negotiate the fees.

Quote:
In 2006, a simple all-equities index fund strategy returned about 20%. When the divorcee mentions an 11% return, we would need more info to really characterize that as good, bad, or indifferent. For example, if any trading in the account created taxable events and you ended up paying the taxes out of salary, then things could be quite different. But if the account did significant tax-loss harvesting, then that would be a benefit.
He said it was in an IRA account, so there would be no taxable events. However, I am wondering how they are getting the fee paid, separate monthly billing? Management fees are billed quarterly, and they list it as .28% because that's what he paid for that quarter, 25% of 1.12%.........

If it was straight stock, and very little trading, he should be able to get that down to 50-60bp or so........

BTW, just telling him to "move it to Vanguard" when he has little or no knowledge is a little premature. I think he needs to learn more about investing before that occurs. You guys may disagree but I think he needs to learn more about his account and what options he has before making quick decisions.......
__________________
Consult with your own advisor or representative. My thoughts should not be construed as investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results (love that one).......:)

President Obama, please know that I will continue to cling to my guns and religion........:)
FinanceDude is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007, 10:32 AM   #11
73ss454
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,758
If he moves more than 250K to vanguard he'll get a free advise from one of the planners. No tax consequence in taxadvantaged account. He doesn't have to know much to move this money. It's a no brainer to me.
73ss454 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007, 10:53 AM   #12
FIRE'd@51
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
FIRE'd@51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,056
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOL! View Post
In 2006, a simple all-equities index fund strategy returned about 20%. When the divorcee mentions an 11% return, we would need more info to really characterize that as good, bad, or indifferent. For example, if any trading in the account created taxable events and you ended up paying the taxes out of salary, then things could be quite different. But if the account did significant tax-loss harvesting, then that would be a benefit.
I interpreted A854321's post to mean the actively managed fund has returned 11% compounded over the past 14 years. If so, this is slightly better than the total return of the S&P 500 over the same time period (10.9%).

Of course, we don't know enough about the fund to make a risk-adjusted comparison to a benchmark, but at first glance, it appears to have been a decent performance if my interpretation of the 11% is correct.
FIRE'd@51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007, 11:24 AM   #13
FinanceDude
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
FinanceDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,430
Quote:
Originally Posted by 73ss454 View Post
If he moves more than 250K to vanguard he'll get a free advise from one of the planners. No tax consequence in taxadvantaged account. He doesn't have to know much to move this money. It's a no brainer to me.
He potentially has estate issues and other things in play, I don't think a Vanguard rep is qualified to answer, perhaps start with a CPA or estate planning attorney.............
__________________
Consult with your own advisor or representative. My thoughts should not be construed as investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results (love that one).......:)

President Obama, please know that I will continue to cling to my guns and religion........:)
FinanceDude is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007, 11:42 AM   #14
A854321
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 274
Trying to get a grip on costs at this time

Yup, financedude has pretty much explained what I was trying to say.

Costs for everything involving lawyers, accountants, advisors are all adding up. Not haveing activly managed this IRA, ( mostly mutual funds, not much in stocks), I was surprised to see how much the charges were.

I just don't know what is realistic % of fees/charges for an account like this. I do not not plan on managing the account myself, and have appreciated having a professional to deal with it, while I dealt with my job and making the money.

Any ideas what other brokerages charge for this type of account?
A854321 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007, 12:55 PM   #15
A854321
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 274
Aha!

I found an article by Richard Ferri called "The Price of Advice".

He has lots of reasonable advice about not being impressed by fancy offices, addresses, and glossy brochures. He says " a fee of 0.50% per year on accounts from $100k to $1 mil is about right and assets over $1 mil should be half of that amount. A minimum fee of $500 per year is reasonable on accounts less than $100K."
A854321 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007, 12:59 PM   #16
FinanceDude
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
FinanceDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,430
Quote:
Originally Posted by A854321 View Post
I found an article by Richard Ferri called "The Price of Advice".

He has lots of reasonable advice about not being impressed by fancy offices, addresses, and glossy brochures. He says " a fee of 0.50% per year on accounts from $100k to $1 mil is about right and assets over $1 mil should be half of that amount. A minimum fee of $500 per year is reasonable on accounts less than $100K."
I've seen that article. Accounts at $1 million and above are competed for aggressively..........

An advisor I used to work with recently bid on a $30 million account. His "winning bid" was 28bp a year, andf he was competing against Chase Private Bank, Merrill Lynch, Northern Trust, and Smith Barney...........
__________________
Consult with your own advisor or representative. My thoughts should not be construed as investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results (love that one).......:)

President Obama, please know that I will continue to cling to my guns and religion........:)
FinanceDude is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007, 01:23 PM   #17
LOL!
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,298
Quote:
Originally Posted by A854321 View Post
\Any ideas what other brokerages charge for this type of account?
Other brokerages and financial advisors charge about 1% of AUM per year. As I wrote before, you should be able to get this done for $3000 or 0.25% of AUM or less.
See e.g.: Bogleheads :: View topic - Ferri, Evanson, or Gorlow as my new advisor? Help please!
It seems to me you could save yourself at least $12,000 a year by moving and perhaps get better performance.
LOL! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007, 01:42 PM   #18
A854321
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 274
Not me

Excellent article, LOL.

It wasn't me with that original post, although it certainly could have been. I will review all this really valuable information. Thanks very much.
A854321 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007, 01:52 PM   #19
Moemg
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Moemg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sarasota,fl.
Posts: 3,093
Vanguard charges 0.75 % for the first million It actively manages and 0.35 % for the next million .That is an annual fee .
Moemg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007, 01:54 PM   #20
FinanceDude
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
FinanceDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,430
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moemg View Post
Vanguard charges 0.75 % for the first million It actively manages and 0.35 % for the next million .That is an annual fee .
Seems high for Vanguard.........
__________________
Consult with your own advisor or representative. My thoughts should not be construed as investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results (love that one).......:)

President Obama, please know that I will continue to cling to my guns and religion........:)
FinanceDude is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes