Early Retirement Forums

Go Back   Early Retirement Forums > General > FIRE and Money





Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 12-19-2007, 07:35 PM   #21
lsbcal
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
lsbcal's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 520
I'm not sure if it was mentioned, but I'd definitely convert if in a 15% or under tax bracket. Above that I'm not so sure.
lsbcal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2007, 07:38 PM   #22
TromboneAl
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
TromboneAl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,166
There are online calculators in which you put in your info, and it tells you what you'd end up with for Conversion vs. Not.

Also, consider whether there will be some point at which you are in a low tax bracket. For example, you are living off taxable savings, as I'm doing now. If so, you can do your converting then.
__________________
- Al -- Always serious, never joking. No, wait. Never serious... Always... I forget.
TromboneAl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 04:00 AM   #23
mathjak107
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,430
you have to figure anytime our gov't gives us something you know the odds arent in your favor. they would love nothing more than to give us all the opportunity to convert to roths or put our money in roth 401ks or roth ira,s. they know statistically most of america will be in lower tax brackets when they retire. even if you stay the same they are loosing 3% a year in your tax money as your bracket increases. allowing more income in the 0-10% bracket. remember marginaly your brkt may hit 25% but most of your income may be at a nominal rate of 15% . ill hold on to all my 401k money and ira money and let the full amount compound vs saying goodbye to a 1/3 converting thank you paying taxes on money i may never owe taxes on.

for someone who may be at the beginning of their working life and in the 10%-15 % bracket roths make sense if they see their income as at the low of their career . at a deductable 10% or 15% it may not pay to take the write off now and the roth makes better sense

like i said my plan will be to spend my iras first dwindling them down thru the early years so the mandatory distributions are lower. even a 72t election would probley work out way better than a roth for most of america .

Last edited by mathjak107; 12-20-2007 at 04:08 AM.
mathjak107 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 10:02 AM   #24
lsbcal
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
lsbcal's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 520
During our working life my wife and I both funded our retirement plan options to the max. When I ER'd the 401k and company deferred retirement money was rolled over to an IRA. Now we have much more money in IRA's and Roth's then taxable savings. This gives us a nice low tax profile. We can make changes to our investment accounts without worrying about taxable gains until withdrawal.

I've converted the max amount to Roth's each year. Probably won't start taking SS for another 6 years. This coming year I won't convert to Roth's since in 2008-2010 the cap gain rate is zero up to the top of the 15% bracket (see this http://www.early-retirement.org/foru...-me-31953.html ).

I think this will work out over the next 10 years which is what counts for me. Who knows what may happen in the next 20 to 30 years though as far as tax law is concerned.
lsbcal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 08:09 PM   #25
retiringby50
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 122
I wrote a reply but now am changing it completely. As BigBob mentioned, the household income has to be $100,000 or less, so I'm not qualified, at least not this year. Will wait till I'm unemployed again or till one of those exempt years. Thanks!

Last edited by retiringby50; 12-20-2007 at 08:17 PM.
retiringby50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2007, 06:15 PM   #26
aenlighten
Recycles dryer sheets
 
aenlighten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 270
Roth does allow a larger deferral

but a simple reduction in tax rate from a 25% marginal to a 20% gross from accumulation to decumulation would be enough to wipe out that advantage. It really seems the determinant is whether you are planning on a constant level income or wealthier retirement (which bracket you will be in). Most of us probably plan for the latter and would benefit from a conversion, but others may not.
aenlighten is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
(FAQ archive) Should I convert my IRA/401(k) to a Roth or not? Nords Early Retirement FAQs 0 10-16-2007 04:46 PM
My First Convert 2B FIRE and Money 16 04-15-2007 01:47 PM
IRA not deductible - convert to Roth someday? spncity FIRE and Money 6 02-20-2007 12:43 PM
Yet another reason to convert to a Roth IRA Nords FIRE and Money 5 02-13-2007 07:59 AM
Best way to convert $ to Euros/Pounds? renferme FIRE and Money 31 02-09-2007 07:53 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:31 PM.

Other Social Knowledge forum communities:
Cooking Forum - Sailing Forum - Early Retirement - Airstream Trailer - Aquarium Forum - Royal Forum - Book Forum - Volkswagen Touareg Forum - Jeep Wrangler Forum - Whitewater Kayaking & Rafting Forum - Fiberglass RV Forum - RV Forum - Truck Conversion - U2 Music Forum
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0