easysurfer
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2008
- Messages
- 13,151
I started off in my target allocation at the beginning of 2011, but the equity market swoon and bond rise in late 2011 was enough to cause a rebalance even with my very conservative triggers, and then recovered enough a few months later to rebalance again the other way. If you look at what happened last year, from end of May to end of September the S&P dropped close to 20%, then recovered almost 27% by March of 2012. Those swings are big enough to get most people's AAs well out of balance. Now, if you rode the round trip and took no action, you might never have noticed......
Edited to add: I'm tired of these round trips in less than a year, and I sure hope we don't go through it yet again! It's not fun rebalancing under these volatile conditions.
Audrey,
The round trips is a major reason why I decided to just rebalance once a year. Instead of rebalancing after an early sharp change, why do it again during the year? Kind of like changing lanes too often in a traffic jam or flipping through the channels on a remote only to settle on the program I was watching in the first place.
I think the sound approach is to have a strategy based on a set frequency of rebalancing (or percentage of allocation drift, as you did) and stick to it. Of course, the challenge is to try to keep emotions totally out of the process. Otherwise, the second guessing of oneself takes on a life of it's own.
Easysurfer
Last edited: