Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Confused about IRA withdrawals between 59.5 and 70.5
Old 12-13-2012, 03:55 PM   #1
Moderator
rodi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 9,261
Confused about IRA withdrawals between 59.5 and 70.5

A coworker told me that once you start taking money from an IRA/401k, you MUST take distributions each year, going forward.

I can't find anything to confirm that - just a lot of stuff about RMD's once you reach 70.5yo.

Example: retiree is 61 and has an unexpected expense. For cash flow reasons they'd like to pay for that expense from IRA or 401k money. Since the person is over 59.5 - they can access the tax deferred money penalty free. Obviously, they'd be paying taxes on the withdrawal.

Does this trigger mandatory withdrawals for following years?

I think my coworker is wrong.. but I'd like to know if he's right, and I'm wrong. This will make a difference in our spend-down plans.
__________________

rodi is online now   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 12-13-2012, 03:56 PM   #2
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
REWahoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 43,364
Your co-worker is wrong.
__________________

__________________
Numbers is hard

Although rare, it is possible to read something on this forum you don't agree with and simply move on with your life

Retired in 2005 at age 58, no pension
REWahoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 04:02 PM   #3
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
RockyMtn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North Scottsdale
Posts: 1,271
after 59 1/2 you can withdrawl without penalty (other than the taxes you owe). It does not trigger mandatory withdrawls for following years.

Mandatory withdrawls must begin at 70 1/2 and then occur yearly based on life expectancy at the time you turn 70 1/2.
__________________
FIRE'D in July 2009 at 51...Never look back!
RockyMtn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 04:04 PM   #4
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Vermont & Sarasota, FL
Posts: 17,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by REWahoo View Post
Your co-worker is wrong.
+1
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 04:08 PM   #5
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
youbet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,055
A co-worker told me that listening to financial advise given by co-workers is the leading cause of inadequately financed retirements today. If a co-worker told me, it must be true!
__________________
"I wasn't born blue blood. I was born blue-collar." John Wort Hannam
youbet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 04:10 PM   #6
Moderator
rodi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 9,261
Thanks.
Part of my confusion about this came from an article that stated
Quote:
(Tax rules require that once IRA withdrawals begin, they must continue.)
Coping with the financial toll of terminal illness - Dec. 13, 2012
That quote fails to mention that this is ONLY true if it's an inherited IRA/401k... different rules for inherited retirement accounts.
(The article is the follow up article to the one being discussed about end of life decisions/costs.)

I need to stop confusing myself. I was pretty sure I was right by so was my coworker (convinced he was right).
rodi is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 04:11 PM   #7
Moderator
rodi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 9,261
Quote:
Originally Posted by youbet View Post
A co-worker told me that listening to financial advise given by co-workers is the leading cause of inadequately financed retirements today. If a co-worker told me, it must be true!
Too true.
Same with financial advice from relatives. Or worse - financial advise from relatives based on something *their* coworker told them.

LOL
rodi is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 05:01 PM   #8
Moderator
braumeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Northern Kentucky
Posts: 9,632
Moral: Never get your financial advice from a cow orker.

It's bad enough the poor cows have to put up with it; there's no reason you should.
__________________
I thought growing old would take longer.
braumeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 05:36 PM   #9
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Rustward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,606
I wonder if your coworker is confusing the rules for a 72-T distribution (which apply if you want penalty-free access to IRA funds before 59.5) with distribution rules that apply after 59.5.

What you were told is not so.
Rustward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 06:34 PM   #10
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
NW-Bound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,715
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rustward View Post
I wonder if your coworker is confusing the rules for a 72-T distribution (which apply if you want penalty-free access to IRA funds before 59.5) with distribution rules that apply after 59.5.
+1
__________________
"Old age is the most unexpected of all things that can happen to a man" -- Leon Trotsky
NW-Bound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 07:57 PM   #11
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Vermont & Sarasota, FL
Posts: 17,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by rodi View Post
Too true.
Same with financial advice from relatives. Or worse - financial advise from relatives based on something *their* coworker told them.

LOL
I hear you. 2 of my BILs sell life insurance and annuities.
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 08:50 PM   #12
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 576
The RMD starting at 70.5 years old will be slightly less than 4% of the total asset within that IRA, so if you use the 4% rule, the RMD is automatically accounted for.
bondi688 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2012, 10:07 AM   #13
Moderator
Sarah in SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 13,479
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rustward View Post
I wonder if your coworker is confusing the rules for a 72-T distribution (which apply if you want penalty-free access to IRA funds before 59.5) with distribution rules that apply after 59.5.

What you were told is not so.
This is exactly what the guy was talking about, I bet. Those do have to continue. The 72T is the Substantially Equal Periodic Payments dealie.
__________________
“One day your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it's worth watching.”
Gerard Arthur Way

Sarah in SC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2012, 03:55 PM   #14
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Upstate Ruralia
Posts: 303
Rodi how old are you?
Lcountz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2012, 04:35 PM   #15
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Rustward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarah in SC View Post
This is exactly what the guy was talking about, I bet. Those do have to continue. The 72T is the Substantially Equal Periodic Payments dealie.
If I understand correctly, the 72-T distribution can be stopped after age 59.5 AND the distribution has been taken for a minimum of five years.
Rustward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2012, 06:15 PM   #16
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by bondi688 View Post
The RMD starting at 70.5 years old will be slightly less than 4% of the total asset within that IRA, so if you use the 4% rule, the RMD is automatically accounted for.
but only for a few yrs?
__________________

kaneohe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


 

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:24 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.