scrabbler1
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2009
- Messages
- 6,699
I have been carrying Med Pay instead of UMBI because the Med Pay did not require determination of fault. Is that a crazy choice?
Med Pay and UMBI are 2 different coverages. While there is some overlap in what they cover, there are many differences, too. Med Pay covers you and your car's occupants for medical bills if you are in an accident, regardless of fault. It would also cover you in single-car accidents. UMBI, or Uninsured Motorists Bodily Injury, covers you and your car's occupants in case you are in a multi-car accident and the other driver is at fault and lacks any insurance. UMBI will also pay for non-medical damages including non-economic damages (i.e. pain and suffering). In my years of working in the personal auto insurance industry, most policies had both coverages (or, if the state allowed No-Fault, that coverage instead of Med Pay).