Join Early Retirement Today
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
DB(k) Plan
Old 08-24-2009, 03:46 PM   #1
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
mickeyd's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: South Texas~29N/98W
Posts: 5,660
DB(k) Plan

Interesting new blending of two retirement plans.

The DB(k) melds a 401(k) savings plan with a small guaranteed income stream. “You take the best of the defined benefit concept and put it together with a 401(k) plan,” says Lynn Dudley, senior vice president for policy with the American Benefits Council. The key elements of the plan:
  • A defined benefit equal to 1% of final average pay for each year of the employee’s service, up to 20 years. An automatic enrollment feature for the 401(k) portion. Unless an employee specifically opts out or changes the contribution level, 4% of pay is automatically shunted into 401(k) savings.
  • An employer match of at least 50% of employee 401(k) contributions, with a maximum required match of 2% of pay.
the-dbk-pension-of-the-future.html: Personal Finance News from Yahoo! Finance

Part-Owner of Texas

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. Groucho Marx

In dire need of: faster horses, younger woman, older whiskey, more money.
mickeyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 08-24-2009, 04:31 PM   #2
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,504
Sounds interesting but somebody has to fund the DB part.....I thought the reason DBs are disappearing was that employers didn't want to fund them. Is there a carrot in here for them?
edit: or perhaps they're just annuitizing part of the K they're making contributions the default bc the masses would not do it by themselves?

kaneohe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2009, 07:08 PM   #3
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
freebird5825's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Nowhere, 43N Latitude, NY
Posts: 9,019
It looks, at very top level, just a little like the federal FERS plan.
"All our dreams can come true, if we have the courage to pursue them." - Walt Disney
freebird5825 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2009, 08:38 PM   #4
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 160
Where does the funding for the DB part come from? If it's part of the employer contribution, then likely this would make employers less likely to offer matches. If it's part of the employee contributions, then how much of what I put in will be redirected into the annuity that I am effectively purchasing? While I have no objection to getting MORE from my 401(k) "oh look, everything I had before PLUS a 1% per year defined benefit pension" I expect there are will be costs to provide this. Who pays and how much?

Does this mean these plans are provided by insurance companies who can offer the DB annuity part. They must love that.
quietman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2009, 09:04 PM   #5
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 961
IMO, the main reason that many companies have jettisoned the DB plan is that the companies were underpricing the cost of the DB plan. For example, a fairly risk free way to fund the DB plan was to invest the plan assets and contributions in bonds [nominal bonds b/c of the nominal annuities the DB plan paid out]. Well, the companies realized that by increasing the % of the DB plan's assets to assets that offered a higher rate of return [i.e. equities, hedge funds, etc.], the company was then allowed to increase the discount rate for the DB plan's liabilities [b/c of the higher rate of return], which in turn vastly lowered the DB plan's "expected" contributions. And if the return never showed up, the DB plan could just shove the DB plan over to the PBGC.

My guess is that the DB(k) is probably another option inside the 401(k), kind of like TIAA is with TIAA-CREF's 403(b) plans. You'd basically be buying a deferred fixed annuity from an insurance company.. which is kind of a step up for most 401(k)'s. However, another guess is that the insurance companies will actually be charging rational prices for these things, and using bonds to immunize the liabilities [like the DB plans should have been using]. So, people are going to be unpleasantly surprised about the actual cost of these deferred fixed annuities.

- Alec
ats5g is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 05:14 AM   #6
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
donheff's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,103
Originally Posted by freebird5825 View Post
It looks, at very top level, just a little like the federal FERS plan.
Yes, include a somewhat limited COLA and it is FERS. Employers could consult the Fed actuaries who determine the government contribution needed to fully cover the costs.
Every man is, or hopes to be, an Idler. -- Samuel Johnson
donheff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 06:26 AM   #7
ziggy29's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,419
Yep -- it sounded a bit like FERS to me. In truth there's nothing inherently unsustainable about DB pensions IF we're realistic about lifespan increases and for expected return on investments for *appropriate* investment mixes in the pension fund -- and if the amount the employer puts in is reasonably figured as a portion of the compensation. Being able to fall back on the PBGC and/or go back to the taxpayer for "help" with unrealistic assumptions created the morass.

"Hey, for every ten dollars, that's another hour that I have to be in the work place. That's an hour of my life. And my life is a very finite thing. I have only 'x' number of hours left before I'm dead. So how do I want to use these hours of my life? Do I want to use them just spending it on more crap and more stuff, or do I want to start getting a handle on it and using my life more intelligently?" -- Joe Dominguez (1938 - 1997)
ziggy29 is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Safe car part of health plan and/or retirement plan Buckeye Health and Early Retirement 21 07-10-2016 02:58 PM
50 year plan, best way to plan kat FIRECalc support 22 01-01-2009 05:38 AM
Does your employer sponsored 401k plan utilize a third party plan advisor? Disappointed FIRE and Money 13 03-25-2008 03:12 AM
Stock Market Decline-Tests your beliefs - Have a plan and work the plan dex FIRE and Money 21 08-18-2007 01:24 PM
35 buckets plan, starting WR of 7.4% - punch holes in me plan citril FIRE and Money 35 03-10-2007 05:46 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:06 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.