RunningBum
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2007
- Messages
- 13,236
I've never seen where they are asking for taxable income, nor net income, nor that some seldom used practice be used.
We've gotten a few lines of credit with a "made up" income. I didn't think income had anything to do with net worth.As far as the car, in real life, I've been leasing Mercedes from the same dealer for over 25 years now. When I first RE'd I asked my regular salesman what I should put down as my income; at the time I technically didn't have any income at all.
He shook his head and said: "Just put down anything. We've already pre-approved you" adding with a laugh "that's what got this country into the financial mess it's in!".
Right...for example, the mortgage I applied for, they wanted my last 3 months of pay statements...so I would assume that proof of three months of roughly equal distributions would be about the same....Not substantively different but if he had a history of $8,333 withdrawn monthly it seems that they would count it as income but $100k whenever marko wants they won't count... silly but that is from the same folks who would consider Roth conversions to be income... so go figure.
The point is if you're asking them for credit (like in a lease) you need to conform to their perceptions of what income is, not yours (unless you don't care if you are approved or not).
Do you mean distributions for a tIRA or 401K? I haven't taken anyone, but I would include that as income because I see that going into my checking account to cover expenses.Do y'all include tax-deferred income? For some reason I haven't been doing so.
If you mean dividends and distributions thrown from tIRA investments that stay in the tIRA, no, never considered that.
No specific definition for income. Note that they include assets as well as income. Certainly the intent is clear, to determine whether I can make the payments, and my assets that I'm willing to withdraw at a sustainable rate would seem to meet that criteria.§ 1026.51 Ability to Pay.
...
(ii) Reasonable policies and procedures. Card issuers must establish and maintain reasonable written policies and procedures to consider the consumer's ability to make the required minimum payments under the terms of the account based on a consumer's income or assets [emphasis mine] and a consumer's current obligations. Reasonable policies and procedures includetreating any income and assets to which the consumer has a reasonable expectation of access as the consumer's income or assets, or limiting consideration of the consumer's income or assets to the consumer's independent income and assets. Reasonable policies and procedures also include consideration of at least one of the following: The ratio of debt obligations to income; the ratio of debt obligations to assets; or the income the consumer will have after paying debt obligations. It would be unreasonable for a card issuer not to review any information about a consumer's income or assets and current obligations, or to issue a credit card to a consumer who does not have any income or assets.
It is interesting that the lenders don't have or provide more detailed guidance on what they want to be included in income... otherwise they get a potporri of individual interpretations of what income is.
I just make up a number. I don't use numbers from tax forms because I set my income there to whatever amount I think will work out for me in the line run. Using dividends and interest also doesn't make sense to me because if I'm a growth investor, I have no dividends, but at least as good prospects for portfolio growth. Take 3 or 4 percent of your portfolio as a starting point and alter as needed.
Credit rating agencies and banks don't care AT ALL about assets, unless you're using them for collateral. They care about regular income (which is how they determine whether you have the ability to repay a loan), % of credit utilized, your repayment history, etc. Here's what FICO uses to create your credit score. No assets here.I can't really show finite income. To me I'm less of a risk, as I have the money. If I had a real job, at one of application, and later lost it..then I may not have the means to pay the rent. Can someone give me experienced guidance? Thanks
Credit rating agencies and banks don't care AT ALL about assets, unless you're using them for collateral. They care about regular income (which is how they determine whether you have the ability to repay a loan), % of credit utilized, your repayment history, etc. Here's what FICO uses to create your credit score. No assets here.
- 35% Payment History (longer on-time payment history = higher score)
- 30% Amount You Owe (Utilization goal is <30% of available credit)
- 15% Length of Credit History (the longer your oldest account is open, the better - best not to close your oldest accounts)
- 10% New Credit Opened (opening new accounts lowers your score)
- 10% Types of Credit You Have (Installment, revolving, mortgage, etc. The more types of credit you have utilized in the past several years, the better).
From other threads here, you're best off setting up regular, more or less even distributions.
An idle question on a foggy Saturday morning:
Not counting SS, rental income or anything other than your portfolio, how do you count your income?
