Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Convertibles
Old 12-17-2005, 06:13 PM   #1
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 140
Convertibles

We have about 12% of our portfolio in Calamos Growth & Income Fund (CVTRX). The Morningstar category is Convertibles. The expense ratio is 1.08%. Is this a good type of fund to be invested in? We have a Financial Advisor who put us into this and I am trying to understand better what we are invested in. Thanks!
__________________

__________________
smooch is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Re: Convertibles
Old 12-17-2005, 07:55 PM   #2
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
JPatrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,494
Re: Convertibles

Your fund is a pretty good performer, but you are paying a load and fairly high fees.* 12% is not unreasonable , but I wouldn't go higher. Converts have done well in the past and should be OK going forward.
If you hadn't already bought it I'd say check out FCVSX and probably others that are equal performers and have lower fees.
__________________

__________________
JPatrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: Convertibles
Old 12-19-2005, 07:07 AM   #3
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
brewer12345's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 16,391
Re: Convertibles

I think JPatrick answered yor post without actually answering your question .

What the fund owns is equities (about a third) and convertibles bonds and preferred stocks. You presumably know what equities are. Convertible bonds and preferreds (very little difference between them) are fixed income instruments (i.e. bonds) that pay a coupon and either 1) allow the owner to convert the bond into the equity of the issuer or 2) convert into equity at a specified time (mandatory, not an option). The first type (optional converts) allow you to have you cake and eat it too: if the stock goes flat or down, you don't covert and keep it as a bond; if the stock goes up, you can convert or sell the bond which will have increased in price because it tracks the stock. The cost is usually a much lower than market yield on the bond (converts might have yields of 2 or 3%). The second type of convertible (madatory converts) pay a richer coupon and are essentially a higher-yielding form of the underlying equity. The cost is that you usually won't sharre in the appreciation of the stock until it goes above a certain amount. For example, I am looking at a mandatory convert that yields about 7% and converts in 3 years. I won't sharre in teh stock proce appreciation unless the stock is over $30 a share (currently at 27 or so).
__________________
"There are three kinds of men. The one that learns by reading. The few who learn by observation. The rest have to pee on the electric fence for themselves."



- Will Rogers
brewer12345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: Convertibles
Old 12-19-2005, 07:20 PM   #4
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 140
Re: Convertibles

Thank you both for your answers. If I am reading your answer correctly, Brewer, we are giving up some yield for the option to convert? I'm still not sure if this is a good type of fund to be in.
__________________
smooch is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: Convertibles
Old 12-19-2005, 09:18 PM   #5
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
JPatrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,494
Re: Convertibles

Whether this is a suitable fund depends on about 101 varables unique to your situation.* Such as, what is the make up of the rest of your portfolio, is your key objective growth or income, and how soon do you anticipate needing this money.
To me, any portfolio that is being constructed for a 5 year plus time window can do very well with this type fund among the 10 percenters.* In the 10 % category I also include REITS, Emerging Markets, Small Country debt.* Other more traditional fund types deserve more than 10 % IMO.
As I noted earlier, your fund has had a nice 5 year run, so if it fits, keep it and hope the run continues.
__________________
JPatrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: Convertibles
Old 12-19-2005, 09:58 PM   #6
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 420
Re: Convertibles

Seen from an asset correlation point of view I believe that convertible volatility/return lies somewhere between equities and bonds. Just something to consider when you decide on your overall equity/fixed income split. Cheers!
__________________
preben is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: Convertibles
Old 12-20-2005, 06:59 AM   #7
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
brewer12345's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 16,391
Re: Convertibles

Quote:
Originally Posted by smooch
Thank you both for your answers. If I am reading your answer correctly, Brewer, we are giving up some yield for the option to convert? I'm still not sure if this is a good type of fund to be in.
If we are talking about a convertible bond, generally yes. For example, CCRT just issued a convertible bond due in 2035 with a yield of 5.875% that is convertible into shares of their stock at the option of the bondholder. The bond is not rated, but if it were it would probably be well into junk territory. I would imagine that straight debt from that company would probably have to yield 9 or 10% to get the deal done.

If we are talking about a mandatorily convertible preferred, you probably want to view the security as basically a higher-yielding form of the issuer's equity. I am looking at a preferred that yields about 7% (versus 2% or so for the underlying stock). This security mandatorily converts into the underlying equity in three years.
__________________

__________________
"There are three kinds of men. The one that learns by reading. The few who learn by observation. The rest have to pee on the electric fence for themselves."



- Will Rogers
brewer12345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


 

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:03 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.