Early Retirement Forums

Go Back   Early Retirement Forums > General > FIRE and Money





Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 12-19-2007, 07:37 PM   #1
FIRE'd@51
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
FIRE'd@51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,056
Congress passes AMT patch

Today, Congress passed an AMT patch for tax year 2007. The patch is an increase in the exemption amount to $66,250 ($44,350) for joint (single) filers. In 2006 the exemption amount was $62,550 ($42,250) for joint (single) filers. Without the patch the exemption amount would have reverted to $45,000 ($33,750) for joint (single) filers.
FIRE'd@51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2007, 08:28 PM   #2
Want2retire
Moderator
 
Want2retire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 6,084
Quote:
Originally Posted by FIRE'd@51 View Post
Today, Congress passed an AMT patch for tax year 2007. The patch is an increase in the exemption amount to $66,250 ($44,350) for joint (single) filers. In 2006 the exemption amount was $62,550 ($42,250) for joint (single) filers. Without the patch the exemption amount would have reverted to $45,000 ($33,750) for joint (single) filers.
I guess that's better than nothing. If AMT is just supposed to be for the "fat cat" contingent, it would have made more sense to patch it with $200K($150K) for joint(single) filers. But I guess we should be glad to get anything out of them.
__________________
Dreaming of retirement....
" - - my greatest skill has been to want but little - - " (Henry David Thoreau, in Walden)
Want2retire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 08:43 AM   #3
ERD50
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 3,684
Are there any numbers available on how much this will reduce the income tax revenue for tax year 2007?

-ERD50
ERD50 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 08:51 AM   #4
DangerMouse
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
DangerMouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 628
I'm ecstatic that this has finally been passed because I hope to save $4-5k by not having to pay the AMT.

HR Block have a good calculator which tells you what your taxes are. However it has not yet been updated to take into account this change.
__________________

I be a girl, he's a boy. Semi-FIRED July 08. Mid 40s, no kidlets.
DangerMouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 08:52 AM   #5
REWahoo
Administrator
 
REWahoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 11,617
Quote:
Originally Posted by DangerMouse View Post
HR Block have a good calculator which tells you what your taxes are. However it has not yet been updated to take into account this change.
Can you provide us a link?

Thanks...
__________________
[Closed for renovation]



REWahoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 08:52 AM   #6
audreyh1
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,203
Looks like they just fixed the "patch" to be the same as last year?

Audrey
audreyh1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 08:56 AM   #7
BigBob
Recycles dryer sheets
 
BigBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 130
I wonder how many of our tax dollars went into that patch, which, from the looks of it, they will need to visit again each year. At least they got it in before the April 15 deadline so we can do our taxes.
BigBob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 09:23 AM   #8
REWahoo
Administrator
 
REWahoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 11,617
Last year H&R Block released a free version of 2006 TaxCut software in late November.

H&R Block TaxCut Basic - Reviews and free H&R Block TaxCut Basic downloads at Download.com

I've been unable to find a 2007 release and wonder if Block isn't giving out a free version this year or if the delay by our esteemed representatives in Washington has held things up.
__________________
[Closed for renovation]



REWahoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 10:28 AM   #9
OAG
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
OAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dublin, Ohio
Posts: 1,824
Go to TAX ACT and get their 2007 free advance version (final copy will also be free).
__________________
Proud Vietnam Veteran: Cu Chi 66, 1/25th, HHC 25th and Pleiku 66-67 41st Sig Bn 1st STRATCOM
OAG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 10:38 AM   #10
Caoineag
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 102
Yeeeck, I think I need to look up info on the AMT, I had no idea we had been skirting just under...
Caoineag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 10:50 AM   #11
REWahoo
Administrator
 
REWahoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 11,617
Quote:
Originally Posted by R Wood View Post
Go to TAX ACT and get their 2007 free advance version (final copy will also be free).
Thanks, I've already downloaded TaxAct. I was hoping for TaxCut since I've been using it for years and want to use the auto transfer of information feature so I won't have to reenter a bunch of basic stuff.

Heaven forbid, I might have to shell out $20 and actually buy a copy...
__________________
[Closed for renovation]



REWahoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 10:56 AM   #12
FIRE'd@51
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
FIRE'd@51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,056
Quote:
Originally Posted by ERD50 View Post
Are there any numbers available on how much this will reduce the income tax revenue for tax year 2007?
approximately $50 billion
FIRE'd@51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 03:59 PM   #13
ERD50
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 3,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by FIRE'd@51 View Post
approximately $50 billion
Thanks, I also see that they didn't raise taxes anywhere else, so this is not revenue neutral.