Example: If your portfolio made $400K and your SWR is $120K but you only paid taxes on $30K what would you consider your income?
I think it might depend on who's asking; that is, when it's time to do a new car lease, I'd use the total portfolio number (if larger that year) but on a practical day-to-day level I consider my income to be my SWR, then there are instances where I might answer on what I paid taxes on.
Again, limiting it to portfolio only. Just curious.
But, my real question is, is this 'need to show real income' necessary for a rental of an apartment? Or does the proof of cash in the bank allow the lease to be approved? Thanks
simple. it's all income. every penny, every source...SS, pension, PT job (when i had one), gifts, interest & dividends, realized gains. all income flows into our checking account and whatever $ hits our checking acct is counted as income. from there we spend some, save/invest some, give some now, plan to give more later.An idle question on a foggy Saturday morning:
Not counting SS, rental income or anything other than your portfolio, how do you count your income?
Example: If your portfolio made $400K and your SWR is $120K but you only paid taxes on $30K what would you consider your income?
I think it might depend on who's asking; that is, when it's time to do a new car lease, I'd use the total portfolio number (if larger that year) but on a practical day-to-day level I consider my income to be my SWR, then there are instances where I might answer on what I paid taxes on.
Again, limiting it to portfolio only. Just curious.
Fairly long thread, I don't think anyone asked this:
DH consults part time (20 hours/week) We have to keep our income within MAGI~$62K I think. Since we never know before January of the following year what VG income (dividends and qualified capital gains), it's usually a guessing game-we do have the HSA advantage of $8K to deduct.
DH took a job in 2019 as consultant and will finish the job in 2019. He told the hiring company he did not want to get paid until 2020. This will keep us safely under $62K. I question this. So he invoices in 2019. Payment in 2020, income in 2020?
I feel so ignorant. So, if on December 30, 2019 he made a $20K contribution to his tIRA, we'd be in the clear for 2019 income, no worries? That $20K no longer income. But if they take the taxes when issuing the check, does that change things? YourEncore (consulting middleman takes out taxes when issuing his check).Yes, since you are a tax-basis taxpayer.
But if he billed and received in 2019 couldn't he make a deductible tIRA contribution to nullify the income (if he doesn't need the money for spending)?
Found this:
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/magi.asp
"A taxpayer can then calculate MAGI after finalizing AGI. To calculate MAGI, the taxpayer adds back certain deductions to AGI, many of which are rare and not utilized. Therefore, it is fairly uncommon for one's MAGI to differ greatly from AGI. The IRS explains that deductions added back to calculate MAGI include items such as foreign investment income, half of any self-employment taxes, student loan interest, passive or rental losses, IRA contributions, and higher education costs. The MAGI then dictates the use of premium tax credits and retirement plans. For example, eligibility for premium tax credits occurs when an individual's MAGI is greater than 100% but less than 400% of the federal poverty line for their family size."
I feel so ignorant. So, if on December 30, 2019 he made a $20K contribution to his tIRA, we'd be in the clear for 2019 income, no worries? That $20K no longer income. But if they take the taxes when issuing the check, does that change things? YourEncore (consulting middleman takes out taxes when issuing his check).
EDIT: I just found this. There is no limit on contributions as he is not covered by employer for tIRA plan at his consulting job.
https://www.irs.gov/retirement-plan...-are-not-covered-by-a-retirement-plan-at-work
Do I understand this correctly?
Another EDIT: He can contribute $7K and take off MAGI. Sorry, just did my homework. OMG, I am now truly confused as this is my 3rd EDIT. I'm getting conflicting info all over the place in my search.
... For 2019, your total contributions to all of your traditional and Roth IRAs cannot be more than:
$6,000 ($7,000 if you’re age 50 or older), or
your taxable compensation for the year, if your compensation was less than this dollar limit. ...
If you file a joint return, you may be able to contribute to an IRA even if you did not have taxable compensation as long as your spouse did. The amount of your combined contributions can’t be more than the taxable compensation reported on your joint return. See the formula in IRS Publication 590-A. ...
Ahh,You need to be careful... there are different MAGIs for different purposes.... for ACA, IRA deductions are not added back.
http://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/pdf/2019/magi.pdf