-ERD50
ERD50 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 04:33 PM   #14
bamsphd
Recycles dryer sheets
 
bamsphd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by ERD50 View Post
Thanks, I also see that they didn't raise taxes anywhere else, so this is not revenue neutral.
Reportedly, they could find 60 senators who wanted to "patch" the AMT, but they could not get 60 senators to agree on where to raise taxes or cut spending to keep it revenue neutral.
bamsphd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 05:10 PM   #15
igsoy
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 234
Quote:
The Washington Post the Senate twice rejected a House-passed AMT patch that would have been paid for by closing down offshore tax havens or by increasing the tax rate on managers of hedge funds and private-equity firms.
The republicans in the Senate blocked the revenue neutral part of this after the House passed it. They are beholden to the .01 percenters who don't have many votes between them, but considering their campaign contributions, I guess their votes are worth much much more than yours and mine.
igsoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 05:22 PM   #16
FIRE'd@51
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
FIRE'd@51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,056
Quote:
Originally Posted by igsoy View Post
The republicans in the Senate blocked the revenue neutral part of this after the House passed it.
IIRC, the Senate version passed 88-5, so many Dems went along with it. Interestingly, both Hillary Clinton and Charles Shumer opposed the taxation of "carried interest" as ordinary income rather than capital gains. Do you suppose maybe that had something to do with campaign contributions?
FIRE'd@51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 06:56 PM   #17
Goonie
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Goonie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: North Central Illinois
Posts: 2,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by REWahoo View Post
Thanks, I've already downloaded TaxAct. I was hoping for TaxCut since I've been using it for years and want to use the auto transfer of information feature so I won't have to reenter a bunch of basic stuff.

Heaven forbid, I might have to shell out $20 and actually buy a copy...
My Mom received "TaxCut Premium" in the mail last week. It says it's the exact same software that you have to pay for to purchase online. One of the FAQ's was "Why did we receive this in the mail?" There answer was basically 'Because we wanted to make things easy for you."

Mom doesn't do her own taxes, so that isn't how she got on their mailing list for the free CD. I used TC last year, but I didn't get the free CD.....from them....but I have it now!

You might ask friends or neighbors if they got it in the mail, and see if they want to get rid of it.
__________________
"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss -
Retired April 2007 @ 50 with COLA'd DB Pension plus Lifetime Medical & Dental Insurance.
Goonie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 07:15 PM   #18
igsoy
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 234
Quote:
Originally Posted by FIRE'd@51 View Post
IIRC, the Senate version passed 88-5, so many Dems went along with it. Interestingly, both Hillary Clinton and Charles Shumer opposed the taxation of "carried interest" as ordinary income rather than capital gains. Do you suppose maybe that had something to do with campaign contributions?

Of course it did, that is an example of why many Democratic Party voters don't support her in the primaries. There are candidates in the field who will represent them better.
igsoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 09:57 PM   #19
DangerMouse
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
DangerMouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 628
Quote:
Originally Posted by igsoy View Post
The republicans in the Senate blocked the revenue neutral part of this after the House passed it. They are beholden to the .01 percenters who don't have many votes between them, but considering their campaign contributions, I guess their votes are worth much much more than yours and mine.
You seem to forget that many of us ordinary tax payers are caught in AMT hell. We are certainly not incredibly wealthy, we do ok by many standards. However, AMT triggered for us even though we have no deductions besides donations to charity and state tax. We have no dependents and I think our contributions for Federal tax before adding in the AMT was more than sufficient. We live in a State (Ca.) which requires high incomes just to get by.
__________________

I be a girl, he's a boy. Semi-FIRED July 08. Mid 40s, no kidlets.
DangerMouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 10:25 PM   #20
youbet
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
youbet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,387
Quote:
Originally Posted by bamsphd View Post
Reportedly, they could find 60 senators who wanted to "patch" the AMT, but they could not get 60 senators to agree on where to raise taxes or cut spending to keep it revenue neutral.
Hmmmm...... Aren't there almost 60 Dem senators now? Wouldn't this have just taken onesy - twosy GOP senators joining in? Seems strange.

Edit: Oooops....what was I thinking? Actually its:

110th Congress (2007-2009)
Majority Party: Democrat (49 seats)
Minority Party: Republican (49 seats)
Other Parties: 1Independent; 1 Independent Democrat
Total Seats: 100

So I guess the Dems would have had to go get the two independents and 9 GOP senators to pass the provision making it revenue neutral.

Anyone know where I can go look at the actual votes by senator? This should have been made revenue neutral and any Dems that didn't back the revenue neutral provision should, of course, be skinned alive.
__________________
Over all was the silence of the wilderness - Sigurd Olsen

Last edited by youbet; 12-20-2007 at 10:54 PM.
youbet is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply